Second nearest neighbor

In their model they retained only the first- and second-nearest neighbor interactions, so that the Hamiltonian assumed the following form... 

The parent structure of the anion-deficient fluorite structure phases is the cubic fluorite structure (Fig. 4.7). As in the case of the anion-excess fluorite-related phases, diffraction patterns from typical samples reveals that the defect structure is complex, and the true defect structure is still far from resolved for even the most studied materials. For example, in one of the best known of these, yttria-stabilized zirconia, early studies were interpreted as suggesting that the anions around vacancies were displaced along < 111 > to form local clusters, rather as in the Willis 2 2 2 cluster described in the previous section, Recently, the structure has been described in terms of anion modulation (Section 4.10). In addition, simulations indicate that oxygen vacancies prefer to be located as second nearest neighbors to Y3+ dopant ions, to form triangular clusters (Fig. 4.11). Note that these suggestions are not... 

Of the matrix elements (im V/ /W), only the two-center integrals between first or second nearest neighbors are retained. The coefficients aim then... 

The model treated in this section is essentially the same as in the previous section, except that the sites are all different and are arranged linearly (Fig. 5.6). In this particular model we distinguish between nearest-neighbor (nn) sites, such as a and b, or b and c, and second-nearest-neighbor (sn) sites, here the sites a and c. 

For all the above reasons we have defined g(C) without reference to any hypothetical, independent-site system. One simply extracts both 1(C) and all from the experimental data, and then constructs the quantity g(C). When the sites are identical in a weak sense, i.e., all k = k, some of the correlations for a given / might differ. For example, four identical subunits arranged in a square will have only one intrinsic binding constant k, but two different pair correlation functions. For this particular example we have four nearest-neighbor pair correlations g (2), and two second-nearest-neighbor pair correlations gJJ)- The average correlation for this case is... 

Note that the sign of the nearest-neighbor pair correlation depends on whether T > 1 or Tj < 1. This is similar to in Eq. (6.3.4). On the other hand, the second-nearest-neighbor pair correlation is always positive, as ing see Eq. (6.3.5). The reason for this difference is again due to having one intervening boundary in the former case, but two boundaries in the latter. As before, either T = 1 or is a... 

Using arguments similar to the above, we can easily see that the second nearest-neighbor correlation may assume the form... 

While assigning a class is the goal of KNN, it is also of interest to determine the confidence to place on the classification. Several approaches can be taken to measure this confidence. For example, more confidence is placed on classifications when all K nearest neighbors are from the same class. Conversely, the confidence in tlie classification decreases as the K nearest neighbors are represented by more tlian one class (e.g., the first nearest neighbor is from class A and the second nearest neighbor is from B). 

Sample No. True Class Class of First Nearest Neighbor Class of Second Nearest Neighbor Class of Third Nearest Neighbor... 

Unknown First Nearest Neighbor Second Nearest Neighbor Third Nearest Neighbor Goodness Value ... 

Another method for calculating electronic structures of complex surfaces is the cluster calculation. As the electronic state of an atom is mostly affected by the nearest and second-nearest neighbors (Heine, 1980), the results of cluster calculations provide a reasonably accurate account of the electronic states of the top atoms on a surface. Fig. 4.17 is the result of a calculation of W clusters by Ohnishi and Tsukada (1989). 

A very striking and beautiful feature of polytypism is the behavior of impurity atoms. In Figure 1.6, it may be seen that the sites are not equivalent in the hexagonal polytypes 6H-SiC and 4H-SiC. The difference is in the second-nearest neighbors. 

An experimental measurement of the one-dimensional displacement distributions has been reported for self-diffusion of W on the W (112) plane by Ehrlich Fudda,86 and Re on W (112).134 Their result agrees with eq. (5.57) to within statistical uncertainties. However, a later result by Ehrlich135 agrees better with a model having 10% of the atomic jumps extended to the second nearest neighbor distance. 

Fig. 3. Error bounds for the heat capacity of the harmonic vibrations of a body-centered cubic lattice with first- and second-nearest neighbor force constants.

For the diffusion of vacancies on a face-centered cubic (f.c.c.) lattice with lattice constant a, let the probability of first- and second-nearest-neighbor jumps be p and 1 — p, respectively. At what value of p will the contributions to diffusion of first- and second-nearest-neighbor jumps be the same Solution. There is no correlation and, using Eq. 7.29,... 

The number of first nearest-neighbor jumps is NTp and the number of second nearest-neighbor jumps is ATt(1 — p). Therefore,... 

We now show that these differences are due to the distinction between the first and the second nearest neighbor force constants of the four elements. Let ft i and ft2 be the first and second nearest neighbor force constants. And ft i(hkl) and ft2(hkl) be their respective force constants in the direction, and ft(hkl), the interplanar force constants for (hkl) planes. Then, the following force constant relationships can be derived for a bee structure as illustrated in Figs. 2, 3. 

The ES-mechanism of Frenkel-pair formation as a result of excitation of Rydberg atomic states was confirmed by recent molecular dynamics calculations [28,29]. After the bubble formation the surrounding ground state atoms appear to have moved to the second shell. It was found that the second-nearest neighboring vacancy-interstitial pairs could create the permanent defects, which remain in the lattice after exciton annihilation (Fig.Sb) [29],... 

These maxima in the Fourier transform data, which correspond to the different chromium coordination shells, were isolated using a filter window function. The inverse transform of each peak was generated and fitted using a non-linear least squares program. The amplitude and phase functions were obtained from the theoretical curves reported by Teo and Lee (2 ). The parameters which were refined included a scale factor, the Debye-Waller factor, the interatomic distance, and the threshold energy difference. This process led to refined distances of 1.97(2) and 2.73(2) A which were attributed to Cr-0 and Cr-Cr distances, respectively. Our inability to resolve second nearest neighbor Cr-Cr distances may be a consequence of the limited domain size of the pillars. 

Atoms in the bulk simple cubic crystal have the six nearest neighbors and 12 second-nearest neighbors shown in the upper right figure for a total binding energy of 6cj>i + 122- Each bond is shared between two atoms. Hence, the mean sublimation energy of the crystal is one-half that value, or... 

Per unit volume of the crystal, the mean sublimation energy of a simple cubic structure with lattice parameter a is Eq. 2.22 divided by a3. Compare this with adatoms adsorbed on a smooth face, which have one nearest neighbor and four second-nearest neighbors. Their binding energy is thus significantly lower ((J>1 +4(1)2). 

---