Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Atomic models quantum model

The goal of this chapter is to show how the organization of the table, condensed from countless hours of laboratory work, was explained perfectly by the new quantum-mechanical atomic model. This model answers one of the central questions in chemistry why do the elements behave as they do Or, rephrasing the question to fit the main topic of this chapter how does the electron configuration of an element—the distribution of electrons within the orbitals of its atoms—relate to its chemical and physical properties ... [Pg.236]

Where is the force acting on the i-th atom or particle at time t and is obtained as the negative gradient of the interaction potential U, m. is the atomic mass and the atomic position. The interaction potentials together with their parameters, describe how the particles in a system interact with each other (so-called force field). Force field may be obtained by quantum method (e g., Ab initio), empirical method (e g., Lennard-Jones, Mores, and Bom-Mayer) or quantum-empirical method (e.g., embedded atom model, glue model, bond order potential). [Pg.217]

In molecular dynamics applications there is a growing interest in mixed quantum-classical models various kinds of which have been proposed in the current literature. We will concentrate on two of these models the adiabatic or time-dependent Born-Oppenheimer (BO) model, [8, 13], and the so-called QCMD model. Both models describe most atoms of the molecular system by the means of classical mechanics but an important, small portion of the system by the means of a wavefunction. In the BO model this wavefunction is adiabatically coupled to the classical motion while the QCMD model consists of a singularly perturbed Schrddinger equation nonlinearly coupled to classical Newtonian equations, 2.2. [Pg.380]

The algorithms of the mixed classical-quantum model used in HyperChem are different for semi-empirical and ab mi/io methods. The semi-empirical methods in HyperChem treat boundary atoms (atoms that are used to terminate a subset quantum mechanical region inside a single molecule) as specially parameterized pseudofluorine atoms. However, HyperChem will not carry on mixed model calculations, using ab initio quantum mechanical methods, if there are any boundary atoms in the molecular system. Thus, if you would like to compute a wavefunction for only a portion of a molecular system using ab initio methods, you must select single or multiple isolated molecules as your selected quantum mechanical region, without any boundary atoms. [Pg.108]

Electron-tunneling Model. Several models based on quantum mechanics have been introduced. One describes how an electron of the conducting band tunnels to the leaving atom, or vice versa. The probability of tunneling depends on the ionization potential of the sputtered element, the velocity of the atom (time available for the tunneling process) and on the work function of the metal (adiabatic surface ionization, Schroeer model [3.46]). [Pg.107]

Valence band spectra provide information about the electronic and chemical structure of the system, since many of the valence electrons participate directly in chemical bonding. One way to evaluate experimental UPS spectra is by using a fingerprint method, i.e., a comparison with known standards. Another important approach is to utilize comparison with the results of appropriate model quantum-chemical calculations 4. The combination with quantum-chcmica) calculations allow for an assignment of the different features in the electronic structure in terms of atomic or molecular orbitals or in terms of band structure. The experimental valence band spectra in some of the examples included in this chapter arc inteqneted with the help of quantum-chemical calculations. A brief outline and some basic considerations on theoretical approaches are outlined in the next section. [Pg.388]

In recent years the old quantum theory, associated principally with the names of Bohr and Sommerfeld, encountered a large number of difficulties, all of which vanished before the new quantum mechanics of Heisenberg. Because of its abstruse and difficultly interpretable mathematical foundation, Heisenberg s quantum mechanics cannot be easily applied to the relatively complicated problems of the structures and properties of many-electron atoms and of molecules in particular is this true for chemical problems, which usually do not permit simple dynamical formulation in terms of nuclei and electrons, but instead require to be treated with the aid of atomic and molecular models. Accordingly, it is especially gratifying that Schrodinger s interpretation of his wave mechanics3 provides a simple and satisfactory atomic model, more closely related to the chemist s atom than to that of the old quantum theory. [Pg.256]

Photo 5 (left) Linus Pauling with Arnold Sommerfeld (on left). Sommerfeld, well-known professor of theoretical physics in the University of Munich, Germany, was an expert on an early form of quantum mechanics, the Bohr-Sommerfeld atomic model. The picture was taken on the occasion of Sommerfeld s visit to Caltech in 1928. Pauling studied quantum mechanics with Sommerfeld in 1926—1927, which is where Pauling got his start in the application of quantum mechanics to chemical bonding (Chapter 1) and to the calculation of molecular properties (Chapter 8). [Pg.448]

Whether the Bohr atomic model or the quantum mechanical model is introduced to students, it is inevitable that they have to learn, among other things, that (i) the atomic nucleus is surrounded by electrons and (ii) most of an atom is empty space. Students understanding of the visual representation of the above two statements was explored by Harrison and Treagust (1996). In the study, 48 Grade 8-10... [Pg.61]

Bohr s hypothesis solved the impossible atom problem. The energy of an electron in orbit was fixed. It could go from one energy level to another, but it could not emit a continuous stream of radiation and spiral into the nucleus. The quantum model forbids that. [Pg.21]

In practice, the harmonic oscillator has limits. In the ideal case, the two atoms can approach and recede with no change in the attractive force and without any repulsive force between electron clouds. In reality, the two atoms will dissociate when far enough apart, and will be repulsed by van der Waal s forces as they come closer. The net effect is the varying attraction between the two in the bond. When using a quantum model, the energy levels would be evenly spaced, making the overtones forbidden. [Pg.167]

Electron diffraction provides experimental diffraction spectra for comparison with computed spectra obtained from various intuitive geometrical models, but this technique alone is generally insufficient to locate the hydrogen atoms. A quantum approach, on the other hand, indicates the positions of the H atoms, which can then be introduced into the calculation of the theoretical spectra in order to complete the determination of the geometry. [Pg.13]

In the early development of the atomic model scientists initially thought that, they could define the sub-atomic particles by the laws of classical physics—that is, they were tiny bits of matter. However, they later discovered that this particle view of the atom could not explain many of the observations that scientists were making. About this time, a model (the quantum mechanical model) that attributed the properties of both matter and waves to particles began to gain favor. This model described the behavior of electrons in terms of waves (electromagnetic radiation). [Pg.108]

In this quantum mechanical model of the hydrogen atom, three quantum numbers are used to describe an atomic orbital ... [Pg.7]

Distinguish clearly between an electron orbit, as depicted in Bohr s atomic model, and an electron orbital, as depicted in the quantum mechanical model of the atom. [Pg.133]

In this section, you saw how the ideas of quantum mechanics led to a new, revolutionary atomic model—the quantum mechanical model of the atom. According to this model, electrons have both matter-like and wave-like properties. Their position and momentum cannot both be determined with certainty, so they must be described in terms of probabilities. An orbital represents a mathematical description of the volume of space in which an electron has a high probability of being found. You learned the first three quantum numbers that describe the size, energy, shape, and orientation of an orbital. In the next section, you will use quantum numbers to describe the total number of electrons in an atom and the energy levels in which they are most likely to be found in their ground state. You will also discover how the ideas of quantum mechanics explain the structure and organization of the periodic table. [Pg.138]


See other pages where Atomic models quantum model is mentioned: [Pg.93]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.640]    [Pg.686]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.132]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.26 ]




SEARCH



Atom , atomic mass quantum mechanical model

Atomic Model of Semiconductor Quantum Dots

Atomic model quantum mechanical

Atomic modeling

Atomic modelling

Atomic models

Atomic models quantum-mechanic

Atomic structure quantum model

Atomic structure quantum-mechanical model

Atoms models

Atoms quantum mechanical model

Atoms quantum model

Atoms quantum model

Hydrogen atom quantum mechanical model

Hydrogen atom quantum model

Quantum Mechanics Model Systems and the Hydrogen Atom

Quantum mechanical model of atom

Quantum mechanical model of the atom

Quantum mechanics model of the atom

Quantum model

Quantum model of the atom

Quantum modeling

Quantum-mechanical model atoms with orbitals

The Quantum-Mechanical Model Atoms with Orbitals

© 2024 chempedia.info