Asynchronous execution:

The design and synthesis of software for distributed systems requires the use of a design methodology and programming language which builds on the inherent parallel nature of such systems. Formal methods applied to the design of software for distributed processors lead to the identification of processes, capable of asynchronous execution,... 

Asynchronously The request has been sent the action will be scheduled for execution later, and its completion may be awaited separately. 

Asynchronous Transfer of Control (ATC) is a mechanism that allows the execution of an abortable part to be cancelled by a triggering event (time event or another task), in which case an optional sequence of code can be executed after the abortable part is left. 

Asynchronous task control is a simple and efficient capability to suspend and resume the execution of another task. 

Constmctions that are difficult to analyze, such as dynamic tasks and protected objects, task entries, dynamic priorities, select statements, asynchronous transfer of control, relative delays, or calendar clock, are forbidden. It allows memory usage and execution to be deterministic. 

Rather than having a language whose purpose is to run a machine the language should naturally describe what objects there are and what actions they are taking. Objects are inherently distributed and their interactions asynchronous with real time, event-driven behavior. This implies that one could define a system and its own definition would have the necessary behaviors to characterize natural behavior in terms of real time execution semantics. Application developers would no longer need to explicitly define schedules of when events were to occur. Events would instead occur when objects interact with other objects. By describing the interactions between objects the schedule of events is inherently defined. 

An important problem in safety-critical software development results from its ever increasing complexity and from the fact that software functions often interact strongly with different contexts in event-based systems. This can be a physical context (e.g. a monitored and controlled device), human users in an organizational context, or other software and hardware (e.g. a device driver). Other factors increasing the complexity of this problem are asynchronous communication with and within the system, event-driven behaviour, complex data types, timing constraints, parallel execution and non-deterministic behaviour of the system under test. Testing event-driven software thus faces special challenges. In summary, the characteristics of event-driven, safety-critical software are ... 

Each process (or processor) in a spatially or functionally distributed system may be equipped with local data acquisition or control interfaces. If each process is operated independently without communications with other processes then the system is said to be decoupled and each process can only operate asynchronously and autonomously and execute its local function only. Unfortunately, few practical applications have the characteristics necessary for decoupled control. 

Now specify tighter constraints - faster clock and tighter max delay constraints for asynchronous paths. Execute report constraints, report timing and analyze your results. Do not specify unrealistic constraints, like max delay 0 for instance. Instead, gradually tighten constraints. If the current timing is 8 ns. First tiy, say 6.5, if that is met (rather easily, in short compile time), then be more aggressive, say, 5.0 and so on. 

In accordance with experimental observations, the model assumes that cells migrate by executing persistent random walks [49,121,122] as they go through their division cycle. In a uniform environment, the direction after each turn is randomly selected. However, cell movement can be biased to simulate chemotaxis or haptotaxis. If the cell does not collide with another cell, this persistent random movement continues until the end of the cell s current division cycle upon which the cell stops and divides into two daughter cells. Cell division is asynchronous and the distribution of cell division time tj is a measurable characteristic of each cell phenotype. 

The part of first group the management of commucation serial line protocol is. Standardized communication protocol is a precondition for a stable and resilient communication between devices. Communication between BluesenseAD and the computer is executed on a arrhythmic seridl line in the both directions, that means duplex. Type of transmission is commonly referred as asynchronous but the correct name is arrhythmical because between the facilities there is some synchronization in the form of special marks at the beginning and end of the frame. [6] For the detection of communication errors cyclic redundancy sum CRC (Cyclic Redundancy Check) is used which even allows, in some cases, to correct transmission error [7]. 

The OBSW executes inside the On-Board Computer (OBC), and commands and controls the various equipment through the different I/O lines, synchronous/asynchronous RS-422 serial cable, and MIL-STD-1553 bus. The OBC, provided by QinetiQ Space, hosts a 50 MHz LEON2-FT processor, as well as 64 MB SDRAM, 128 KB PROM, and 4 MB Flash memory to hold both the OBSW and configuration tables. 

Railway applications are characterized by a set of asynchronous sequential processes and communicate through variables specialized to achieve a common goal. A state machine models each sequential process. Applications (256 inputs/outputs maximum) create networks containing in the order of several hundred states and transitions. The places correspond to the variables of system states. The occurrence of an event reflects a change of system state and a transition. The variables are Boolean (with some exceptions). They are updated during every elementary system cycle (execution cycle 100 milliseconds). 

The architecture body contains any number of concurrent statements -components and internal blocks are also of this type. These statements can be considered to be executing asynchronously and completely independently of each other. It is therefore crucial to understand how the relationships between different concurrent statements are going to affect not only the behaviour but also the logical structure of the hardware that synthesis will produce. 

The Process statement part may only contain sequential statements such as If-Else, Case and For Loop (Chapter 6). These are executed in the order in which they appear and the behaviour will be modelled with combinational and/ or sequential (synchronous or asynchronous) logic. 

In order to met the extremely time-critical nature of the tasks at the remote site while still providing sufficient flexibility to handle the many possible classes and combinations of anomalous real-time events, asynchronous production systems executing on a concurrent computer wiii be advocated as computational framework for real-time, event driven expert control systems [1,2]. 

---