Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Array experiments samples

Spike-ins are usually RNA transcripts used to calibrate measurements in a DNA microarray experiment. Each spike-in is designed to hybridize with a specific control probe on the target array. Manufacturers of commercially available microarrays typically offer companion RNA spike-ins kits . Known amounts of RNA spike-ins are mixed with the experiment sample during preparation. Subsequently the measured degree of hybridization between the spike-ins and the control probes is used to normalize the hybridization measurements of the sample RNA. [Pg.1154]

The dry lab portion of microarray analyses involves identifying the hybridized spots on the scanned tiff images (gridding) and defining the area and portion of the spot that should be quantified. Most often, mean or median pixel intensities for each spot are extracted from the tiff images. The result is a separate numeric value for each spot and each sample that represents the relative amount of sample hybridized to that spot. Thus, the raw results from an array experiment can be thousands... [Pg.33]

A hybridizing probe in an SBH experiment has completely random access to the data set (sequence), locating matching sequence strings anywhere within the target. This random access allows efficient parallel data processing, with the potential for thousands of probe-DNA hybridizations to be conducted simultaneously on a probe-or DNA-array or many other ways. One approach is to hybridize one labeled probe or probe sets at a time with arrays of samples [see,e.g., 12,19). Alternately, a single labeled sample can be hybridized with an array of probes [see,... [Pg.84]

The use of a common reference RNA allows for the comparison of data between various array experiments. Typically a pool of RNA derived from a variety of tissues is used as a reference sample. Efforts are being made to implement common standards (MIAME, minimal information about a microarray experiment) for transcript profiling through the MGED Society to enable data sharing between different groups [50]. [Pg.641]

Note The amount of sample is primarily a function of the size of the dye aliquots provided commercially (require 1 mg of protein per labeling reaction) rather than the amount used in the array experiments. [Pg.136]

The MALDI-MS spot-on-a-chip sample preparation platform has been applied to protein array experiments, by microdispensing of a recombinant single-chain variable fragment (scFv) antibody specific for choleratoxin onto a nitrocellulose-coated nanovial array chip (Figure 49.12). This concept has later been considerably expanded by use of porous silicon as an arraying substrate by Ressine et The implementation of microfluidic array-based antibody assays to MALDI-MS... [Pg.1355]

Given the advanced state of wave-profile detectors, it seems safe to recognize that the descriptions given by such an apparatus provide a necessary, but overly restricted, picture. As is described in later chapters of this book, shock-compressed matter displays a far more complex face when probed with electrical, magnetic, or optical techniques and when chemical changes are considered. It appears that realistic descriptive pictures require probing matter with a full array of modern probes. The recovery experiment in which samples are preserved for post-shock analysis appears critical for the development of a more detailed defective solid scientific description. [Pg.67]

Tomato root growth bloassay of leaf extracts. Three hundred mg samples of fully expanded leaves were taken from each plant studied. Each sample was ground with a Polytron1 in 30 ml of distilled water and the extract was filtered. Five ml aliquots of each extract were pipetted onto three layers of germination paper in a 10 by 10 by 1.5 cm plastic petri dish. Distilled water was used as a control treatment. Twelve tomato seeds were placed in a 3x4 array in each dish, and incubated at 20C for 168 hours, prior to root measurement. The experimental design was a completely randomized design with five replications (dishes) per treatment except the control which had 10 replications. The experiment was repeated each week for 9 weeks. [Pg.223]


See other pages where Array experiments samples is mentioned: [Pg.333]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.1367]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.1085]    [Pg.1087]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.564]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.1691]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.766]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.878]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.497]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.1088 ]




SEARCH



Array experiments

© 2024 chempedia.info