Anionic transfer copolymerizations

In many cases of start reactions, a monomer is added on to the initiator to form an active center. The active center may be an anion, cation, or free radical in addition polymerization, or, for example, an electron-deficient compound or an unoccupied ligand position in polyinsertion (see Chapter 19). Spontaneous thermal addition polymerizations of monomers which proceed in the absence of added catalyst or initiator are relatively rare. The free radical thermal polymerization of styrene (Chapter 20) and the charge transfer copolymerization of monomers of opposed polarities (Chapter 22) are examples of genuine spontaneous polymerizations. These genuine spontaneous polymerizations can often only be distinguished with difficulty from nongenuine spontaneous polymerizations which are started by unsuspected impurities remaining in these systems. 

Anionic polymerization of polystyrene takes place very rapidly- much faster than free radical polymerization. When practiced on a large scale, this gives rise to heat transfer problems and limits its commercial practice to special cases, such as block copolymerization by living reactions. We employ anionic polymerization to make tri-block copolymer rubbers such as polystyrene-polybutadiene-polystyrene. This type of synthetic rubber is widely used in the handles of power tools, the soft grips of pens, and the elastic side panels of disposable diapers. 

For any specific type of initiation (i.e., radical, cationic, or anionic) the monomer reactivity ratios and therefore the copolymer composition equation are independent of many reaction parameters. Since termination and initiation rate constants are not involved, the copolymer composition is independent of differences in the rates of initiation and termination or of the absence or presence of inhibitors or chain-transfer agents. Under a wide range of conditions the copolymer composition is independent of the degree of polymerization. The only limitation on this generalization is that the copolymer be a high polymer. Further, the particular initiation system used in a radical copolymerization has no effect on copolymer composition. The same copolymer composition is obtained irrespective of whether initiation occurs by the thermal homolysis of initiators such as AIBN or peroxides, redox, photolysis, or radiolysis. Solvent effects on copolymer composition are found in some radical copolymerizations (Sec. 6-3a). Ionic copolymerizations usually show significant effects of solvent as well as counterion on copolymer composition (Sec. 6-4). 

Most of the methods for synthesizing block copolymers were described previously. Block copolymers are obtained by step copolymerization of polymers with functional end groups capable of reacting with each other (Sec. 2-13c-2). Sequential polymerization methods by living radical, anionic, cationic, and group transfer propagation were described in Secs. 3-15b-4, 5-4a, and 7-12e. The use of telechelic polymers, coupling and transformations reactions were described in Secs. 5-4b, 5-4c, and 5-4d. A few methods not previously described are considered here. 

Copolymerizations initiated by lithium metal should give the same product as produced from lithium alkyls. Usually the radical ends produced by electron transfer initiation have so short a lifetime they can have no influence on the copolymerization. This is true for instance in the copolymerization of isoprene and styrene (50). The product is identical if initiated by lithium metal or by butyllithium. With the styrene-methylmethacrylate system, however, differences are observed (79,80,82). Whereas the butyllithium initiated copolymer contains no styrene at low conversions, the one initiated by lithium metal has a high styrene content if the reaction is carried out in bulk and a moderate one even in tetrahydrofuran. These facts led O Driscoll and Tobolsky (80) to suggest that initiation with lithium occurs by electron exchange and that in this case the radical ends are sufficiently long-lived to produce simultaneous radical and anionic reactions at opposite ends of the chain. Only in certain rather exceptional circumstances would the free radical reaction be of importance. Some of the conditions required have been discussed by Tobolsky and Hartley (111). The anionic reaction should be slow. This is normally true for lithium based catalysts in hydrocarbon solvents. No evidence of appreciable radical participation is observed for initiation by sodium and potassium. The monomers should show a fast radical reaction. If styrene is replaced by isoprene, no isoprene is found in the copolymer for isoprene polymerizes slowly by free radical initiation. Most important of all, initiation should be slow to produce a low steady concentration of radical-anions. An initiator which produces an almost instantaneous and complete electron transfer to monomer produces a high radical concentration which will ensure their rapid mutual termination. 

At present, we can say that copolymerization initiated by various salts proceeds by an anionic mechanism, after dissociation of the initiators in the reaction medium. The primary step is the addition of the initiator anion to the epoxide. In the initiation by Lewis bases, i.e. by tertiary amines, initiation involves formation of a primary active centre of an anionic character. This active centre is probably generated by interaction of the tertiary amine with the anhydride and an allyl alcohol. The allyl alcohol can be formed by a base-catalyzed isomerization of the epoxide. In the presence of a proton donor, the formation of active centres is possible through interaction of tertiary amine, anhydride and proton donor without epoxide isomerization. Another way of initiation consists in a direct reaction of epoxide with tertiary amine yielding an anionic primary active centre. We believe that in both kinds of initiation in the strict absence of proton donors, the growing chain end has the character of a living polymer. The presence of proton donors, however, gives rise to transfer reactions. 

Haddleton determined the reactivity ratios for copolymerization of MMA with BMA by classical anionic as 1.04 0.81 by alkyllithium/trialkylalu-minum initiation, 1.10 0.72 by GTP, 1.76 0.67 by ATRP, 0.98 1.26 by catalytic chain transfer, 0.75 0.98 by classical free radical, 0.93 1.22 [39]. The difference in reactivity ratios between GTP and classical anionic polymerization seems to indicate GTP is an associative process. However, Jenkins has also measured reactivity ratios for the same pair by GTP and reports different results rMMA=0.44 and rBMA=0.26 [40]. 

Pentadienyl-terminated poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) as well as PSt, 12, have been prepared by radical polymerization via addition-fragmentation chain transfer mechanism, and radically copolymerized with St and MMA, respectively, to give PSt-g-PMMA and PMMA-g-PSt [17, 18]. Metal-free anionic polymerization of tert-butyl acrylate (TBA) initiated with a carbanion from diethyl 2-vinyloxyethylmalonate produced vinyl ether-functionalized PTBA macromonomer, 13 [19]. 

The outcome of charge-transfer polymerizations has been systematized by Iwatsuki and Yamashita in their penetrating early review [130]. They arrived at a correlation of polymerization behavior with the value of the EDA complex equilibrium constant, Keq, With weak donor and acceptor olefins, no spontaneous polymerization takes place, while the addition of a radical initiator results in a random or an alternating copolymer depending on the value of Keq. As the donor and acceptor strength of the olefins increases, spontaneous initiation rates for radical copolymerization increase and with even stronger donor and acceptor olefins, ionic homopolymerization takes place (cationic and/or anionic). 

Cyanoxyl radicals were generated in situ by an electron-transfer reaction between cyanate anions and p-chlorobenzenediazonium cations arenediazonium salts were previously prepared in water through the diazotization reaction of p-chloroaniline. Copolymerizations were performed using the Step 2 product and acrylamide at 50°C with ClCgPLtNi BF4 /NaOCN as the initiating system. Copolymers were isolated by precipitation in a 10-fold excess of methanol and characterized. 

The telechelica,(i -bis(2,6-dimethylphenol)-poly(2,6-dimethylphenyl-ene oxide) (PP0-20H) [174-182] is of interest as a precursor in the synthesis of block copolymers [175] and thermally reactive oligomers [179]. The synthesis has been accomplished by five methods. The first synthetic method was the reaction of a low molecular weight PPO with one phenol chain end with 3,3, 5,5 -tetramethyl-l,4-diphenoquinone. This reaction occurred by a radical mechanism [174]. The second method was the electrophilic condensation of the phenyl chain ends of two PPO-OH molecules with formaldehyde [177,178], The third method consists of the oxidative copolymerization of 2,6-dimethylphenol with 2,2 -di(4-hydroxy-3,5-di-methylphenyl)propane [176-178]. This reaction proceeds by a radical mechanism. A fourth method was the phase transfer-catalyzed polymerization of 4-bromo-2,6-dimethylphenol in the presence of 2,2-di(4-hy-droxy-3,5-dimethylphenyl)propane [181]. This reaction proceeded by a radical-anion mechanism. The fifth method developed was the oxidative coupling polymerization of 2,6-dimethylphenol (DMP) in the presence of tetramethyl bisphenol-A (TMBPA) [Eq. (57)] [182],... 

Sonochemical homopolymerization of dichlorosilanes in the presence of sodium is successful at ambient temperatures in nonpolar aromatic solvents (toluene or xylenes) only for monomers with a-aryl substituents. Dialky 1-dichlorosilanes do not react with dispersed sodium under these conditions, but they can be copolymerized with phenylmethyldichlorosilane. Copolymers with a 30-45% content of dialkylsilanes were formed from equimolar mixtures of the corresponding comonomers. Copolymerization might indicate anionic intermediates. A chloroterminated chain end in the polymerization of phenylmethyldichlorosilane can participate in a two-electron-transfer process with sodium (or rather two subsequent steps separated by a low-energy barrier). The resulting silyl anion can react with both dichlorosilanes. The presence of a phenyl group in either a or P position in chloroterminated polysilane allows reductive coupling, in contrast to peralkyl species, which do not allow the reaction. Therefore, dialkyl monomers can copolymerize, but they cannot homopolymerize under sonochemical conditions. 

---