Analytical run

It must be remarked that terminology is not consistent and there are many widely used synon)ms. Quality control in this Chapter refers to practices best described as internal quality control. Quahty assessment is often referred to as external quality control, proficiency testing, interlaboratory comparisons, round robins or other terms. Internal Quality Control and External Quality Assessment are preferred because they best describe the objectives for which the RMs are being used, i.e. the immediate and active control of the results being reported from an analytical run or event, and an objective, retrospective assessment of the quality of those results. 

Concentrations of terbacil and its Metabolites A, B and C are calculated from a calibration curve for each analyte run concurrently with each sample set. The equation of the line based on the peak height of the standard versus nanograms injected is generated by least-squares linear regression analysis performed using Microsoft Excel. 

The instrument used to generate the data shown in Figures 1 and 2 (LECO Pegasus III GC x GC-ToF-MS) has a modulator at the end of the first 30 mx 0.25 mm non-polar column (HP-5MS, 0.25 pm film thickness). As compounds elute from this column, the modulator concentrates them over a short period to focus them and then sends them down the second, shorter and narrower 2 m x 0.10 mm, polar column (BPX-50, 0.10 pm film thickness) situated in its own oven compartment within the main oven. This operation is repeated throughout the analytical run. Having the two columns coupled in this way allows compounds to be separated by volatility on the first analytical column and by polarity on the second column. Hence for complex mixtures, peaks with a similar (or identical) retention on the first column can be separated by the second column. Non-polar compounds emerge before polar components. 

Progress in all areas of additive analysis is very much associated with instrumental development. The last few years have seen major developments in the sensitivity of LC-MS and other MS-based techniques. Such developments are sure to continue. On the down side these analytical techniques provide a large amount of information obtainable per analytical run and therefore there is an increasing need for more automated accurate analytical equipment to improve data management. 

There are many uncertainties in the use of bioassay methods, not the least of these being the genetic stability of the assay organisms. Stock cultures cannot be treated like chemical reagents, to be put back on the shelf and forgotten between analytical runs. This is an area of analysis best left to the microbiologists if the information is absolutely necessary, the maintenance of cultures and the actual assay should not be left solely in the hands analytical chemists. 

The software tools accompanying the QTRAP MS/MS allow set-up of multiple selected reaction monitoring (SRM) transitions for all likely metabolites after the major product ion transitions for the dosed compound are known. Because QTRAP MS/MS can monitor up to 100 SRM transitions during a single assay, the SRM transitions required for quantitation of the dosed compound and internal standard are obtained along with the possible metabolite transitions. During sample analysis, when a possible metabolite transition exceeds a preset threshold value, the QTRAP MS/MS performs an enhanced product ion (EPI) scan. When the assay is complete, the EPI scans can be used to determine whether the hits are metabolites, and if they are metabolites, what part of the molecule has changed. Thus, one analytical run provides both quantitative and metabolite information. 

Because of the cost of primary standards, it is normal to use them very sparingly (certainly not as calibration standards), but to include them as unknowns in the analytical run as a measure of the quality of the analysis (see QA, below). Even so, this becomes prohibitively expensive, and it is common to use materials which can be included in each analysis, which may not be fully certified, but whose values can be related to a primary standard. These are often referred to as in-house standards, although they may be more generally available. They can be home-made, providing sufficient attention has been paid to homogenizing the material thoroughly. A simple example is... 

Following the first run, in which components are transferred from the precolumn to the on-line cold trap, the system will reset to a second method and, on becoming ready, the cold trap is desorbed and the analytical run automatically started. 

It is possible to determine the recovery that is obtained during an analytical run. Internationally harmonised guidelines have been prepared which indicate how... 

How frequently are control materials (CRMs, blanks, IHRM etc.) incorporated in the analytical run ... 

Do you randomise your samples in an analytical run (including duplicates). Section 5 Method validation... 

By plotting the sum T and difference D in time ordered sequence the variation of random and systematic errors can be monitored between analytical runs. 

Selecting the placement of Q.C. samples within the anaytical run depends upon the purpose of the Q.C. program. While random placement is statistically justified, it may not provide sufficient diagnostic information. If instrumental drift is an important concern (as it is in many automated, operator unattended techniques) the two Q.C. samples should be spaced at intervals that are appropriate to detect the anticipated drift. Placement near the beginning and end of the analytical run has been been beneficial in detecting instrumental drift. By bracketing groups of routine samples with Q.C. samples it is easy to identify specific samples that require re-analysis. 

Figure 6.3 Analyte run in eluent (a) CH3CN H2O TEA and (b) CH3CN H2O TFAiTEA.

Prior to any analytical run, the column must be washed with full strength component B in order to free the column of any impurities remaining from earlier run(s). In general, a 10 minute wash at the flow rates shown in Table 3 will be sufficient. The column is then equilibrated with the starting composition of the solvent to be used for as long as it takes to obtain a steady baseline (2-4 column volumes). The material is injected and the desired gradient is run followed by a wash (2-4 column volumes) at the highest concentration of component B before reequilibration to initial conditions. 

Bioanalytical method validation and definition of the acceptance criteria for the analytical run and/or batch... 

Analytical run (or batch) a complete set of analytical and study samples with the appropriate number of standards and QCs for their validation. Several runs (or batches) may be completed in one day, or one run (or batch) may take several days to complete. 

Within-run, intrabatch precision or repeatability, which assesses precision during a single analytical run... 

Postpreparative Stability. The stability of processed samples, including the resident time in the autosampler, should be determined. The stability of the drug and the internal standard should be assessed over the anticipated run time for the batch size in validation samples by determining concentrations on the basis of original calibration standards. Reinjection reproducibility should be evaluated to determine if an analytical run could be reanalyzed in the case of instrument failure. 

Therefore, before performing an analytical run to analyze the analyte, it is suggested that the LC-MS interface be cleaned. These problems are partially avoided if the FIA method (see Section 13.2.2) is used for tuning. 

Using a graduated cylinder, measure 300 ml deionized water into a vacuum flask. Add 700 ml HPLC-grade acetonitrile to the flask. Mix solution with stir bar and magnetic stir plate. Degas the mobile phase daily in an ultrasonic bath under vacuum or using an in-line degasser. Prepare fresh for each analytical run. 

---