Analytical chemistry, hypothesis

It is unnecessary to delve into hypothesis testing strategies further to discern the role of values in the choice of decision rules. The following are immediately noteworthy. First, whether one observes analytical chemistry, an old and well established discipline, or chemical oncology, a relatively recent one, the observer is struck by the fact that making odds is an indispensable step of the process of converting data to information. This fact alone establishes beyond reasonable doubt that science is no less subjective than other rational human endeavors. 

There are two main families of statistical tests parametric tests, which are based on the hypothesis that data are distributed according to a normal curve (on which the values in Student s table are based), and non-parametric tests, for more liberally distributed data (robust statistics). In analytical chemistry, large sets of data are often not available. Therefore, statistical tests must be applied with judgement and must not be abused. In chemistry, acceptable margins of precision are 10, 5 or 1%. Greater values than this can only be endorsed depending on the problem concerned. 

The point about this example is that all analytical chemistry should be fit for purpose. When you make a decision based on a statistical test, the choice of the probability level at which the null hypothesis is rejected is made by the user, not by a book or software package. Do not adopt probability levels blindly, but consider the risk of making the different types of error. 

Hartmann, C., Smeyers Verbeke, J., Penninckx, W., VanderHeyden, Y., Venkeerberghen, P., and Massart, D.L. (1995) Reappraisal of hypothesis testing for method validation detection of systematic error by comparing the means of two methods or two laboratories. Analytical Chemistry, 67, 4491 4499. 

Ribas B, Pelayo JF and Rodrigues NL (1988) New data on tho hypothesis of the brain participation in iron homeostasis. In Bratter P and Schramel P, eds. Trace Elements in Analytical Chemistry and Medicinal Biology Vol. 5, pp. 548-555. Walter de Gruyter Co., Berlin-New York. 

Determine whether temperature has a statistical effect on the decomposition of cinnamaldehyde using analysis of variance (ANOVA). (For how to perform ANOVA,. see S. R. Crouch and F. J. Holler. Applications of Microsoft Excel in Analytical Chemistry, Chap. 3, Belmont, CA Brooks/ Cole, 2004.) In the same wtty, determine if time of heating has an effect, (h) Using the data in part (g), assume that decomposition begins at 60°C and test the hypothesis that there is no effect of temperature or time. 

In reviewing the history of detection limits (in Analytical Chemistry) it is helpful to keep these several, often implicit, differences in mind. If it Is agreed that the concept of detection has meaning, then it is essential that the above questions be fully defined and explicitly addressed. In the view of this author a meaningful approach to analyte detection must be consistent with our approach to uncertainty components of measurement processes and experimental results the soundest approach is probably the last [hypothesis testing] tempered with an appropriate measure of the first [scientific intuition]. 

One can read the research reports described above with a technical fascination for the advances in analytical chemistry that enable scientists to monitor such remarkably low concentrations. Or a reader might be intrigued with the explanation that ocean currents can transport a persistent contaminant far from its point of origin over a period of decades or centuries. More to the point, these data support a simple hypothesis because PFOS is highly soluble and persistent, ocean waters [54] and potential sorption to sediments can serve as the ultimate sink for PFOS with consequent exposure by aquatic organisms. 

With the hypothesis and confidence level selected, the next step is to apply the chosen test. For outliers, one test used (perhaps even abused) in analytical chemistry is the Q or Dixon test ... 

The term s will refer to the random error associated with the variable response, and, finally, the model,/(x), is a mathematical function that relates y to X. It is a working hypothesis and must be modified if the experimental data are against it. In analytical chemistry we assume some sort of cause (level of the property)-and-effect (signal variation) relation and, hence, it is reasonable to accept that the model for the observed experimental responses isy=/(x)+ , where f(x) is the standardization (calibration) curve to be estimated from the experimental data points. Of course, for each measurement we can state yi=f(Xi) + , i= 1,.., N, where x y, are the data pairs associated with each calibrator. 

The methods you select, whether instrumental or wet chemistry, must provide data that helps you answer a question related to the hypothesis. Ideally, the methods go right to the heart of the problem, to detect or measure an analyte central to the hypothesis. Ideally, the problem has a handle you can try to measure. (We use the term handle to describe the problem s key attribute. If a sample is offcolor, the color is the handle you want to use to solve the problem. If you have bulging drums, the gas causing the pressure is the handle. )... 

Consequently, a more fundamental question arises Why should one apply mass spectrometry to supramolecules What is the motivation and what is the added value of using this method together with other techniques that are maybe more commonly used in supramolecular chemistry The present chapter elaborates on the hypothesis that the potential of mass spectrometry goes far beyond the analytical characterization of complexes with respect to their exact masses, charge states, stoichiometries, or purity. In fact, the information that can be gained is complementary to other methods such as NMR spectroscopy and includes structural aspects, reactivity, and even thermochemistry. Examination of supramolecules by mass spectrometry involves their transfer into the high vacuum of the mass spectrometer and thus implies that isolated particles are investigated. There is no... 

Typically in radioanalytical chemistry, the null hypothesis is the hypothesis that no analyte is in the sample. Even if no analyte is present, the net result of the measurement has uncertainty, and, if the measurement were repeated a number of times, a distribution of results about zero, including both positive and negative values, should be observed. Although results near zero are most likely, in principle there is no upper or lower bound for what the result might be. Observation of a positive result in a single measurement does not necessarily constitute strong evidence that the analyte is present. The result must exceed some positive threshold value, called the critical value, to lead one to conclude that the analyte is really present. The question is how to determine the critical value ... 

Before choosing the critical value, one specifies one s tolerance for Type I errors, defined as erroneous rejection of the null hypothesis when it is true. Type I errors are sometimes called/fltoe positives or false rejections. Regardless of the choice of the critical value, there is always the probability of a Type I error. For large enough critical values, this probability is small and generally can be tolerated. The tolerable probability that one specifies is called the significance level of the test and is usually denoted by a. In radioanalytical chemistry, it is common to set a = 0.05. If O = 0.05, then analyte-free samples should produce false positive results at a rate of only about one per twenty measurements. 

Since we are not able to study the internal constitution of atoms by the kind of methods we might use to study the internal constitution of a tape worm by dissection and abstraction from what we observe, models of atomic innards caimot be analytical in the above sense. Nor can they be iconic, since to project only one of the properties of product electrons back in to the structure of an atom is to commit the second mereological fallacy. Clearly, the planetary electron hypothesis, if taken seriously as a contribution to our knowledge of the internal constitution of atoms, is an example of that fallacy. The only remaining possibility is Mulliken s inspired proposal that we clearly disassociate ourselves from electrons and their orbits by proposing a pregnant new concept - that of the orbital . It reminds us of the history of quantum chemistry from its beginnings in Bohrian orbits , but offers a purely formal model of the structure of chemical entities. 

---