Analysis solvent optimization

Colenut and Thorburn [51,52] have also described the procedure using gas stripping of the aqueous sample followed by adsorption onto active carbon from which surface they are taken up in an organic solvent for gas chromatographic analysis. They optimized conditions for the determination of parts per billion of pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls. 

Moret et al. (67,68) studied all the parameters that influence amine recovery under conditions where a liquid-liquid purification step with an organic solvent follows the acid extraction, prior to derivatization with DBS and RP-HPLC analysis. The optimized methods of sample preparation for different foods, including cheese, meat, and fish, are given. The same research group (69) optimized the extraction conditions for Phe, Put, Cad, His, Tyr, Spe, and Spd. Food samples were first mixed with TCA and centrifuged and then basified and extracted with BuOH/CHCl3 (1 1). The BAs were then derivatized with DNS and separated on a Spherisorb 3S TG column with an ACN-H20 gradient. The method was applied to samples of tuna, salmon, and salami. 

Typically splitless injection is used for trace analysis by capillary GC. Splitless injections can exhibit problems with carryover, poor repeatability, and labile analytes. Penton (1991) reports improved results with the temperature-programmable injector. With a temperature-programmable injector, samples are injected into a glass insert at an injector temperature below the boiling point of the analysis solvent the injector temperature is then rapidly programmed to a higher value. Penton reported this technique offered greater ease of optimization and improved precision. 

Different reversed phase [195,239,240], mixed mode (ion exchange and reversed phase) SPE cartridges [173,218] and online SPE column [193, 238] have been also reported for samples preparation and extraction. Some of these assays combined both PP and SPE in order to achieve an extensive sample cleanup [193, 195, 238-240], Likewise SPE, LLE provides cleaner plasma extracts than PP. Nevertheless, LLE procedure does not always provide satisfactory results with regard to extraction recovery and selectivity, especially with polar analytes and particularly in the case of multicomponent analysis such as in drug-metabolism studies, where analytes polarity varies widely. This issue was addressed by Zweigenbaum J and Henion J [235] and extraction solvent optimization, using isoamyl alcohol, to achieve acceptable extraction selectivity and recovery for polar analytes has been discussed. 

The performance of the TSP interface is determined by many interrelated experimental parameters, such as solvent composition, flow-rate, vaporizer temperature, repeller potential, and ion source temperature. These parameters have to be optimized with the solvent composition nsed in the analysis. This optimization procedure is often performed by column-bypass injections, in order to save valuable analysis time. However, for several compounds the spectral appearance may differ between column-bypass and on-column injection, owing to the influence of subtle differences in solvent composition or matrix effects. 

Coetzee, J.R., Hussam, A. and Petrick, T.R. (1983). Extension of potentiometric stripping analysis to electropositive elements by solvent optimization. Anal. Chem. 55,120. 

Historically, the electropolymerization of thiophene and bithiophene was first mentioned in 1982 [19] and 1983 [20], respectively. Following this initial work, many studies have been devoted to the analysis and optimization of the electropolymerization reaction. These studies have shown that the electropolymerization reaction is strongly dependent on experimental variables such as the solvent, concentration of reagents, temperature, nature and geometry of the working electrodes and applied electrical conditions [10]. 

From this further analysis, the actual amount of waste (and its nature) per kilogram of product will become evident. At this stage it is also important to look forward and assess options for recycling or reusing the waste on site for example if a solvent can be efficiently recovered then this should be taken into account in calculating the E-factor. Although the choice of which route to fully optimize may not be obvious even from this further analysis, it will facilitate a reasoned discussion of the issues. 

In the past, no snitable analytical methodologies were capable of investigating these multiple reactions and even today, the complete extraction and analysis of all the componnds is still a difficult task. The methods for extraction must be optimized for each sample according to the solubility of either phytylated (chlorophylls and pheophytins) or dephytylated (chlorophyllides and pheophorbides) derivatives, often requiring several repeated steps and the use of a single or a mixture of organic solvents. 

For pesticide residue immunoassays, matrices may include surface or groundwater, soil, sediment and plant or animal tissue or fluids. Aqueous samples may not require preparation prior to analysis, other than concentration. For other matrices, extractions or other cleanup steps are needed and these steps require the integration of the extracting solvent with the immunoassay. When solvent extraction is required, solvent effects on the assay are determined during assay optimization. Another option is to extract in the desired solvent, then conduct a solvent exchange into a more miscible solvent. Immunoassays perform best with water-miscible solvents when solvent concentrations are below 20%. Our experience has been that nearly every matrix requires a complete validation. Various soil types and even urine samples from different animals within a species may cause enough variation that validation in only a few samples is not sufficient. 

Fixed pathlength transmission flow-cells for aqueous solution analysis are easily clogged. Attenuated total reflectance (ATR) provides an alternative method for aqueous solution analysis that avoids this problem. Sabo et al. [493] have reported the first application of an ATR flow-cell for both NPLC and RPLC-FUR. In micro-ATR-IR spectroscopy coupled to HPLC, the trapped effluent of the HPLC separation is added dropwise to the ATR crystal, where the chromatographic solvent is evaporated and the sample is enriched relative to the solution [494], Detection limits are not optimal. The ATR flow-cell is clearly inferior to other interfaces. 

---