Analysis of Problem-Solving Experience

The analysis of problem-solving experience that has taken place so far has been based on finding subproblems within an existing branching structure that, when solved, will produce subtrees that satisfy the definitions of dominance and equivalence. As we have noted, this is insufficient for generating new dominance and equivalence conditions because we... 

Once diffraction data have been gathered the next stage in the structure analysis is usually focused on seeking a definition of the orientation of the particle and, often, its position in the crystal cell. This information is essential for both phase refinement and the analysis of isomorphous replacement experiments. Because of the inevitable noncrystallographic redundancy (a minimum of 5-fold) and the fixed relationship between the various icosahedral symmetry axes it is often possible to solve the orientation problem by analysis of the diffraction data in the absence of a model, usually by use of a self-rotation function. 

Unfortunately, until now the MEIS-based dynamic programming method has found application only in the analysis of problems of technical and economic optimization (optimal synthesis) of circuits. This particular application, however, allowed a valuable experience to be accumulated in solving the most important DP problem, namely the search for extremum of the non-additive function. We will exemplify complexities and effectiveness of applying dynamic programming by the scheme in Fig. 3,a that was already used in the MEIS-based analysis of hydraulic circuits. 

In recent years, techniques for direct analysis of the non-polymer components have developed apace and it has become increasingly important for scientists, engineers and technicians to have a basic grounding in these methods. This treatise is concerned with the in situ characterisation of additives embedded in a broad variety of polymeric matrices and evaluates critically the extensive problem-solving experience and state-of-the-art in the polymer industry. Despite well-deserved attention and considerable efforts direct polymer/additive analysis (without separation) has not yet turned into a great many general and routinely workable concepts. Nevertheless, the future foresees a greater share for in-polymer analysis. 

Recognizing this is essential in the design of experiments and analysis of the results. The rapid pace of improvements and iimovation in electronic devices and computers have provided die experimenter with electronic solutions to experimental problems diat in the past could only be solved with custom hardware. 

Thus, the next step in the problem-solving analysis is to use information about the domain of the problem, in this case flowshop scheduling, and information about dominance and equivalence conditions that is pertinent to the overall problem formulation, in this case as a state space, to convert the experience into a form that can be used in the future problem-solving activity. 

This volume on "Molecular Characterization and Analysis of Polymers" has been edited by John M. Chalmers and Robert J. Meier, both of whom have considerable experience in the industrial sector. They have compiled a broad compilation of chapters on the various aspects of polymer analysis and placed a clear and useful emphasis on problem solving, rather than on the techniques used. 

All three units (Inorganic and Physical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Instrumental Analysis and Researching Chemistry) are assessed by your teacher or lecturer. For the first two of these units, your knowledge will usually be assessed by a written test. Your school or college will also collect evidence to show that, during the course, you have demonstrated the skills of scientific enquiry necessary to carry out an experiment and have shown that you have appropriate problem-solving skills. 

Even using uncertainty factors, the problem of determining the reliability of qualitative methods has not be solved because the usual statistical approaches are often not applicable. In residue analysis, this problem is often amplified because concenftations frequently are in the low or even sub-ppb range. Most promising appears to be a model that helps in estimating, in arbitrary units, the overall selectivity of an analytical method on the basis of partial selectivity indices. Selectivity indices are nothing more than a combination of the above-mentioned tools with the experience obtained within the European Union from recognized laboratory experts (26). 

The application of screening experiments is obligatory when operating with a relatively large number of factors (k>7), because in the first phase, it facilitates the inclusion of all those factors that do not affect the response greatly. Thus, they also considerably simplify the research of the factor space-domain and the modeling of the response surface. An active selective method, which may be applied in solving this problem is the analysis of variance. 

---