Amorphous polymer plastic deformation crazing

The mechanisms of plastic deformation at microscopic level of amorphous polymers are mainly crazing and shear yielding [3-5]. In semicrystalline polymers, although the glass transition temperature, density, infrared spectrum and other properties of the amorphous phase interdispersed between the crystalline lamellae are close to those of bulk amorphous polymers, the mechanisms of plastic deformation are very different from those of the amorphous materials, since also the crystalline phase plays a key role [Ij. However, because of the presence of the entangled amorphous phase, the mechanisms of plastic deformation of semicrystalline polymers are also different from those of other crystalline materials (for instance metals). 

Amorphous polymers exhibit two mechanisms of localized plasticity crazing and shear yielding. These are generally thought of separately, with crazing corresponding to a brittle response while shear yielding is associated with ductile behavior and the development of noticeable plastic deformation prior... 

A third method which recently provided considerable insight into the role of crazes in deformation and fracture of amorphous polymers is the optical interference measurement of crazes (preceding a crack). Since the pioneer work of Kambour, this method has been widely used to determine characteristic craze dimensions and critical displacements. W. Doll gives an overview on recent results and on their interpretation in terms of fracture mechanics parameters (stress intensity factor, plastic zone sizes, fracture surface morphology, fracture energy). 

It is well known that the mechanical behavior of glassy amorphous polymers is strongly influenced by hydrostatic pressure. A pronounced change is that polymers, which fracture in a brittle manner, can be made to yield by the application of hydrostatic pressure Additional experimental evidence for the role of a dilatational stress component in crazing in semicrystalline thermoplastics is obtainai by the tests in which hydrostatic pressure suppresses craze nucleation as a result, above a certain critical hydrostatic pressure the material can be plastically deformed. 

The load-displacement curves for C(T) tests of the neat EpoxyH were almost linear until the final unstable fracture. The fracture toughness value in 77K-LNj was 210 J/m and that in RT-air was 120 J/m. Thus the toughness increased by 1.8 times by changing the test environment from RT-air to 77K-LN. Brown and co-workers have found that amorphous polymers crazed in 77K-LNj, but not in a helium or vacuum at about 78K [20-22]. They have also reported that the stress-strain behavior of all polymers, amorphous and crystalline, is affected by at low temperatures [22]. Kneifel has reported that the fracture toughness of epoxy in 77K-LNj is higher than that in RT-air and 5K, and that the reason for this is the reduced notch effect by plastic deformation [23]. Then, the increase of the fracture toughness of the neat EpoxyH in this study is probably caused by the similar effect. 

The selection of the dominant deformation mechanism in the matrix depends not only on the properties of this matrix material but also on the test temperature, strain rate, as well as the size, shape, and internal morphology of the rubber particles (BucknaU 1977, 1997, 2000 Michler 2005 Michler and Balta-Calleja 2012 Michler and Starke 1996). The properties of the matrix material, defined by its chemical structure and composition, determine not rally the type of the local yield zones and plastic deformation mechanisms active but also the critical parameters for toughening. In amorphous polymers which tend to form fibrillated crazes upon deformation, the particle diameter, D, is of primary importance. Several authors postulated that in some other amorphous and semiciystalline polymers with the dominant formation of dUatational shear bands or extensive shear yielding, the other critical parameter can be the interparticle distance (ID) (the thickness of the matrix ligaments between particles) rather than the particle diameter. 

Most hard amorphous polymers under tension show brittle fracture. The strength, ct, is determined under the Griffith equation (Equation (1.3)) by the fracture surface energy, y, which in turn mostly depends on the energy absorbed by the plastic deformation and void formation (crazing) that occurs immediately at the tip of the crack. E is the elastic modulus and c is the crack length ... 

The well-known heterogeneity of amorphous glassy pol5miers plastic deformation [1,2] allows to assume them nonhomogeneous systems. The same affirmation is valid in respect of semicrystalline pol5miers amorphous phase [3,4], As well nevertheless, both models of continues (let us remind, that Ihe known Dugdale model, often used for crazes characteristics, was developed originally for a metals [5]) and molecular concepts, are applied successfully for both classes polymers behavior description. In this cormection ihe question arises about scale, which can be considered as lower boimdary of models of continua applicability. 

Growth of craze-like entities in equatorial disks of spherulites occurs via plastic deformation of the amorphous material between laterally aligned voids that is trmisformed further into fibrils. The thickness and length of these fibrils is related to the amount of the amorphous material between voids and that is comiected m the first approximation with the lamellae thickness. These fibrils may mimic tufts in crazes of amorphous glassy polymers. 

The deformation behavior of amorphous polymers has been studied extensively, partly because the structure is rather simple as compared with semicrystalline polymers thus, the relationship between structure and properties can be established with relative ease. It is well known that two major micromechanisms are involved in the deformation and subsequent fracture of glassy polymers [1,2,13] (see Figs. 18.1 and 18.2). These are crazing and shear yielding, and both involve localized plastic deformation and some energy is dissipated during the deformation. In a craze, polymer chains are stretched along the stress direction and... 

Although the results described above have been observed for thin films under tension and large-strain plastic deformation is usually observed only for localized regions - crazes or shear deformation zones - Meijer has demonstrated that macroscopic plastic deformation can be indeed observed for these amorphous polymers under tension, as far as the thickness of the deformed polymer is less than a critical value [3-8]. Thin... 

---