Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Ammonia water versus

The variation of enthalpy for binary mixtures is conveniently represented on a diagram. An example is shown in Figure 3.3. The diagram shows the enthalpy of mixtures of ammonia and water versus concentration with pressure and temperature as parameters. It covers the phase changes from solid to liquid to vapour, and the enthalpy values given include the latent heats for the phase transitions. [Pg.73]

Figures 21.5a and 21.5b show the drying and settling times of water and ammonia droplets versus the droplet radius. The curves have been shown for three combinations of gas temperatures and vapor pressures and for three initial heights. The simultaneous evaporation and settling of droplets have been taken into account in the computation of the curves. Each settling time curve corresponds to one drying time curve, and each intersection point of these curves corresponds to the maximum radius of a totally evaporating droplet. The vapor pressures in Figs. 21.5a and 21.5b correspond to saturation ratios 0.0012 and 0.058 at a gas temperature of 20°C and to a saturation ratio of 0.12 at a gas temperature of 0°C, for both species. Figures 21.5a and 21.5b show the drying and settling times of water and ammonia droplets versus the droplet radius. The curves have been shown for three combinations of gas temperatures and vapor pressures and for three initial heights. The simultaneous evaporation and settling of droplets have been taken into account in the computation of the curves. Each settling time curve corresponds to one drying time curve, and each intersection point of these curves corresponds to the maximum radius of a totally evaporating droplet. The vapor pressures in Figs. 21.5a and 21.5b correspond to saturation ratios 0.0012 and 0.058 at a gas temperature of 20°C and to a saturation ratio of 0.12 at a gas temperature of 0°C, for both species.
FIGURE 27.5 Drying time and gravitational settling time of water and ammonia droplets versus droplet radius. The curves are shown for three combinations of gas temperature and vapor pressure, and the initial height of droplets ranges from 1 m to 10 m. (Source Kukkonen et ai, 1989)... [Pg.624]

FIGURE 27.7 Number of moles of ammonia vapor and liquid versus time predicted by AERCLOUD, for 85% liquid releases in dry air and in 99.99% humid air allowing for ammonia-water interactions. The initial droplet radius ranges from 1000 /xm to 100 /xm. The curves have been computed using three model options including and excluding droplet ventilation and in the homogeneous equilibrium limit. [Pg.629]

Natural gas enrichment (CO2/CH4 membrane separation) is employed to remove CO2 from natural gas streams as well as for recovering CO2 in enhanced oil recovery processes. Methane recovery from landfill sources is an additional application. Membranes are employed for hydrogen recovery in ammonia ptuge gas, H2/CO ratio adjustments in hydrogen production (HYCO process), in hydrocracker and hydrotreater ptuge gas, and in catalytic reformer off-gas. With the very high permeability of water versus common gases, membranes have fotmd applications for air dehydration and natural gas dehydration. Additional applications include helium recovery and H2S removal from natural gas. [Pg.336]

Agulyansky et al. [492, 493] investigated the complex structure and composition of solid phases precipitated by ammonia solution from experimental and industrial niobium and tantalum strip solutions. Fig. 136 shows isotherms (20°C) of Nb205 content versus pH for solutions prepared by the dissolution of (NH4)3NbOF6 and (NH4)2NbOF5 in water and of Nb metal in... [Pg.293]

Chatterjee et al. [20] quantitatively separated primaquine from amodiquine by a selective precipitation method. A powdered sample containing primaquine and amodiaquine was dissolved in 0.01 N hydrochloric acid 4 N ammonia was added to precipitate amodiaquine. The mixture was filtered and the combined filtrate and washings containing primaquine was diluted with water and 0.1 N hydrochloric acid. The absorbance of this solution was measured at 282 nm versus a solvent blank. [Pg.177]

El-Brashy [51] reported the determination of primaquine and other antimalarials via charge-transfer complexes. Powdered sample of primaquine phosphate was dissolved in water and the solution was adjusted to an alkaline pH with 6 M ammonia and extracted with chloroform. The extract was dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and evaporated to dryness under nitrogen and the residue was dissolved in acetonitrile. Portions of the solution were mixed with 0.2% 7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane, diluted with acetonitrile, and set aside for 10 min before the absorbance was measured at 845 nm versus a reagent blank. The calibration graphs were linear from 0.4 to 3 pg/mL and recovery was 98%. [Pg.182]

A plot of the pKa values of anilines in DMSO versus the pKa values of anilinium ions in water is linear with a slope of 1.8. This allows the extrapolation of 41 1 for the pKa of ammonia in DMSO from that of NH4+ in water (9.27)127. Alternatively, the pKa of ammonia in DMSO has been extrapolated105 from the intersystem correlation between the DMSO acidities of NH2X and PhNHX as a value of 35.8. Extrapolation of the pKa value of ammonia from the Taft-like dual substituent parameter (DSP) of NH2X DMSO acidities gave a similar value of 36.6. [Pg.400]

Cao and Zeng [52] used of an oscillopolarographic method for the determination and the electrochemical behavior of omeprazole. Portions of standard omeprazole solution were treated with 1 ml 1 M ammonia/ ammonium chloride at pH 8.9 and the solution was diluted with water to 10 ml. The diluted solution was subjected to single sweep oscillopolaro-graphy with measurement of the derivative reduction peak at —1.105 V versus saturated calomel electrode. The calibration graph was linear from 0.5 to 10 /iM omeprazole with a detection limit of 0.2 fiM. The method was applied to the analysis of omeprazole in capsules with recoveries of 100-118.6% and RSD of 6.78%. The electrochemical behavior of omeprazole at the mercury electrode was also investigated. [Pg.213]

Figure 4-16. Gas phase proton affinities (PA in kcal mol-1) of B clusters versus /n (B = piperidine, ammonia, methanol, and water) (from Knochenmuss and Leutwyler 1989). The threshold proton affinity corresponds to the energetic limit for which excited state proton transfer occurs for 1-naphthol in small clusters. Figure 4-16. Gas phase proton affinities (PA in kcal mol-1) of B clusters versus /n (B = piperidine, ammonia, methanol, and water) (from Knochenmuss and Leutwyler 1989). The threshold proton affinity corresponds to the energetic limit for which excited state proton transfer occurs for 1-naphthol in small clusters.
Two effects cause the low production capacity of large-grained catalyst. First, large grain size retards transport of the ammonia formed inside the catalyst into the bulk gas stream. This is because the ammonia transport proceeds by slow diffusion through the pore system. The second effect is a consequence of the fact that a single catalyst grain in the oxide state reduces from the outside to the interior of the particle. The water vapor produced inside the catalyst by reduction comes into contact with already reduced catalyst on its way to the outer surface of the catalyst. This induces a severe recrystallization. As an example, if the particle size increases from about 1 to 8 mm, the inner surface decreases from 11 to 16 m2/g to 3 to 8 m2/g74. Therefore the choice of catalyst requires the optimization of 1) catalyst size versus catalyst activity, 2) catalyst size versus pressure drop across the converter and 3) the impact of 1 and 2 on... [Pg.172]

The difference between decision making on the basis of a standard alone and on the basis of a standard plus other information can be described as one aspect of the direct versus the indirect model. In the direct model, action is defined exactly as that needed to secure compliance with the standard, for example, as permit conditions for discharges to water that are calculated to meet an environmental standard in a river. The classic cases here are substances like ammonia or cadmium in rivers and other mandatory standards in various European directives. [Pg.37]

Calorimetric investigations of the adsorption of water, ammonia, methanol and other small polar molecules on the Na forms of synthetic zeolites A, X and Y have demonstrated the heterogeneous nature of the versus relation, which can be explained by the successive interactions of the exchange cations at the various crystallographic positions [14]. [Pg.426]

Figure 15.13. The sediment-water interface, (a) Direction of fluxes expected for dissolved constituents between sediment pore waters and the overlying waters (oceans and lakes), (b) For sediments and pore water, the one-dimensional distribution of concentrations is time and depth dependent. Arrows indicate fluxes at the sediment-water interface depending on the concentration gradient in pore water. The overlying water (ocean or lakes) is assumed to be well mixed, (c) Sulfate, phosphate, and ammonia versus depth in pore waters from Santa Barbara Basin, California. (From Sholkovitz, 1973.)... Figure 15.13. The sediment-water interface, (a) Direction of fluxes expected for dissolved constituents between sediment pore waters and the overlying waters (oceans and lakes), (b) For sediments and pore water, the one-dimensional distribution of concentrations is time and depth dependent. Arrows indicate fluxes at the sediment-water interface depending on the concentration gradient in pore water. The overlying water (ocean or lakes) is assumed to be well mixed, (c) Sulfate, phosphate, and ammonia versus depth in pore waters from Santa Barbara Basin, California. (From Sholkovitz, 1973.)...
Figure 15.14. Interstitial water concentrations of major compounds, alkalinity, and pH versus depth (a) nitrate and phosphate, (b) ammonia and alkalinity, (c) sulfate and sulfide, (d) pH, (e) magnesium(II) and calcium(II), and (f) manganese(II) and iron(II). (From Wersin et al., 1991.)... Figure 15.14. Interstitial water concentrations of major compounds, alkalinity, and pH versus depth (a) nitrate and phosphate, (b) ammonia and alkalinity, (c) sulfate and sulfide, (d) pH, (e) magnesium(II) and calcium(II), and (f) manganese(II) and iron(II). (From Wersin et al., 1991.)...
When the data are plotted versus density, all of the profiles from different locations fall together in a narrow range. The data for dissolved oxygen, sulfide, iron, and manganese are shown in Figure 5, and the data for dissolved nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, and phosphate are shown in Figure 6. Features in the water column occur at different depths at different locations, but they always occur close to the same density surface. The only exceptions appear to occur in the region close to the Bosporus, where the Black Sea inflow interleaves with ambient water. [Pg.165]


See other pages where Ammonia water versus is mentioned: [Pg.3883]    [Pg.559]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.3126]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.753]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.179]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.223 ]




SEARCH



Ammonia Water

© 2024 chempedia.info