Amino acids, properties structures

Within the same individual, different isoforms or isozymes of a protein may be synthesized during different stages of fetal and embryonic development, may be present in different tissues, or may reside in different intracellular locations. Isoforms of a protein all have the same function. If they are isozymes (isoforms of enzymes), they catalyze the same reactions. However, isoforms have somewhat different properties and amino acid structure. 

General Properties of Transaminases. Transaminases appear to require the complete amino acid structure. Peptides have not been found to participate in transaminations. The equilibria of transaminations in general indicate very little standard free-energy change. The one conspicuous exception is the formation of glycine from glyoxylate, which proceeds almost to completion, and is reversed with great difficulty. 

Properties of Amino Acids Structures of Common Amino Acids Properties of Purine and Pyrimidine Bases The Genetic Code Properties of Fatty Acids Carbohydrate Names and Symbols... 

The ambiguity of the C-terminal amino acid structure was resolved by a Hofmann degradation, followed by hydrolysis and amino acid analysis. The absolute configuration of the amino acids were determined from the GC/MS (El and Cl) properties of their N-trifluoroacetyl isopropyl esters (5) on a chiral column. This procedure revealed that the two aspartate residues had different configurations and the ambiguity of position of these two residues in the peptide was resolved by analyzing products of partial acid hydrolysis. The structure of the toxin was determined as (6). 

All these polymers display a poly-a-amino acid structure. Their polyampholytic behavior has been examined from the point of view of their two step dissociation constants, and their complexing properties towards bivalent metal ions. 

A polymer is a macromolecule that is constructed by chemically linking together a sequent of molecular fragments. In simple synthetic polymers such as polyethylene or polystyrer all of the molecular fragments comprise the same basic unit (or monomer). Other poly me contain mixtures of monomers. Proteins, for example, are polypeptide chains in which eac unit is one of the twenty amino acids. Cross-linking between different chains gives rise to j-further variations in the constitution and structure of a polymer. All of these features me affect the overall properties of the molecule, sometimes in a dramatic way. Moreover, or... 

Hydrogen bonding stabilizes some protein molecules in helical forms, and disulfide cross-links stabilize some protein molecules in globular forms. We shall consider helical structures in Sec. 1.11 and shall learn more about ellipsoidal globular proteins in the chapters concerned with the solution properties of polymers, especially Chap. 9. Both secondary and tertiary levels of structure are also influenced by the distribution of polar and nonpolar amino acid molecules relative to the aqueous environment of the protein molecules. Nonpolar amino acids are designated in Table 1.3. 

The dielectric constants of amino acid solutions are very high. Thek ionic dipolar structures confer special vibrational spectra (Raman, k), as well as characteristic properties (specific volumes, specific heats, electrostriction) (34). 

Properties and Structure. a -Acid glycoprotein (a -AGP) has a molecular mass of about 41,000 and consists of a peptide chain having 181 amino acid residues and five carbohydrate units (14,15). Two cystine disulfide cross-linkages connect residues 5 and 147 and residues 72 and 164. The carbohydrate units comprise 45% of the molecule and contain siaUc acid, hexosamine, and neutral hexoses. In phosphate buffer the isoelectric point of the... 

Einally, structural properties that depend directly neither on the data nor on the energy parameters can be checked by comparing the structures to statistics derived from a database of solved protein structures. PROCHECK-NMR and WHAT IE [94] use, e.g., statistics on backbone and side chain dihedral angles and on hydrogen bonds. PROSA [95] uses potentials of mean force derived from distributions of amino acid-amino acid distances. 

There is some confusion in using Bayes rule on what are sometimes called explanatory variables. As an example, we can try to use Bayesian statistics to derive the probabilities of each secondary structure type for each amino acid type, that is p( x r), where J. is a, P, or Y (for coil) secondary strucmres and r is one of the 20 amino acids. It is tempting to writep( x r) = p(r x)p( x)lp(r) using Bayes rule. This expression is, of course, correct and can be used on PDB data to relate these probabilities. But this is not Bayesian statistics, which relate parameters that represent underlying properties with (limited) data that are manifestations of those parameters in some way. In this case, the parameters we are after are 0 i(r) = p( x r). The data from the PDB are in the form of counts for y i(r), the number of amino acids of type r in the PDB that have secondary structure J.. There are 60 such numbers (20 amino acid types X 3 secondary structure types). We then have for each amino acid type a Bayesian expression for the posterior distribution for the values of xiiry. 

A similar formalism is used by Thompson and Goldstein [90] to predict residue accessibilities. What they derive would be a very useful prior distribution based on multiplying out independent probabilities to which data could be added to form a Bayesian posterior distribution. The work of Arnold et al. [87] is also not Bayesian statistics but rather the calculation of conditional distributions based on the simple counting argument that p(G r) = p(a, r)lp(r), where a is some property of interest (secondary structure, accessibility) and r is the amino acid type or some property of the amino acid type (hydro-phobicity) or of an amino acid segment (helical moment, etc). 

Figure 1.2 shows one way of dividing a polypeptide chain, the biochemist s way. There is, however, a different way to divide the main chain into repeating units that is preferable when we want to describe the structural properties of proteins. For this purpose it is more useful to divide the polypeptide chain into peptide units that go from one Ca atom to the next Ca atom (see Figure 1.5). Each C atom, except the first and the last, thus belongs to two such units. The reason for dividing the chain in this way is that all the atoms in such a unit are fixed in a plane with the bond lengths and bond angles very nearly the same in all units in all proteins. Note that the peptide units of the main chain do not involve the different side chains (Figure 1.5). We will use both of these alternative descriptions of polypeptide chains—the biochemical and the structural—and discuss proteins in terms of the sequence of different amino acids and the sequence of planar peptide units.

The side chains of the 20 different amino acids listed in Panel 1.1 (pp. 6-7) have very different chemical properties and are utilized for a wide variety of biological functions. However, their chemical versatility is not unlimited, and for some functions metal atoms are more suitable and more efficient. Electron-transfer reactions are an important example. Fortunately the side chains of histidine, cysteine, aspartic acid, and glutamic acid are excellent metal ligands, and a fairly large number of proteins have recruited metal atoms as intrinsic parts of their structures among the frequently used metals are iron, zinc, magnesium, and calcium. Several metallo proteins are discussed in detail in later chapters and it suffices here to mention briefly a few examples of iron and zinc proteins. 

The 434 Cro molecule contains 71 amino acid residues that show 48% sequence identity to the 69 residues that form the N-terminal DNA-binding domain of 434 repressor. It is not surprising, therefore, that their three-dimensional structures are very similar (Figure 8.11). The main difference lies in two extra amino acids at the N-terminus of the Cro molecule. These are not involved in the function of Cro. By choosing the 434 Cro and repressor molecules for his studies, Harrison eliminated the possibility that any gross structural difference of these two molecules can account for their different DNA-binding properties. 

The specific role of each amino acid residue for the function of the protein can be tested by making specific mutations of the residue in question and examining the properties of the mutant protein. By combining in this way functional studies in solution, site-directed mutagenesis by recombinant DNA techniques, and three-dimensional structure determination, we are now in a position to gain fresh insights into the way protein molecules work. 

---