Alkaline-surfactant flooding recovery mechanisms

A fundamental chemical process is surfactant flooding in which the key mechanism is to reduce interfacial tension (IFT) between oil and the displacing fluid. The mechanism, because of the reduced IFT, is associated with the increased capillary number, which is a dimensionless ratio of viscous-to-local capillary forces. Experimental data show that as the capillary number increases, the residual oil saturation decreases (Lake, 1989). Therefore, as IFT is reduced through the addition of surfactants, the ultimate oil recovery is increased. In alkaline flooding, the surfactant required to reduce IFT is generated in situ by the chemical reaction between injected alkali and naphthenic acids in the... 

One natural core was used to compare the performance of waterflood (W), AP flood, and ASP flood. The recovery factors for W, AP, and ASP were 50%, 69.7%, and 86.4%, respectively. These core flood tests were history matched, and the history-matched model was extended to a real field model including alkaline consumption and chemical adsorption mechanisms. A layered heterogeneous model was set up by taking into account the pilot geological characteristics. The predicted performance is shown in Table 11.3. In the table, Ca, Cs, and Cp denote alkaline, surfactant, and polymer concentrations, respectively. After the designed PV of chemical slug was injected, water was injected until almost no oil was produced. The total injection PV for each case is shown in the table as well. The cost is the chemical cost per barrel of incremental oil produced. An exchange rate of 7 Chinese yuan per U.S. dollar was used. From... 

Alkaline flooding is based on the reaction that occurs between the alkaline water and the organic acids, naturally occurring in some crudes, to produce in-situ surfactants or emulsifying soaps at the oil/water interface. Recent literature (i-J.) summarizes several proposed mechanisms by which alkaline water-flooding will enhance oil recovery. These mechanisms include emulsification and entrapment, emulsification and entrainment, and wettability reversal (oil-wet to water-wet or water-wet to oil-wet). Depending on the initial reservoir and experimental conditions with respect to oil, rock and injection water properties, one or more of these proposed mechanisms may be controlling. 

In the alkaline flood process, the surfactant is generated by the in situ chemical reaction between the alkali of the aqueous phase and the organic acids of the oil phase The surface-active reaction products can adsorb onto the rock surface to alter the wettability of the reservoir rock and/or can adsorb onto the oil-water interface to lower the interfacial tension. At these lowered tensions (1-10 dyne/cm), surface or shear-driven forces promote the formation of stable oil-in-water emulsions or unstable water-in-oil emulsions the nature of the emulsion phase depends on the pH, temperature, and electrolyte type and concentration. These different paths of the surface-active reaction products have created different recovery mechanisms of alkaline flooding. The four alkaline recovery mechanisms which have been cited in the recent literature are (i) Emulsification and Entrainment, (ii) Emulsification and Entrapment, (iii) Wettability Reversal from Oil-to Water-Wet, and (iv) Wettability Reversal from Water- to Oil-Wet. These four mechanisms are similar in that alkaline flooding enhances the recovery of acidic oil by two-stage processes. 

Alkaline Surfactant Polymer (ASP) Flood Need to soften water for alkaline, which requires greater Opex and Capex. Questions over predominant recovery mechanism arise. Is the increased oil production due to conformance by polymer or reduced interfacial tension from the alkaline and surfactant ... 

Increasing the water-wet surface area of a petroleum reservoir is one mechanism by which alkaline floods recover incremental oil(19). Under basic pH conditions, organic acids in acidic crudes produce natural surfactants which can alter the wettability of pore surfaces. Recovery of incremental oil by alkaline flooding is dependent on the pH and salinity of the brine (20), the acidity of the crude and the wettability of the porous medium(1,19,21,22). Thus, alkaline flooding is an oil and reservoir specific recovery process which can not be used in all reservoirs. The usefulness of alkaline flooding is also limited by the large volumes of caustic required to satisfy rock reactions(23). 

The data from these tests show that sodium orthosilicate is more effective than sodium hydroxide in recovering residual oil under the conditions studied, both for continuous flooding and when 0.5 PV of alkali was injected. The mechanisms through which sodium orthosilicate produced better recovery than sodium hydroxide in this system have not been completely elucidated. Reduction in interfacial tension is similar for both chemicals, so other factors must play a more important role. Somasundaran (26) has shown that sodium silicates are more effective than other alkaline chemicals in reducing surfactant adsorption on rock surfaces. Wasan (27,28) has indicated that there are differences in coalescence behavior and emulsion stability which favor sodium orthosilicate over sodium hydroxide. Further work is being done in this area in an attempt to define the limits of physically measurable parameters which can be used for screening potential alkaline flooding candidates. 

---