Adsorptive potential

The condition for a finite contact angle is then that Al/yi < 1, or that the adsorption potential field decay more rapidly than the stnictural perturbation. 

The existence of a characteristic isotherm (or of a r-plot) gives a very important piece of information about the adsorption potential, at least for polar solids for which the observation holds. The direct implication is that film thickness f, or alternatively n/n is determined by P/I independent of the nature of the adsorbent. We can thus write... 

Figure 3.10 is a plot of potential against distance from the wall for a liquid in a capillary of sufficient width for its middle A to be outside the range of forces from the wall. Since the capillary condensate is in equilibrium with the vapour, its chemical potential (=p represented by the horizontal line GF, will be lower than that of the free liquid the difference in chemical potential of the condensate at A, represented by the vertical distance AF, is brought about entirely by the pressure drop, Ap = 2y/r , across the meniscus (cf. Equation (3.6)) but at some point B. say, nearer the wall, the chemical potential receives a contribution represented by the line BC, from the adsorption potential. Consequently, the reduction Ap in pressure across the meniscus must be less at B than at A, so that again... 

The second class of atomic manipulations, the perpendicular processes, involves transfer of an adsorbate atom or molecule from the STM tip to the surface or vice versa. The tip is moved toward the surface until the adsorption potential wells on the tip and the surface coalesce, with the result that the adsorbate, which was previously bound either to the tip or the surface, may now be considered to be bound to both. For successful transfer, one of the adsorbate bonds (either with the tip or with the surface, depending on the desired direction of transfer) must be broken. The fate of the adsorbate depends on the nature of its interaction with the tip and the surface, and the materials of the tip and surface. Directional adatom transfer is possible with the apphcation of suitable junction biases. Also, thermally-activated field evaporation of positive or negative ions over the Schottky barrier formed by lowering the potential energy outside a conductor (either the surface or the tip) by the apphcation of an electric field is possible. FIectromigration, the migration of minority elements (ie, impurities, defects) through the bulk soHd under the influence of current flow, is another process by which an atom may be moved between the surface and the tip of an STM. 

Chemical Potential. Equilibrium calculations are based on the equaHty of individual chemical potentials (and fiigacities) between phases in contact (10). In gas—soHd adsorption, the equiHbrium state can be defined in terms of an adsorption potential, which is an extension of the chemical potential concept to pore-filling (physisorption) onto microporous soHds (11—16). 

FIG. 2 Charge density q z) (solid line) with its integral Q z) = q z )dz (dashed line) in presence of an adsorption potential and, in the case of asymmetrical ions, 0. The decay constants are /ci = 1 + 2/ and 2 = 1 — 2/. (Reprinted from Ref. 19 with permission from Elsevier Science.)... 

Selecting the values of the parameters for the calculations we have in mind a 1 1 aqueous 1 m solution at a room temperature for which the Debye length is 0.3 nm. We assume that the non-local term has the same characteristic length, leading to b=. For the adsorption potential parameter h we select its value so that it has a similar value to the other contributions to the Hamiltonian. To illustrate, a wall potential with h = 1 corresponds to a square well 0.1 nm wide and 3.0 kT high or, conversely, a 3.0 nm wide square well of height 1.0 kT. 

Thus the potential difference at the interface between a metal and electrolyte solution is due to both the charges at the interface (electrostatic potential difference) and the surface dipole layers the latter is referred to as the surface or adsorption potential difference. On the basis of the above considerations it might appear that adsorption at a metal surface with an excess charge is solely due to electrostatic interaction with charged species in the solution, i.e. if the metal surface has an excess negative charge the cations... 

While Eq. (36) is valid for 9 = 1, a qualitatively similar equation is obtained at any value of 9. Since the condition 9 - 1 is difficult to reach experimentally, the value of AEaB0 (adsorption potential shift) is often estimated by means of extrapolation to 9 = 1. This procedure is very delicate and the result is often misleading. The variation of EOm0 with 9 may be linear or nonlinear, depending on lateral interactions between... 

Equation (38) still includes the electronic term. On the other hand, SB(dip) ir may differ from gB(dip) at the metal surface as a consequence of different interactions with the environment. Therefore the interpretation of adsorption potential shifts is always subject to a number of assumptions that cannot be easily checked. 

Figure 8. Typical adsorption potential shifts as a function of adsorbate surface concentration. (1) At the free surface of a solution (real behavior), (2) ideal behavior, and (3) at a metal (Hg)/solution interface. Experimental points for adsorption of 1,4-butanediol from Ref. 328.

More recently, the curvature at air/solution interfaces has been accounted for by Nikitas and Pappa-Louisi98 in terms of a specific molecular model that predicts a linear dependence of (lM/ ) on (1/0). The same model also reproduces the behavior at metal/solution interfaces, specifically Hg electrodes, for which most of the experimental data exist. Nikitas treatment provides a method for an unambiguous extrapolation of the adsorption potential shift to 0= 1. However, the interpretation of the results is subject to the difficulties outlined above. Nikitas approach does provide... 

If we now assume that this surface at temperature T is in equilibrium with a gas then the adsorption rate equals the desorption rate. Since the atoms/molecules are physisorbed in a weak adsorption potential there are no barriers and the sticking coefficient (the probability that a molecule adsorbs) is unity. This is not entirely consistent since there is an entropic barrier to direct adsorption on a specific site from the gas phase. Nevertheless, a lower sticking probability does not change the overall characteristics of the model. Hence, at equilibrium we have... 

Adsorption of a dipolar substance at the w/a and w/o interfaces changes surface tension and modifies the surface potential of water (Fig. 11). As seen in Fig. 11, the change in compensation voltage due to adsorption is the surface potential difference, usually called the surface potential or better the adsorption potential and often indicated unnecessarily by AV. ... 

According to the macroscopic model, the adsorption potential shift is due to the removal of some solvent molecules, s, from the surface region and accommodating there the oriented molecules of adsorbate, B."" Using the assumptions listed in Ref 114, the dependence for A% is of the form... 

The models presented above have also been reviewed in Ref 18. Recently, an expression for the adsorption potential at the free water surface based on a combination of the electrostatic theory of dielectrics and classical thermodynamics has also been proposed." ... 

The popular applications of the adsorption potential measurements are those dealing with the surface potential changes at the water/air and water/hydrocarbon interface when a monolayer film is formed by an adsorbed substance. " " " Phospholipid monolayers, for instance, formed at such interfaces have been extensively used to study the surface properties of the monolayers. These are expected to represent, to some extent, the surface properties of bilayers and biological as well as various artificial membranes. An interest in a number of applications of ordered thin organic films (e.g., Langmuir and Blodgett layers) dominated research on the insoluble monolayer during the past decade. 

Research on the adsorption potentials of aqueous solutions containing various short-chain organic compounds, developed mainly by Kamieliski s school,is still intensively continued by his successors. The investigations also deal with mixed adsorbate sys-terns." " ... 

Our laboratory has investigated adsorption behavior at air/water and Hg/water interfaces, the adsorption potentials caused by the aliphatic nitriles," dinitriles,monoalkyl ethers" dialkylethers" propalgyl alcohol, and dimethysulfoxide. The influence of the relative positions of two OH groups using the isomeric butanodiols has been also studied. ... 

Adsorption potential shifts are higher at the air/solution than at the Hg/solution interface. This aspect has been discussed in terms of nonlocal electronic effects in the metal surface and different molecular orientation atthetwo interfacee. " "... 

XIII. ADSORPTION POTENTIALS OF SURFACE-ACTIVE ELECTROLYTES... 

---