Adsorption potentials sites, change

If we now assume that this surface at temperature T is in equilibrium with a gas then the adsorption rate equals the desorption rate. Since the atoms/molecules are physisorbed in a weak adsorption potential there are no barriers and the sticking coefficient (the probability that a molecule adsorbs) is unity. This is not entirely consistent since there is an entropic barrier to direct adsorption on a specific site from the gas phase. Nevertheless, a lower sticking probability does not change the overall characteristics of the model. Hence, at equilibrium we have... 

In terms of Equations 7 and 8 the change in adsorption behavior at pH 6 and 10"5M Co (II) shown in Figure 4 can be described as being caused by the operation of a specific adsorption potential (+ cal./mole). Since the hydrolysis products are unlikely to contribute a sufficiently large potential to account for the increased adsorption, it must be concluded that above 10"5M at pH 6, and above pH 6.5-7.5 at 10 4M Co (II), the Co2+ ion is specifically adsorbed and located within the Stem plane. It is probable that these conditions correspond to the fact that an activity ratio of Co2+ and surface O" or OH" sites has been exceeded. 

The specific adsorption of halide anions has been studied on Au and Ag single crystals [14]. On Au(l 11), these ions form incommensurate hexagonal monolayers that compress as the electrode potential is changed in the positive direction [19]. However, on Ag(lOO), Br adsorption occurs at the hollow site formed by four metal atoms in a square pattern. This type of commensurate monolayer has a c(2 X 2) surface structure. These studies demonstrate the role of atomic surface structure in determining the extent of adsorption. Differences between adsorption on Ag(lOO) and Au(lOO) are explained in terms of differences in the strengths of the metal-halide bonds [14]. 

Structure of porosity can be further imagined by making use of a two-dimensional maize as in Figure 1.4. This model (with its limitations) illustrates (a) that all positions of adsorption are interconnected and (b) the complexity of porosity in activated carbon when 1 cm of an active carbon contains about 10 of such adsorption spaces (sites). Further, the adsorption potential of an adsorption site changes when a neighboring site is occupied. During an adsorption process, the entire porosity is in a state of constant change. 

Taking displacement reactions as the basis and assuming that the adsorption potential at the site of a dislocation (D), double kink, i.e., a pair of neighboring kinks of opposite sign in a ledge (DK), ledge (L), and surface terrace (T) changes in the sequence D>DK>K>L>T, one finds... 

Thus the entropy of localized adsorption can range widely, depending on whether the site is viewed as equivalent to a strong adsorption bond of negligible entropy or as a potential box plus a weak bond (see Ref. 12). In addition, estimates of AS ds should include possible surface vibrational contributions in the case of mobile adsorption, and all calculations are faced with possible contributions from a loss in rotational entropy on adsorption as well as from change in the adsorbent structure following adsorption (see Section XVI-4B). These uncertainties make it virtually impossible to affirm what the state of an adsorbed film is from entropy measurements alone for this, additional independent information about surface mobility and vibrational surface states is needed. (However, see Ref. 15 for a somewhat more optimistic conclusion.)... 

The state of the surface is now best considered in terms of distribution of site energies, each of the minima of the kind indicated in Fig. 1.7 being regarded as an adsorption site. The distribution function is defined as the number of sites for which the interaction potential lies between and (rpo + d o)> various forms of this function have been proposed from time to time. One might expect the form ofto fio derivable from measurements of the change in the heat of adsorption with the amount adsorbed. In practice the situation is complicated by the interaction of the adsorbed molecules with each other to an extent depending on their mean distance of separation, and also by the fact that the exact proportion of the different crystal faces exposed is usually unknown. It is rarely possible, therefore, to formulate the distribution function for a given solid except very approximately. 

The effects of adsorbed inhibitors on the individual electrode reactions of corrosion may be determined from the effects on the anodic and cathodic polarisation curves of the corroding metaP . A displacement of the polarisation curve without a change in the Tafel slope in the presence of the inhibitor indicates that the adsorbed inhibitor acts by blocking active sites so that reaction cannot occur, rather than by affecting the mechanism of the reaction. An increase in the Tafel slope of the polarisation curve due to the inhibitor indicates that the inhibitor acts by affecting the mechanism of the reaction. However, the determination of the Tafel slope will often require the metal to be polarised under conditions of current density and potential which are far removed from those of normal corrosion. This may result in differences in the adsorption and mechanistic effects of inhibitors at polarised metals compared to naturally corroding metals . Thus the interpretation of the effects of inhibitors at the corrosion potential from applied current-potential polarisation curves, as usually measured, may not be conclusive. This difficulty can be overcome in part by the use of rapid polarisation methods . A better procedure is the determination of true polarisation curves near the corrosion potential by simultaneous measurements of applied current, corrosion rate (equivalent to the true anodic current) and potential. However, this method is rather laborious and has been little used. 

Completely different behavior is observed with S and Se, as shown in Fig. 7.8. With these adatoms, deposition on the terrace starts from the very beginning and no selectivity towards the step is observed. Additionally, deposition of the adatom changes the hydrogen adsorption energy on the (110) step sites, as reflected by the progressive shift of the peak at 0.12 V towards higher potential values. 

---