Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Adsorption constants factors affecting

Environmental pH is the most important factor affecting CP adsorption and mobility (Choi Aomine, 1972, 1974a,b Christodoulatosetal., 1994 Stapleton etal., 1994). Since the dissociation constants (p Ka) of CPs are in the same range as the pH in groundwater, both protonated and deprotonated CPs may exist under natural conditions. Lower chlorinated phenols are more protonated in neutral environments than their polychlorinated congeners. With PCP, for example, the sorption to clay decreases threefold between pH 4 and 8.5 (Stapleton et al., 1994). Low soil pH might also cause CP precipitation, especially from alkaline solution. [Pg.256]

For example, the concept of Kj, (Eq. (4.9)) corresponds to Henry adsorption isotherm (adsorption is proportional to the equilibrium concentration/pressure of the adsorbate), which can be derived from the adsorption reaction 4.1, whose equilibrium constant defined by Eq. (4.2) depends only on the nature of the adsorbent and the adsorbate, but it is independent of the experimental conditions (over certain limited range). It is well known that in principle Kjy is variable, e.g. the effect of the pH on is demonstrated in Figs. 4.28-4.63. These figures show that the pH is an important but not unique factor affecting the distribution of the adsorbate, e.g. the usually decreases when the concentration of the adsorbate increases at constant pH. However, a few cases of constant over a broad range of concentrations of the adsorbate are also reported in Tables 4.1 and 4.2. [Pg.579]

The abilily of activated carbon to remove a broad spectrum of orj nic compounds from wastewater is well documented. The Freundlich single-solute isotherm constants, as tabulated in [32], are reproduced in Table 2. These data illustrate clearly the wide range of organic compounds of different structures, sizes, functionality, etc. that can be adsorbed by an activated carbon. It can also be observed that these compounds exhibit different adsorption characteristics. Indeed, the adsorption behavior is affected by various factors related to molecular structure [33], like the adsorbate solubility, the kind of substituent groups of aromatic compounds, the size of tire molecule, its polarity and its hydrophobicity. [Pg.387]

Other factors affecting the signals in the dynamic mode are adsorption-induced effects, such as surface stress and position dependence, which can either stiffen or soften the cantilever, thereby varying the spring constant. The relationship between the surface stress and stiffness of a cantilever has been intensively discussed [20-22]. Lee et al. visually demonstrated the dependence of resonance frequency on a pattern of a gold layer on the surface of a cantilever [23]. In any case, we have to be careful about these effects when we analyze the signals obtained with the dynamic mode. [Pg.180]

The rate of chemical hydrolysis is highly dependent upon the compound s solubility, temperature and pH. Since other environmental factors such as photolysis, adsorption, volatility (i.e., Hemy s law constants) and adsorption can affect the rate of hydrolysis, these factors are virtually eliminated by... [Pg.21]

Contaminant volatilization from subsurface solid and aqueous phases may lead, on the one hand, to pollution of the atmosphere and, on the other hand, to contamination (by vapor transport) of the vadose zone and groundwater. Potential volatihty of a contaminant is related to its inherent vapor pressure, but actual vaporization rates depend on the environmental conditions and other factors that control behavior of chemicals at the solid-gas-water interface. For surface deposits, the actual rate of loss, or the pro-portionahty constant relating vapor pressure to volatilization rates, depends on external conditions (such as turbulence, surface roughness, and wind speed) that affect movement away from the evaporating surface. Close to the evaporating surface, there is relatively little movement of air and the vaporized substance is transported from the surface through the stagnant air layer only by molecular diffusion. The rate of contaminant volatilization from the subsurface is a function of the equilibrium distribution between the gas, water, and solid phases, as related to vapor pressure solubility and adsorption, as well as of the rate of contaminant movement to the soil surface. [Pg.153]

Elemental growth spiral layers originating from an isolated dislocation can advance, keeping the step separation constant, unless factors which affect the advancing rate of the spiral steps, such as a local fluctuation in driving force or impurity adsorption, takes place. The step separation of a spiral, A, is related to the critical radius of two-dimensional nuclei, r, in the following manner (see ref. [11], Chapter 3) ... [Pg.100]

Another important factor which can significantly affect the shape and position of the voltammetric wave, and hence rate constants, is adsorption of product or reactant on the electrode surface. For a linear adsorption isotherm, if the reactant is adsorbed, a reduction wave will be shifted towards more negative potentials and if the product is adsorbed, towards more positive potentials [160], Non-linear adsorption isotherms give rise to pre-waves (product adsorption) and post-waves (reactant adsorption), a phenomenon which was first discussed by Brdidka at the DME and since then by many authors [161, 162]. At the RDE,... [Pg.405]

The values of the rate constants are given in Table 3. Since methanol adsorbs dissociatively only on the Pt atoms present on the alloy surface the difference in the adsorption rates indicates that surface properties of platinum became modified by mthenium. Thus the significant difference in methanol adsorption rates on Pt and Pt/Ru is a clear manifestation of the electronic effect, that is either activation energy for adsorption, and/or the pre-exponential factor became affected by the mthenium modification. [Pg.447]

E vs. Aa seems to be most sensitive to product concentrations near the external surface of the catalyst and adsorption/desorption equilibrium constants. I c.surf. I d, surf, and 6>, directly affect the vacant-site fraction on the interior catalytic surface and the rate of reactant consumption. In the previous simulations, product molar densities near the external surface of the catalyst were varied by a factor of 50 (i.e., from 0.1 to 5), and 0, was varied by a factor of 20 (i.e., from 0.05 to 1). The effectiveness factor increases significantly when either 4 c,surf, I d. surf or 6i is larger. E vs. Aa is marginally sensitive to a stoichiometric imbalance between reactants A2 and B, but I B.sur ce was only varied by a factor of 4 (i.e., from 0.5 to 2). A four-fold decrease in the molecular weight of reactant B, which produces two-fold changes in 30b, effective and 5b, does not affect E. [Pg.505]


See other pages where Adsorption constants factors affecting is mentioned: [Pg.453]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.635]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.829]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.945]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.992]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.3785]    [Pg.3803]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.114]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.370 ]




SEARCH



Adsorption factors affecting

© 2024 chempedia.info