Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Adsorption average

Brunauer (see Refs. 136-138) defended these defects as deliberate approximations needed to obtain a practical two-constant equation. The assumption of a constant heat of adsorption in the first layer represents a balance between the effects of surface heterogeneity and of lateral interaction, and the assumption of a constant instead of a decreasing heat of adsorption for the succeeding layers balances the overestimate of the entropy of adsorption. These comments do help to explain why the model works as well as it does. However, since these approximations are inherent in the treatment, one can see why the BET model does not lend itself readily to any detailed insight into the real physical nature of multilayers. In summary, the BET equation will undoubtedly maintain its usefulness in surface area determinations, and it does provide some physical information about the nature of the adsorbed film, but only at the level of approximation inherent in the model. Mainly, the c value provides an estimate of the first layer heat of adsorption, averaged over the region of fit. [Pg.653]

The ability to obtain isotherms on individual groups also enable the calculation of the isosteric heat of adsorbtion on that site (as distinct from the heats of adsorption averaged over the whole surface which are normally obtained from adsorption isotherms). Relationships between the OH frequency shifts and heats of adsorbtion have been obtained this way (18). A relationship between the frequency shift and the ionisation potential of the adsorbing molecules has been demonstrated by several authors (20-22) and a theoretical explanation based on the Mullikan-Puranik approach to H-bonding has been given by Low and Cusamano (23). [Pg.8]

The term dq/dt in Eq. 6.58 is the rate of adsorption averaged over the particle. For a spherical particle it is given by dq/dt = 3/(RpMf) where Mp is the mass flux of solute from the bulk solution to the external surface of the particle. [Pg.302]

Synthesis methodology, structure, specific surface area, BJH adsorption cumulative pore volume (between 17 and 3000 A pore width), t-plot micropore volume and area, and BJH adsorption average pore diameter of tungsten- and molybdenum-based bulk and supported catalysts... [Pg.88]

Tomanova, Zbuzek, Jerakek and Schneider (7) compared mercury and nitrogen adsorption pore size distributions, calculated from the Broekhoff and de Boer equations (14), obtained from a series of controlled pore glasses (CPG). There was always an overestimation of the average pore size irrespective of the cylindrical model used or the branch of the low temperature isotherm (adsorption or desorption) chosen. Nor did the isotherm comport to a slit-shaped pore model. All the adsorption average... [Pg.48]

Fig. XVII-27. Nitrogen adsorption at 77 K for a series of M41S materials. Average pore diameters squares, 25 A triangles, 40 A circles, 45 A. Adsorption solid symbols desorption open symbols. The isotherms are normalized to the volume adsorbed at Pj = 0.9. (From Ref. 187. Reprinted with kind permission from Elsevier Science-NL, Sara Burgerhartstraat 25, 1055 KV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.)... Fig. XVII-27. Nitrogen adsorption at 77 K for a series of M41S materials. Average pore diameters squares, 25 A triangles, 40 A circles, 45 A. Adsorption solid symbols desorption open symbols. The isotherms are normalized to the volume adsorbed at Pj = 0.9. (From Ref. 187. Reprinted with kind permission from Elsevier Science-NL, Sara Burgerhartstraat 25, 1055 KV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.)...
During Stages II and III the average concentration of radicals within the particle determines the rate of polymerization. To solve for n, the fate of a given radical was balanced across the possible adsorption, desorption, and termination events. Initially a solution was provided for three physically limiting cases. Subsequentiy, n was solved for expHcitiy without limitation using a generating function to solve the Smith-Ewart recursion formula (29). This analysis for the case of very slow rates of radical desorption was improved on (30), and later radical readsorption was accounted for and the Smith-Ewart recursion formula solved via the method of continuous fractions (31). [Pg.24]

Deterrnination of the specific surface area can be made by a variety of adsorption measurements or by air-permeability deterrninations. It is customary to calculate average particle size from the values of specific surface by making assumptions regarding particle size distribution and particle shape, ie, assume it is spherical. [Pg.181]

Characterization. When siHca gel is used as an adsorbent, the pore stmcture determines the gel adsorption capacity. Pores are characterized by specific surface area, specific pore volume (total volume of pores per gram of solid), average pore diameter, pore size distribution, and the degree to which entrance to larger pores is restricted by smaller pores. These parameters are derived from measuring vapor adsorption isotherms, mercury intmsion, low angle x-ray scattering, electron microscopy, gas permeabiHty, ion or molecule exclusion, or the volume of imbibed Hquid (1). [Pg.491]

Surface Area. Overall catalyst surface area can be determined by the BET method mentioned eadier, but mote specific techniques are requited to determine a catalyst s active surface area. X-ray diffraction techniques can give data from which the average particle si2e and hence the active surface area may be calculated. Or, it may be necessary to find an appropriate gas or Hquid that will adsorb only on the active surface and to measure the extent of adsorption under controUed conditions. In some cases, it maybe possible to measure the products of reaction between a reactive adsorbent and the active site. Radioactively tagged materials are frequentiy usehil in this appHcation. Once a correlation has been estabHshed between either total or active surface area and catalyst performance (particulady activity), it may be possible to use the less costiy method for quaHty assurance purposes. [Pg.196]

Hexachloroethane is considered to be one of the more toxic chlorinated hydrocarbons. The 1991 ACGIH recommended time-weighted average (TWA) for hexachloroethane was 1 ppm or 10 mg /m of air. Skin adsorption is a route of possible exposure ha2ard. The primary effect of hexachloroethane is depression of the central nervous system (147). Pentachloroethane and tetrachloroethylene are primary metaboHtes of hexachloroethane in sheep (148). [Pg.15]

Air pollution problems in which adsorption is considered a unit operation involve gaseous contaminants. The number of molecules present at the carbon surface is dependent on the number that reach the surface and on the residence time of these molecules on the carbon surface. If n molecules strike a unit area of a surface per unit time, and remain there for an average time, t, then a number of molecules are present per unit area of surface ... [Pg.285]


See other pages where Adsorption average is mentioned: [Pg.220]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.656]    [Pg.658]    [Pg.670]    [Pg.712]    [Pg.1781]    [Pg.2222]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.1540]    [Pg.1542]    [Pg.1544]    [Pg.1549]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.246]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.301 ]




SEARCH



Adsorption average heat

Average adsorption energies

Average heat of adsorption

© 2024 chempedia.info