Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Adjustments conclusion

Overview Reconciliation adjusts the measurements to close constraints subject to their uncertainty. The numerical methods for reconciliation are based on the restriction that the measurements are only subject to random errors. Since all measurements have some unknown bias, this restriction is violated. The resultant adjusted measurements propagate these biases. Since troubleshooting, model development, ana parameter estimation will ultimately be based on these adjusted measurements, the biases will be incorporated into the conclusions, models, and parameter estimates. This potentially leads to errors in operation, control, and design. [Pg.2571]

However, other bias errors are so substantial that their presence will significantly distort any conclusions drawn from the adjusted measurements. Rectification is the detection of the presence of significant bias in a set of measurements, the isolation of the specific measurements containing bias, and the removal of those measurements from subsequent reconcihation and interpretation. Significant bias in measurements is defined as gross error in the literature. [Pg.2571]

The recent studies with the skeletal muscle channels reconstituted in bilayers also established that an intrinsic property of the skeletal muscle Ca channels is that they possess a very low probability of opening. Even under optimal conditions of voltage, etc., these channels open only 8% of the time [95]. This previously unappreciated characteristic of these channels provides an alternative explanation to an earlier study in which it was proposed that only 5% of the DHP receptors in skeletal muscle can form functional channels [91]. In that study a probability of opening of 1.0 was assumed. However, if one adjusts this to 0.08, then the very different conclusion is that all the DHP receptors can make functional channels, but that they open only a very small percentage of the time. [Pg.326]

In conclusion, it should be apparent from this discussion of the absorption mechanisms that, although the major features influencing drug absorption are well known, implementation of a coherent delivery strategy is highly specific for any compound, and many variables need to be adjusted for their significant influence on absorption and more importantly, on bioavailability. In addition, from the suggestion of the role of... [Pg.448]

The variation of DP with initial monomer concentration in n-pentane solution at -78° was studied in a series of experiments [54] in which the catalyst concentration was so adjusted that the conversion was always below 10 per cent. Flowever, these results and similar ones obtained with the same system presented in a later paper [56] are so scattered that no detailed correlation can be deduced. The only possible firm conclusion is that with increasing monomer concentration the DP declines from a peak of about 1.6 x 104 at [i-C4H8] 1 mole/l to about 2.5 x 103 for the polymerisation of the undiluted monomer. [Pg.66]

These features are important if the sponsor intends to use the results to support a conclusion that no dosage adjustment is required for patients with impaired hepatic fxmction. Pharmacodynamic assessments may be useful in studies designed to assess the effect of altered liver fxmction, especially if concentration-response data are not available or if there is a concern that an altered hepatic function could alter the PD response. [Pg.358]

In conclusion, the repulsive interactions arise from both a screened coulomb repulsion between nuclei, and from the overlap of closed inner shells. The former interaction can be effectively described by a bare coulomb repulsion multiplied by a screening function. The Moliere function, Eq. (5), with an adjustable screening length provides an adequate representation for most situations. The latter interaction is well described by an exponential decay of the form of a Bom-Mayer function. Furthermore, due to the spherical nature of the closed atomic orbitals and the coulomb interaction, the repulsive forces can often be well described by pair-additive potentials. Both interactions may be combined either by using functions which reduce to each interaction in the correct limits, or by splining the two forms at an appropriate interatomic distance . [Pg.288]

To adjust (normalize) the data for biases that may have arisen during the technical process thereby ensuring that meaningful biological comparisons and conclusions can be made... [Pg.397]


See other pages where Adjustments conclusion is mentioned: [Pg.51]    [Pg.2564]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.592]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.890]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.218]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.103 ]




SEARCH



Conclusion

© 2024 chempedia.info