Vibrationally adiabatic approximation

Energy Close to IRC Vibrational Adiabatic Approximation Vibrational Non-Adiabatic Model... 

The obtained PES forms the basis for the subsequent dynamical calculation, which starts with determining the MEP. The next step is to use the vibrationally adiabatic approximation for those PES degrees of freedom whose typical frequencies a>j are greater than a>o and a>. Namely, for the high-frequency modes the vibrationally adiabatic potential [Miller 1983] is introduced,... 

In order to study the deviations from the vibrationally adiabatic approximation Benderskii et al. [1992b] have considered the situation when the transverse frequency co, switches instantaneously between two values, coi and CO2 (coi > CO2). If Ti and t2 = P the times of occurrence of the... 

Naturally, neither of these approximations is valid near the border between the two regions. Physically sensible are only such parameters, for which b < 1. Note that even for a low vibration frequency Q, the adiabatic limit may hold for large enough coupling parameter C (see the bill of the adiabatic approximation domain in fig. 30). This situation is referred to as strong-fiuctuation limit by [Benderskii et al. 1991a-c], and it actually takes place for heavy particle transfer, as described in the experimental section of this review. In the section 5 we shall describe how both the sudden and adiabatic limits may be viewed from a unique perspective. 

The adiabatic approximation in the form (5.17) or (5.19) allows one to eliminate the high-frequency modes and to concentrate only on the low-frequency motion. The most frequent particular case of adiabatic approximation is the vibrationally adiabatic potential... 

Jaquet and Miller [1985] have studied the transfer of hydrogen atom between neighbouring equilibrium positions on the (100) face of W by using a model two-dimensional chemosorption PES [McGreery and Wolken 1975]. In that calculation, performed for fairly high temperatures (T> rj the flux-flux formalism along with the vibrationally adiabatic approximation (section 3.6) were used. It has been noted that the increase of the coupling to the lattice vibrations and decrease of the frequency of the latter increase the transition probability. 

In the Bom-Oppenheimer picture the nuclei move on a potential energy surface (PES) which is a solution to the electronic Schrodinger equation. The PES is independent of the nuclear masses (i.e. it is the same for isotopic molecules), this is not the case when working in the adiabatic approximation since the diagonal correction (and mass polarization) depends on the nuclear masses. Solution of (3.16) for the nuclear wave function leads to energy levels for molecular vibrations (Section 13.1) and rotations, which in turn are the fundamentals for many forms of spectroscopy, such as IR, Raman, microwave etc. 

Each of the approaches is based on the premise that it makes sense to focus on the Born Oppenheimer potential for the OH stretch for fixed bath variables. Such a potential has vibrational eigenvalues, and for example h times the transition frequency of the fundamental is simply the difference between the first excited and ground state eigenvalues. Thus in essence this is an adiabatic approximation the assumption is that the vibrational chromophore is sufficiently fast compared to the bath coordinates. To the extent that the h times frequency of the chromophore is large compared to kT, and those of the bath are small compared to kT, this separation of time scales exists and so this should be a reasonable approximation. For water, as discussed earlier, some of the bath variables (librations) have frequencies somewhat larger than kT/h, and... 

The important fact that must be remembered is that in the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, Equation 2.8, the potential energy for vibrational motion is Eeiec(S) which is independent of isotopic mass of the atoms. In the adiabatic approximation, the potential energy function is Eeiec(S)+C and this potential will depend on nuclear mass if C depends on nuclear mass. 

In the spirit of the adiabatic approximation, the transitions between two vibrational states (belonging to initial and final electronic states) must occur so rapidly that there is no change in the configurational coordinate Q. This is known as the Frank Condon principle and it implies that the transitions between i and / states can be represented by vertical arrows, as shown in Figure 5.12. Let us now assume our system to be at absolute zero temperature (0 K), so that only the phonon level = 0 is populated and all the absorption transitions depart from this phonon ground level to different phonon levels m = 0, 1, 2,... of the excited state. Taking into account Equation (5.25), the absorption probability from the = 0 state to an m state varies as follows ... 

In Table II we also compare our total variational energies with the energies obtained by Wolniewicz. In his calculations Wolniewicz employed an approach wherein the zeroth order the adiabatic approximation for the wave function was used (i.e., the wave function is a product of the ground-state electronic wave function and a vibrational wave function) and he calculated the nonadiabatic effects as corrections [107, 108]. In general the agreement between our results... 

The coupling of electronic and vibrational motions is studied by two canonical transformations, namely, normal coordinate transformation and momentum transformation on molecular Hamiltonian. It is shown that by these transformations we can pass from crude approximation to adiabatic approximation and then to non-adiahatic (diabatic) Hamiltonian. This leads to renormalized fermions and renotmahzed diabatic phonons. Simple calculations on H2, HD, and D2 systems are performed and compared with previous approaches. Finally, the problem of reducing diabatic Hamiltonian to adiabatic and crude adiabatic is discussed in the broader context of electronic quasi-degeneracy. 

The term H e is the electron correlation operator, the term H p corresponds to phonon-phonon interaction and H l corresponds to electron-phonon interaction. If we analyze the last term H l we see that when using crude approximation this corresponds to such phonons that force constant in eq. (17) is given as a second derivative of electron-nuclei interaction with respect to normal coordinates. Because we used crude adiabatic approximation in which minimum of the energy is at the point Rg, this is also reflected by basis set used. Therefore this approximation does not properly describes the physical vibrations i.e. if we move the nuclei, electrons are distributed according to the minimum of energy at point Rg and they do not feel correspondingly the R dependence. The perturbation term H) which corresponds to electron-phonon interaction is too large... 

Further we can proceed similarly as in the case of adiabatic approximation. We shall not present here the details, these are presented in [21,22]. We just mention the most important features of our transformation (46-50). Firstly, when passing from crude adiabatic to adiabatic approximation the force constant changed from second derivative of electron-nuclei interaction ufcF to second derivative of Hartree-Fock energy Therefore when performing transformation (46-50) we expect change offeree constant and therefore change of the vibrational part of Hamiltonian... 

Here, we review an adiabatic approximation for the statistical mechanics of a stiff quantum mechanical system, in which vibrations of the hard coordinates are first treated quantum mechanically, while treating the more slowly evolving soft coordinates and momenta for this purpose as parameters, and in which the constrained free energy obtained by summing over vibrational quantum states is then used as a potential energy in a classical treatment of the soft coordinates and momenta. 

The soft coordinates and momenta may be treated as constants for the purpose of describing the rapid vibrations of the hard coordinates. This is the adiabatic approximation. 

Within the old adiabatic approximation, Eq. (39) is the basic starting point. However, from here on, the various approximations diverge. For ease of discussion, we shall first still make the Condon approximation, and then give the further approximations. However, it must be kept in mind that many similar approximations are also made in papers that use a non-Condon approach. The basic premise of the Condon approximation is that the electronic part of the matrix element varies sufficiently slowly with Q so that it can be taken out of the integration over dQ. The matrix element then reduces to products of electronic and vibrational integrals. In Dirac notation... 

The instantaneous OH frequency was calculated at each time step in an adiabatic approximation (fast quantal vibration in a slow classical bath ). We applied second-order perturbation theory, in which the instantaneous solvent-induced frequency shift from the gas-phase value is obtained from the solute-solvent forces and their derivatives acting on a rigid OH bond. This method is both numerically advantageous and allows exploration of sources of various solvent contributions to the frequency shift. 

Here, the pt are the permanent dipoles of molecules i = 1 and 2, and the ptj( r, i 2, Rij) are the dipoles induced by molecule i in molecule j the are the vectors pointing from the center of molecule i to the center of molecule j and the r, are the (intramolecular) vibrational coordinates. In general, these dipoles are given in the adiabatic approximation where electronic and nuclear wavefunctions appear as factors of the total wavefunction, 0(rf r) ( ). Dipole operators pop are defined as usual so that their expectation values shown above can be computed from the wavefunctions. For the induced dipole component, the dipole operator is defined with respect to the center of mass of the pair so that the induced dipole moments py do not depend on the center of mass coordinates. For bigger systems the total dipole moment may be expressed in the form of a simple generalization of Eq. 4.4. In general, the molecules will be assumed to be in a electronic ground state which is chemically inert. 

The motion of the electrons is treated in the adiabatic approximation. For absorption in the infrared, the electrons remain in the ground state. The electric dipole moment of the complex of two molecules is the expectation value of the dipole moment operator over the ground electronic state, which is a function of the nuclear coordinates only. Specifically, the dipole moment of a complex of n molecules is dependent on the vibrational (r,) and orientational ( ,) coordinates, and on the position (J ,-) of the mass centers of the molecules i, for 1 < i < n,... 

The harmonic approximation is typically a good approximation for low vibrational levels. The adiabatic approximation is often valid for high vibrational levels and even energies in the continuum above the dissociation limit. Both harmonic and adiabatic approximations are expected to fail when the separation between electronic energy curves is small compared to differences between vibrational levels. 

Since the inner direct product of eq. (11-3) is the only one which contains the totally symmetric representation Als, only the 1B2u and 3Blu curves will mix within the harmonic approximation. In the adiabatic approximation, however, certain vibrational motions may destroy the point group symmetry and allow the 1BZu state to mix with the 3B2u and 3Elu states. 

---