Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Acid strength model

The parameters and Ca are associated with the Lewis acid, and Eg and Cb with the base. a and b are interpreted as measures of electrostatic interaction, and Ca and Cb as measures of covalent interaction. Drago has criticized the DN approach as being based upon a single model process, and this objection applies also to the — A/y fBFs) model. Drago s criticism is correct, yet we should be careful not to reject a simple concept provided its limits are appreciated. Indeed, many very useful chemical quantities are subject to this criticism for example, p o values are measures of acid strength with reference to the base water. [Pg.426]

Many years ago, geochemists recognized that whereas some metallic elements are found as sulfides in the Earth s crust, others are usually encountered as oxides, chlorides, or carbonates. Copper, lead, and mercury are most often found as sulfide ores Na and K are found as their chloride salts Mg and Ca exist as carbonates and Al, Ti, and Fe are all found as oxides. Today chemists understand the causes of this differentiation among metal compounds. The underlying principle is how tightly an atom binds its valence electrons. The strength with which an atom holds its valence electrons also determines the ability of that atom to act as a Lewis base, so we can use the Lewis acid-base model to describe many affinities that exist among elements. This notion not only explains the natural distribution of minerals, but also can be used to predict patterns of chemical reactivity. [Pg.1505]

We have explored rare earth oxide-modified amorphous silica-aluminas as "permanent" intermediate strength acids used as supports for bifunctional catalysts. The addition of well dispersed weakly basic rare earth oxides "titrates" the stronger acid sites of amorphous silica-alumina and lowers the acid strength to the level shown by halided aluminas. Physical and chemical probes, as well as model olefin and paraffin isomerization reactions show that acid strength can be adjusted close to that of chlorided and fluorided aluminas. Metal activity is inhibited relative to halided alumina catalysts, which limits the direct metal-catalyzed dehydrocyclization reactions during paraffin reforming but does not interfere with hydroisomerization reactions. [Pg.563]

To form the process model, regression analysis was carried out. The alkylate yield x4 was a function of the olefin feed xx and the external isobutane-to-olefin ratio jc8. The relationship determined by nonlinear regression holding the reactor temperatures between 80-90°F and the reactor acid strength by weight percent at 85-93 was... [Pg.492]

Next, a quantitative model, referred to as the E and C equation, is presented for predicting and correlating the enthalpies of adduct formation. The use of this equation and the interpretation of the parameters which result is discussed. Exceptions to the correlation are considered and the valuable insight about intermolecular interactions that can be gained by firmly establishing these exceptions is demonstrated. The parameters we obtain and valid transformations of these parameters are considered in the light of both the HSAB model and Donor Strength model of acid-base chemistry. Both of these concepts are shown to be at best incomplete models of coordination. The relationship between our parameters and the a—q Hammett parameters is quantitatively demonstrated. [Pg.74]

The success of this modeling can be ascertained by the ability to replicate the observed peak shapes using Gaussian peaks centered at peak positions suggested by the modeling (Fig. 3). For the case where n = 3/2, five peaks were needed 1 for the monomeric A1 and 2 peaks each for each of the two dinuclear A1 species. These peaks were combined to successfully replicate the observed NMR peaks recorded for this sample. When n = 2, the data were reproduced using only 4 peaks, two each for each of the two dinuclear A1 species. Our earlier predictions (11) showed that HCl could combine with either of the dinuclear Al-species in three different positions, which showed different acid strengths. [Pg.273]

As with the summaries of the other sections, we mention a number of calculation parameters or variables that have been demonstrated to be of critical importance for accurate prediction of aspects of the interactions. Symmetry constraints on the clusters have been shown to introduce arti-factual behavior. Corrections to account for the correlation of electrons have become essential in a calculation, and they must be incorporated self-consistently rather than as postoptimization corrections. Basis sets need to have the flexibility afforded by double- or triple-zeta functionality and polarization functions to reproduce known parameters most accurately. The choice of the model cluster and its size affect the acid strength, and the cluster must be large enough not to spatially constrain reactants or transition states. The choice of cluster is invariably governed by the available resources, but a small cluster can still perform well. Indeed, some of the... [Pg.106]

New instrumental studies and molecular modeling lent further support to earlier observations. In conclusion, pore topology, acid strength, acid site density, and the location of acid sites are the main factors controlling catalyst performance.324 325 341 343... [Pg.197]

The several attempts, published in the literature, to describe the kinetics of vapour phase olefin (mostly ethylene) hydration can be classified into two groups according to the basic model used. One model, for reactions catalysed by phosphoric acid supported on solids, treats the kinetics as if the process were homogeneous acid catalysis and takes into account the acid strength of the supported acid. Thus, a semiempirical equation for the initial reaction rate [288]... [Pg.324]

Rates of model reactions are more commonly used to determine relative rather than absolute surface acidities and a variety of acid-catalyzed reactions have been used for this purpose (1-3). Xylene isomerization is a particularly well-substantiated model reaction, thanks to work by Ward and Hansford (43). They demonstrated that the conversion of o-xylene to p- and /n-xylenes over a series of synthetic silica-alumina catalysts increases as the alumina content is increased from 1 to 7%. The number of strong Brdnsted acids in each member of the catalyst series was measured by means of infrared spectroscopy. Since conversion of o-xylene was found to be a straight-line function of the number of Br0nsted acids (see Fig. 9), rate of xylene isomerization appears to be a valid index of the amount of surface acidity for this catalyst series. This correlation also indicates that the acid strengths of these silica-alumina preparations are roughly equivalent. [Pg.113]

An apparently straightforward method for the determination of number and strength of acid sites consists of the determination of the amount of base required to poison catalytic activity for a model reaction. By means of plots of activity versus amount of added base, the number of acid sites is obtained from the threshold amount of base required to remove catalytic activity acid strength is gauged from the slope of the titration curve. This method can therefore be called a catalytic titration. [Pg.114]

Zeolite polarity and reaction rate The competition between sulfolane, PA and product molecules for the adsorption on the active protonic sites is sufficient enough to explain the differences in reaction orders and catalyst stability and selectivity between PA transformation in sulfolane and in dodecane. However, the competition for the occupancy of the zeolite micropores plays a significant role as well. This was demonstrated by studying a related reaction the transformation of an equimolar mixture of PA with phenol in sulfolane solvent on a series of H-BEA samples with different framework Si/Al ratios (from 15 to 90).[49] According to the largely accepted next nearest neighbour model,[50,51] the protonic sites of these zeolites should not differ by their acid strength, as furthermore confirmed by the... [Pg.55]

The initial rate of 2-MN acetylation depends on the framework Si/Al ratio of the zeolite catalyst.[27] For a series of dealuminated BEA samples (by treatment with hydrochloric acid or with ammonium hexafluorosilicate), the acetylation rate passes through a maximum for a number of framework A1 atoms per unit cell (/VA() between 1.5 and 2.0 (Si/Al ratio between 30 and 40). The activity of the protonic sites (i.e. the TOF) increases significantly with Si/Al from 420 h 1 for Si/Al = 15 to 2650 h 1 for Si/Al = 90. It should be noted that similar TOF values could be expected from the next nearest neighbour (NNN) model. Indeed all the framework A1 atoms of the zeolite (hence all the corresponding protonic acid sites) are isolated for Si/Al ratio 10.5. Therefore the acid strength of the protonic sites is then maximal as well as their activity.[57,58] This was furthermore found for m-xylcnc isomerization over the same series of BEA zeolites.1271 This increase in TOF for... [Pg.79]

In their surface model, Zecchina et al. (145,146) propose the presence of five distinct types of Cr3 + ions which differ in the coordination number (4 or 5) and in the nature of their ligands. Nevertheless, only one set of infrared bands for the PyL species could be observed. This indicates that the differences in the acid strength of the different Cr3+ ions are small and/or that the vibrational modes of the coordinated pyridine do not respond sensitively enough to the intrinsic acid strength distribution. [Pg.226]

For the complex acids Van Arkel and Carriere have drawn a number of conclusions from their model arguments regarding the order in acid strength of corresponding acids. [Pg.81]

Let us now consider how the limitations imposed by the size of these clusters may influence the results for the chemical reaction step. In spite of the fact that only one type of acid site can be modeled by the 3T and 5T clusters, it must be remembered that the difference in acidic strength of the different sites is much smaller than the activation energy of most reactions. Thus, in the absence of other effects, the fact that the clusters used cannot distinguish different... [Pg.57]


See other pages where Acid strength model is mentioned: [Pg.43]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.553]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.732]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.858]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.62]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.6 , Pg.7 ]




SEARCH



ACID model

Acid strength

Acidizing strength

Acids, acid strength

Model strengths

© 2024 chempedia.info