Acetylene complexes bonding

The hydroboration of enynes yields either of 1,4-addition and 1,2-addition products, the ratio of which dramatically changes with the phosphine ligand as well as the molar ratio of the ligand to the palladium (Scheme 1-8) [46-51]. ( )-l,3-Dienyl-boronate (24) is selectively obtained in the presence of a chelating bisphosphine such as dppf and dppe. On the other hand, a combination of Pdjldba), with Ph2PC6p5 (1-2 equiv. per palladium) yields allenylboronate (23) as the major product. Thus, a double coordination of two C-C unsaturated bonds of enyne to a coordinate unsaturated catalyst affords 1,4-addition product On the other hand, a monocoordination of an acetylenic triple bond to a rhodium(I)/bisphosphine complex leads to 24. Thus, asymmetric hydroboration of l-buten-3-yne giving (R)-allenyl-boronate with 61% ee is carried out by using a chiral monophosphine (S)-(-)-MeO-MOP (MeO-MOP=2-diphenylphosphino-2 -methoxy-l,l -binaphthyl) [52]. 

In summary, the detailed electronic character of dihapto metal-acetylene complexes depends strongly on the Lewis-acceptor capacity of the metal. Formal two-versus four-electron rp ligation to a transition metal can lead to breaking of one or both 7T bonds, dramatically altering the structure and reactivity of the alkynyl... 

Metal-catalyzed C-H bond formation through isomerization, especially asymmetric variant of that, is highly useful in organic synthesis. The most successful example is no doubt the enantioselective isomerization of allylamines catalyzed by Rh(i)/TolBINAP complex, which was applied to the industrial synthesis of (—)-menthol. A highly enantioselective isomerization of allylic alcohols was also developed using Rh(l)/phosphaferrocene complex. Despite these successful examples, an enantioselective isomerization of unfunctionalized alkenes and metal-catalyzed isomerization of acetylenic triple bonds has not been extensively studied. Future developments of new catalysts and ligands for these reactions will enhance the synthetic utility of the metal-catalyzed isomerization reaction. 

This observation may well explain the considerable difference between metal-olefin and metal-acetylene chemistry observed for the trinuclear metal carbonyl compounds of this group. As with iron, ruthenium and osmium have an extensive and rich chemistry, with acetylenic complexes involving in many instances polymerization reactions, and, as noted above for both ruthenium and osmium trinuclear carbonyl derivatives, olefin addition normally occurs with interaction at one olefin center. The main metal-ligand framework is often the same for both acetylene and olefin adducts, and differs in that, for the olefin complexes, two metal-hydrogen bonds are formed by transfer of hydrogen from the olefin. The steric requirements of these two edgebridging hydrogen atoms appear to be considerable and may reduce the tendency for the addition of the second olefin molecule to the metal cluster unit and hence restrict the equivalent chemistry to that observed for the acetylene derivatives. 

Similar reactions applied to transition metal-acetylene complexes appear capable of separating the 2 carbon atoms originally linked by the acetylenic triple bond 18). Thermal isomerization of metal-acetylene complexes may achieve the same result, showing how metal clusters can catalyze scrambling reactions of acetylenes, e.g.. 

This review deals with metal-hydrocarbon complexes under the following headings (1) the nature of the metal-olefin and -acetylene bond (2) olefin complexes (3) acetylene complexes (4) rr-allylic complexes and (5) complexes in which the ligand is not the original olefin or acetylene, but a molecule produced from it during complex formation. ir-Cyclopentadienyl complexes, formed by reaction of cyclopentadiene or its derivatives with metal salts or carbonyls (78, 217), are not discussed in this review, neither are complexes derived from aromatic systems, e.g., benzene, the cyclo-pentadienyl anion, and the cycloheptatrienyl cation (74, 78, 217), and from acetylides (169, 170), which have been reviewed elsewhere. 

The above type of bonding is assumed to occur in other metal-olefin and metal-acetylene complexes (172). Acetylenes have two mutually perpendicular sets of ir-orbitals and are therefore capable of being bonded to one or to two metal atoms both types of complexes are known. When the hydrocarbon is a nonconjugated polyolefin e.g., cyclo-octa-1,5-diene, each C C bond interacts independently with the metal atom. In complexes of conjugated polyolefins, e.g., cyclopentadiene, infrared and nuclear magnetic resonance studies (99) indicate that it is not yet possible to distinguish between structure (IV), in which each C C bond independently contributes two --electrons to the metal-olefin bonding, and structure (V), in which... 

The proposed structures for these complexes are shown in (XXXVII) and (XXXVIII). The acetylene is bonded to the metal atom through its triple bond, as shown by the lowering of some 200 cm-1 in the C C stretching frequency on complex formation. In addition, the hydroxyl groups interact with the 6p2 or oct -orbitals of the metal atom, as shown by the... 

Thus only two of the copper atoms are bonded to the trimethylphosphincs and each phenylethynyl group appears to be associated with three copper atoms. The four copper atoms of the tetramer lie approximately in the same plane. When the acetylide Cu-C C-Ph is heated with acetic acid the complex Cu2CioH802 is obtained (201). This is probably an acetylenic complex (XLI R — Cu), since an analogous complex (XLI R = Ph) is ob-... 

The production of two moles of carbon monoxide and the 18-electron rule lead us to predict that the acetylene molecule is acting as a four-electron donor. In fact this is just one of many complexes in which alkynes bind in this fashion.81 For example, the structure of the diphenylacetylene complex in Fig. 15.26 shows that the positions of the two rhodium atoms are such as to allow overlap with both tr orbitals in the carbon-carbon triple bond.82 The extent of back donation into the antibondirg orbitals determines the lengthening of the C—C bond and the extent to which the C—H bonds are bent away from the complex. Bond length values vary greatly from system to... 

The a-acetylene complex undergoes subsequent reductive cleavage to methane (equation 20). The photoinduced o-ir acetylene bond rearrangement clearly explains the lack of reductive cleavage of dimethylacetylene since this transformation is not possible. The... 

It is apparent that the species, referred to here as a surface complex, is closely related to the acetylenic complex observed by Beeck (5). There are two major conceptual differences between the infrared surface complex and Beeck s acetylenic complex. It is commonly assumed that the carbons in the acetylenic complex would be unsaturated, although this point was not emphasized by Beeck. The infrared results indicate the carbons are saturated even though the number of hydrogens per carbon is low. It is likely that this saturation is attained by formation of C—C bonds between adsorbed C2 units, by bonding of a carbon atom to two nickel atoms, or by both. 

Photochemical reactions have been used for the preparation of various olefin, and acetylene complexes (7). Application to the coordination of dienes as ligands has not been used extensively, so far. In this article the preparative aspects of the photochemistry of carbonyls of the group 6 and group 7 elements and some key derivatives, with the exception of technetium, with conjugated and cumulated dienes will be described. Not only carbonyl substitution reactions by the dienes, but also C—C bond formation, C—H activation, C—H cleavage, and isomerizations due to H shifts, have been observed, thereby leading to various types of complexes. 

As was noted in the discussion of olefin complexes, a twisting of the C=C bond is usually observed in acetylene complexes. This twisting is manifested in a nonzero R—C=C—R torsion angle. Angles y and 5, defined the same way as for olefin complexes, should ideally be 0° and 180°, respectively. Values of y up to 9° have been observed, and the two 8 angles are not necessarily equal (Table I). As for olefin complexes, the differences in the 5 s can be attributed to nonbonded interactions, both intra- and intermolecular. 

The field of acetylene complex chemistry continues to develop rapidly and to yield novel discoveries. A number of recent reviews 1-10) covers various facets including preparation, structure, nature of bonding, stoichiometric and catalytic reactions, and specific aspects with particular metals. The first part of this account is confined to those facets associated with the nature of the interactions between acetylenes and transition metals and to the insertion reactions of complexes closely related to catalysis. Although only scattered data are available, attempts will be made to give a consistent interpretation of the reactivities of coordinated acetylene in terms of a qualitative molecular orbital picture. 

The C=C Bond Lengths and Deformation Angles in Acetylene Complexes... 

---