Accounting for dynamic correlation

The complementarity of variational- and perturbative-type approaches, specifically of Cl and CC methods, should now be obvious While the former ones can simultaneously handle a multitude of states of an arbitrary spin multiplicity, accounting well for nondynamic correlation in cases of quasidegeneracy, they are not size-extensive and are unable to properly describe dynamic correlation effects unless excessively large dimensions can be handled or afforded. On the other hand, CC approaches are size-extensive at any level of truncation and very efficiently account for dynamic correlation, yet encounter serious difficulties in the presence of significant nondynamic correlation effects. In view of this complementarity, a conjoint treatment, if at all feasible, would be highly desirable. 

This part takes account for dynamic correlation between the test particles and the finite system and is necessary for the complete description of two particle excitation processes. Of course, also here the unphysical components of the extended states enter. 

In this chapter, the quantum chemical simulation of actinide and lanthanide complexes will be considered. The need for a multiconfigurational description of the wavefimction is discussed, and the complete-active-space self-consistent-field (CASSCF) approach, along with some related methods, is introduced and discussed. This approach, originally developed by Bj om Roos, allows for the strong static correlation present in these complexes due to a combination of electron-electron interactions and weak crystal field splittings to be taken into consideration in a systematic manner. Extensions to this approach, which also account for dynamical correlation will also be considered, fit the finally section, the application of the CASSCF approach will be illustrated with examples from the literature. 

As will be shown in Section 3, inelastic X-ray scattering experiments can help to decide which theoretical approach is appropriate. One must keep in mind that this static correction is far from an appropriate description of electron correlations. A more accurate way is to account for dynamical screening by writing %(q, co) in terms of the one-particle Greens function G(p, e) corrected for many-particle effects by a... 

Accounting for electron correlation in a second step, via the mixing of a limited number of Slater determinants in the total wave function. Electron correlation is very important for correct treatment of interelectronic interactions and for a quantitative description of covalence effects and of the structure of multielec-tronic states. Accounting completely for the total electronic correlation is computationally extremely difficult, and is only possible for very small molecules, within a limited basis set. Formally, electron correlation can be divided into static, when all Slater determinants corresponding to all possible electron populations of frontier orbitals are considered, and dynamic correlation, which takes into account the effects of dynamical screening of interelectron interaction. 

Accounting for Dynamical Electron Correlation An Important Step Towards Accurate Predictions... 

Because of the inherent limitations of such semiempirical procedures, they can only be relied upon for yielding predictions for a limited set of data, the range of which includes the set of experimental data used for their parametrization. As such data are less abundant for open-shell species, such as radical ions, it is not surprising that there are examples of dramatic failures of semiempirical methods in predicting their electronic spectra, some of which will be discussed later. Ab initio methods are not burdened by these limitations but, as mentioned above, they require additional computations to account for dynamic electron correlation. 

Therefore we expect Df, identified as the fast diffusion coefficient measured in dynamic light-scattering experiments, in infinitely dilute polyelectrolyte solutions to be very high at low salt concentrations and to decrease to self-diffusion coefficient D KRg 1) as the salt concentration is increased. The above result for KRg 1 limit is analogous to the Nernst-Hartley equation reported in Ref. 33. The theory described here accounts for stmctural correlations inside poly electrolyte chains. 

While fewer data are available, the utility of DFT in computing the bond strengths between transition metals and hydrides, methyl groups, and methylene groups has also been demonstrated (Table 8.2). Because of the non-dynamical correlation problem associated with the partially filled metal d orbitals, such binding energies are usually very poorly predicted by MO theory methods, until quite high levels are used to account for electron correlation. 

Our recently developed reduced multireference (RMR) CCSD method [16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25] represents such a combined approach. In essence, this is a version of the so-called externally corrected CCSD method [26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34] that uses a low dimensional MR CISD as an external source. Thus, rather than neglecting higher-than-pair cluster amplitudes, as is done in standard CCSD, it uses approximate values for triply and quadruply excited cluster amplitudes that are extracted by the cluster analysis from the MR CISD wave function. The latter is based on a small active space, yet large enough to allow proper dissociation, and thus a proper account of dynamic correlation. It is the objective of this paper to review this approach in more detail and to illustrate its performance on a few examples. 

---