Acceptor solvents Acetonitrile

A strong acceptor TCNE undergoes [2+2] rather than [4+2] cycloaddition reactions even with dienes. 1,1-Diphenylbutadiene [20] and 2,5-dimethyl-2,4-hexadiene (Scheme 5) [21] afford mainly and exclusively vinyl cyclobutane derivatives, respectively. In the reactions of 2,5-dimethyl-2,4-hexadiene (1) the observed rate constant, is greater for chloroform solvent than for a more polar solvent, acetonitrile (2) the trapping of a zwitterion intermediate by either methanol or p-toluenethiol was unsuccessful (3) radical initiators such as benzyl peroxide, or radical inhibitors like hydroquinone, have no effect on the rate (4) the entropies of activation are of... 

None of the zeroth-order partial correlation coefficients involving ae was significant. It seems fairly certain that the electronic demand in the reaction in set CR2abc is 0. The rate of the reaction is accelerated by electron donor substituents and decelerated by electron acceptor groups. This situation is reversed in set CR2d. The best explanation of these observations is that the mechanism in the most polar solvent, acetonitrile, is different... 

The monocationic intermediate Ar2pe+ subsequently looses its two aromatic ligands by replacing them with solvent (acetonitrile) molecules (Ari), and then reacts k2) with another 6 (arene)iron(II) acceptor in an electron-transfer chain (ETC) process which results in a catalytic deligation of Ar2Fe + [164, 165] (Eqs 39, 40). 

However, donor-acceptor interactions are affected not only by the Lewis acid and base strengths, but also by other, steric and electron structural, factors. Thus, even in systems where either solely the donor or the acceptor property of the solvent is manifested, solvents with different space requirements may interact to different extents because of the steric properties of the reference solute and a reference acceptor with a tendency for dative 7c-bonding (back-coordination) will interact more strongly with jr-acceptor solvent molecules (e.g., acetonitrile) than would be expected from their basicity. The solvent donicity investigations by Burger et al [Bu 71, 74] with transition metal complex reference acceptor model systems have clearly shown the great extent to which such secondary effects may distort the solvent scale. 

The rates of reaction of copper, zinc and uranium with dinitrogen tetroxide are greatly increased in the presence of acetonitrile Reactions of this type lead to the formation of acetonitrile complexes of the corresponding nitrate, which may loose coordinated acetonitrile by pumping in vacvo or heating. Reactions in such mixed acceptor solvent-donor solvent systems may provide unusual solvent properties and it is desirable that such systems should be investigated in considerable detail. 

Re) crystallization of form II from acetonitrile in humid atmosphere leads to the formation of phase IV, which comprises both tautomers of H3TBA, keto and enol one (Scheme 13.25b). Two tautomers associate through O-H- -O, N-H- -O, and N-H- - -S hydrogen bonds into 2D networks, while employing a greater number of HB donors/acceptors as compared to other phases. It should be noted that phase IV was also established as the thermodynamically stable form of HgTBA at ambient conditions as confirmed by slurry experiments in several solvents (acetonitrile, ethanol, and chloroform) [25]. 

It is easy to see that, for instance, water is a more polar solvent than heptane. Water has a dipole moment, is both a proton donor and acceptor and will dissolve ionic solutes. Similarly, methanol and acetonitrile are both more polar than heptane, but it is not so easy to assign relative polarities to methanol and acetonitrile. 

We have also examined the behavior of copolymers of o-tolyl vinyl ketone and methyl vinyl ketone (CoMT). In this case the light is absorbed exclusively at the aromatic carbonyl chromophore and the reaction proceeds from this site, while the methyl vinyl ketone moieties provide a relatively constant environment but prevent energy migration along the chain. The values of Tg and Tip in benzene have been included in Table II. These copolymers axe also soluble in some polar solvents for example, we have used a mixture of acetonitrile acetone methanol (30 30 Uo, referred to as AAM). This mixture is also a good solvent for the electron acceptor paraquat (PQ++) which has been shown to be good biradical trap in a number of other systems (9.). 

This class of donor is activated by soft Lewis acids, such as copper triflate at room temperature, and despite their hydrolytic instability, they appear inert to conditions of sulfoxide activation, TMSOTf or Tf20 (Scheme 4.53). Activation is achieved with stoichiometric promoter in the presence of the acceptor alcohol, and although the mechanism has not been investigated, presumably it proceeds via coordination followed by collapse to a stabilized oxacarbenium ion. The method is compatible with standard glycosidation solvents such as dichloromethane, acetonitrile and diethyl ether, and ester-directed couplings do not lead to orthoesters, perhaps as a result of the presence of the Lewis acid promoter [303,304]. 

Decomposition of sulfonyl azides was shown to be catalyzed by copper in 1967 (72, 73). In the presence of alkenes, the reaction provides both aziridines and the C-H insertion products, albeit in low yields (73). In 1991, Evans et al. (74, 75) illustrated that both Cu(I) and Cu(II) salts were effective catalysts for nitrenoid transfer from [A-(/Moluenesulfonyl)imino]phenyliodinane (PhI=NTs) to a variety of acceptor alkenes. In the absence of ancillary ligands, reactions proceed best in polar aprotic solvents such as acetonitrile. Similar results are observed using both Cu(MeCN)4C104 and Cu(acac)2 as precatalysts, Eq. 53. 

As discussed by Wayner et al. [76], acetonitrile and ethyl acetate are strong Lewis bases, acting as proton acceptors from phenol. The hydrogen bond between PhOH and the solvent makes Aso v//° (PhOH) more negative than ASO V/7°(PhO). The remaining solvents included in figure 5.2 (benzene, carbon tetrachloride, and isooctane) are weaker Lewis bases and their interactions with PhOH and PhO are more similar. 

Hydrogen bond donor solvents are simply those containing a hydrogen atom bound to an electronegative atom. These are often referred to as protic solvents, and the class includes water, carboxylic acids, alcohols and amines. For chemical reactions that involve the use of easily hydrolysed or solvolysed compounds, such as AICI3, it is important to avoid protic solvents. Hydrogen bond acceptors are solvents that have a lone pair available for donation, and include acetonitrile, pyridine and acetone. Kamlet-Taft a and ft parameters are solvatochromic measurements of the HBD and HBA properties of solvents, i.e. acidity and basicity, respectively [24], These measurements use the solvatochromic probe molecules V, V-die lliy I -4-n i in tan iline, which acts as a HBA, and 4-nitroaniline, which is a HBA and a HBD (Figure 1.17). 

---