Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Acceptor properties

The contribution of this polar structure to the bonding lowers the energy of the transition state. This may be viewed as a lower activation energy for the addition step and thus a factor which promotes this particular reaction. The effect is clearly larger the greater the difference in the donor-acceptor properties of X and Y. The transition state for the successive addition of the same monomer (whether X or Y substituted) is structure [V] ... [Pg.437]

Table 7.4 lists the Q and e values for an assortment of common monomers. The extremes in the column of e values in Table 7.4—which are listed in order-quantify the range of donor-acceptor properties which is used as the basis for ranking in Fig. 7.2. The Q values perform a similar ranking with respect to resonance effects. The eight different Q-e combinations in Table 7.4 allow the estimation of ri and values for 28 different copolymers. Of course, in these systems Q and e values were assigned to give the best fit to r values which had already been measured. As an illustration of the predictive values of the Q-e scheme, consider the following example ... [Pg.446]

Despite this, they are good solvents for chloride-ion transfer reactions, and solvo-acid-solvo-base reactions (p. 827) can be followed conductimetri-cally, voltametrically or by use of coloured indicators. As expected from their constitution, the trihalides of As and Sb are only feeble electron-pair donors (p. 198) but they have marked acceptor properties, particularly towards halide ions (p. 564) and amines. [Pg.561]

Osmium(II) forms no hexaaquo complex and [Os(NH3)g] +, which may possibly be present in potassium/liquid NH3 solutions, is also unstable. [Os(NH3)5N2] and other dinitrogen complexes are known but only ligands with good 7r-acceptor properties, such as CN, bipy, phen, phosphines and arsines, really stabilize Os , and these form complexes similar to their Ru analogues. [Pg.1097]

In order to distinguish between kinetic and thermodynamic phenomena it is convenient to refer to the former as the 7tr/ i-effect and the latter as the tra/u-influence or static /ra/u-effect". though this nomenclature is by no means universally accepted. However, it appears that to account satisfactorily for the kinetic /rau.s-effect , both it (kinetic) and a (thermodynamic) effects must be invoked to greater or les.ser extents. Thus, for ligands which are low in the Trans series (e.g. halides), the order can be explained on the basis of a u effect whereas for ligands which arc high in the series the order is best interpreted on the basis of a jt effect. Even so, the relatively high position of H , which can have no rr-acceptor properties, seems to be a result of a a mechanism or some other interaction. [Pg.1164]

The mechanism by which this low oxidation state is stabilized for this triad has been the subject of some debate. That it is not straightforward is clear from the fact that, in contrast to nickel, palladium and platinum require the presence of phosphines for the formation of stable carbonyls. For most transition metals the TT-acceptor properties of the ligand are thought to be of considerable importance and there is... [Pg.1166]

Cations with noble gas configurations. The alkali metals, alkaline earths and aluminium belong to this group which exhibit Class A acceptor properties. Electrostatic forces predominate in complex formation, so interactions... [Pg.53]

Cations with completely filled d sub-shells. Typical of this group are copper(I), silver(I) and gold(I) which exhibit Class B acceptor properties. These ions have high polarising power and the bonds formed in their complexes have appreciable covalent character. [Pg.54]

IV. DONOR-ACCEPTOR PROPERTIES OF SULFONES AND SULFOXIDES IN PHOTOCHEMISTRY... [Pg.1068]

Modification of the acceptor properties of the metal atom may be achieved by using complexes containing 7r-cyclopentadienyl ligands. [Pg.216]

We postulated a reaction mechanism with participation of an aromatic radical cation which was formed by one electron transfer from an aromatic hydrocarbon to copper(II) chloride. Activated alumina has electron-acceptor properties, and formation of a radical cation of an aromatic hydrocarbon adsorbed on alumina has been observed by ESR (ref. 13). Therefore, it seemed to us that alumina as a support facilitates the generation of the radical cation of the aromatic hydrocarbon. [Pg.21]

Dihydro-l,2,5-thiadiboroles (Et2C2B2R2S) have remarkable acceptor properties toward metal-ligand moieties. Dihydrothiadiborole-derived complexes can be achieved thermally or photochemically, e.g., Co and Fe sandwich, triple-decked and even tetradecked complexes are known, all having direct metal-boron bonds. [Pg.73]

Random copolymerization occnrs between butadiene and styrene [15]. There are no appreciable differences in the nncleophilic and electrophilic abilities between the radical centers with the vinyl and phenyl groups at the end of the growing polymer chain or in the donor/acceptor properties between the monomers. [Pg.20]

The kinetic stabilities and the donor-acceptor properties of cyclic conjugated molecules [68] have been described (Scheme 12) in the theoretical subsection (Sect. 2.2.2) to be controlled by the phase property. There is a parallelism between the thermodynamic and kinetic stabilities. An aromatic molecule, benzene, is kinetically stable, and an antiaromatic molecule, cyclobutadiene, is kinetically unstable (Scheme 13). [Pg.111]

Consideration was given to effects, such as the acceptor properties of silicon and the silicon-halogen bond energies, which determined whether monomeric structures were retained. A mechanism for the exchange reactions was as formulated in which an intermediate, e.g. (34), was involved. [Pg.209]

The force constants of the Ni—P bond in P " nickel carbonyl complexes increase in the order MeaP < PHg < P(OMe)a < PFs. This order is different from that of the donor-acceptor character, as estimated from uco-The lengthening of the P—O bond of triphenylphosphine oxide upon complexation with uranium oxide has been estimated by i.r. spectroscopy. However, A -ray diffraction shows little difference in the P-O bond lengths (see Section 7). Some SCF-MO calculations on the donor-acceptor properties of McaPO and H3PO have been reported. [Pg.275]

Yatsimirskii, K. (1970). Acid-base and donor-acceptor properties of ions and molecules. Theoretical and Experimental Chemistry (USSR), 6, 376-80. [Pg.29]

As with donor particles, in order to resolve the posed problem it is initially necessary to prove experimentally a rigorous validity relationships derived in above domain of parameters (pressure and temperature) based on substantially wide number of experimental results. It is known that when preparing such experiments it is recommended to avoid various reefs which may provoke an experimentalist to take wrong assumptions for real, or to hide from a theorist, for example, simple functions in relationships analysed. Pioneering experiments conducted with acceptors involved such active particles as molecular oxygen which on the one hand possesses strong acceptor properties, and on the other is a fairly widespread and chemically sufficiently stable element. [Pg.194]

X Benzene 80.1 0.03-0.1 Prinarily dispersion with weak proton -acceptor properties. Polarizable in induction Interactions. [Pg.618]


See other pages where Acceptor properties is mentioned: [Pg.89]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.568]    [Pg.902]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.587]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.1047]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.1047]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.42]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.397 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.397 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.397 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.141 ]




SEARCH



Acceptor materials, properties

Acceptor properties, solvents

Bond properties donor-acceptor

Chlorophyll, donor/acceptor properties

Donor and Acceptor Properties of Ligands

Donor-acceptor copolymers properties

Donor-acceptor energy levels property, energies

Electron acceptor properties

Electron-acceptor properties, molecular

Fullerene electron acceptor properties

Ir-acceptor properties

Ligand acceptor/donor properties

N acceptor properties

Organic donor-acceptor properties

Properties donor-acceptor

Rr-acceptor properties

Solvents, acceptor properties acidity/basicity

Solvents, acceptor properties conductivity

Solvents, acceptor properties density

Solvents, acceptor properties dipole moment

Solvents, acceptor properties electron pair acceptance

Solvents, acceptor properties hydrogen bond acceptance

Solvents, acceptor properties hydrogen bonded

Solvents, acceptor properties miscibility with water

© 2024 chempedia.info