Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Writing revision

Choosing what information to include in your resume, how to present that information, and finally, how you should customize your resume to target a specific job takes a lot of thought, creativity, and planning. Chances are, you will need to write, revise, and edit your resume multiple times before you create a document that you believe offers a preview of who you are and what you are capable of. [Pg.4]

The procedure calls for the same individual who writes/revises the [software] program to validate the program. [Pg.241]

National Building Specification (NBS) http //www.thenbs.com/ (accessed November 3,2010). The main purpose is to write, revise, and publish the National Building Specification. The NBS was... [Pg.154]

Other Emissions. Tide 3 of the CAAA also impacts power plant particulate matter (ash) emissions. In June of 1994, the EPA actually relaxed its standards for emissions of particulate smaller than 10 micrometers (PMIO). This revision was in response to the EPA s mandate to review health-based poUution standards every dve years (12). However, it is uncertain as of this writing (1996) if states will indeed implement less stringent regulations for PMIO emissions. [Pg.91]

As discussed in Chapter 2, The Toller Selection Process, evaluating the site s safe work practice procedures should have been a part of the review during the toller selection process. Still, new materials may indicate a need to revise or develop special procedures to address unique chemical and physical hazards. New hazards such as vacuum, ciyogenics, ultra-high pressure, or new rotating equipment could be introduced. Medical monitoring requirements or special handling and spill response procedures for the toll s raw materials and products may indicate a need to write or revise safe work practices. [Pg.88]

To date, a number of simulation studies have been performed on nucleic acids and proteins using both AMBER and CHARMM. A direct comparison of crystal simulations of bovine pancreatic trypsin inliibitor show that the two force fields behave similarly, although differences in solvent-protein interactions are evident [24]. Side-by-side tests have also been performed on a DNA duplex, showing both force fields to be in reasonable agreement with experiment although significant, and different, problems were evident in both cases [25]. It should be noted that as of the writing of this chapter revised versions of both the AMBER and CHARMM nucleic acid force fields had become available. Several simulations of membranes have been performed with the CHARMM force field for both saturated [26] and unsaturated [27] lipids. The availability of both protein and nucleic acid parameters in AMBER and CHARMM allows for protein-nucleic acid complexes to be studied with both force fields (see Chapter 20), whereas protein-lipid (see Chapter 21) and DNA-lipid simulations can also be performed with CHARMM. [Pg.13]

One way of identifying obsolete documents is to write SUPERSEDED or OBSOLETE on the front cover, but doing this requires that the custodian is informed. When a version of a document is replaced with a new version, the withdrawal of the obsolete version can be accomplished in the amendment instructions that accompany the revision. When documents become obsolete by total replacement, their withdrawal can also be accomplished with the amendment instruction. However, where a document becomes obsolete and is not replaced there needs to be a Document Withdrawal Notice which informs the custodian of the action to be taken and the reason for withdrawal. [Pg.296]

I would like to thank Dr. Geraint O. Thomas (Centre for Explosion Studies, Department of Physics, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, UK) for offering to write Chapter 4. He prepared the first draft, but due to a sabbatical in Japan and other research commitments, he was unable to write the revisions. However, he did make constructive comments and suggestions on the revisions that I wrote. In addition, I would like to thank the following other individuals who provided me with technical data and other assistance based on their knowledge of flame arresters and combustion science and technology G. Binks (IMI Amal), R. Butler (Enardo). K. Chatrathi... [Pg.216]

The recent revision of the main anodising standard (BS 1615 1987) has changed it from a specification to a method for specifying , but it provides all the information necessary to write an appropriate specification for any anodised product. [Pg.704]

E The writing has again been revised at the sentence level, streamlining the presentation, improving explanations, and updating a thousand small details. Several little-used reactions have been deleted (the alkali fusion of arene-sulfonic acids to give phenols, for instance), and a few new ones have been added (the Sharpless enantioselective epoxidation of alkene.s, for instance). [Pg.1336]

Dr. Charles Dumoulln is acknowledged for writing the original version of the Polymer Analysis program. Annmarie Lareau made some revisions and documented the code. [Pg.172]

We would like to thank Dr. Paul Omstein for his advice and technical direction during this work. Also, we thank Dr. John Masters for his help and discussions during the writing of this manuscript and Dr. James Audia for his revisions. [Pg.68]

Suggested revisions are invited and should be submitted to the director of the Manufacturing, Distribution and Marketing Department. Write to the American Petroleum Institute, 1220 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005. [Pg.27]

Describe, for the tenth time, an instrument not covered in the laboratory book, and you write a procedure. Explain, again and again, operations that are in the book, and you get a set of notes. When these produce questions you revise until the students, not you, finally have it right. It you believe that writing is solidified speech—with the same pauses, the same cadences—then a style is set. And if you can still laugh, you write this book. [Pg.331]

When revising your writing, say the words it is when you come across it s or its. If they make sense, you should be using the contraction. If they don t, you need the possessive form, its, without an apostrophe. [Pg.126]


See other pages where Writing revision is mentioned: [Pg.905]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.905]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.1444]    [Pg.1405]    [Pg.1336]    [Pg.904]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.774]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.136]   


SEARCH



Revised

Revisions

Separating writing from revision,

Writing revising text

© 2024 chempedia.info