Worker Protection Standards

Employees who work in hazardous waste operations want to be able 

The law proposed standards that facilities must follow to protect the 

Regulations were issued on these standards that include but are not 

Handling. Requirements for the handling, transporting, labeling, and disposing of hazardous wastes 

New Technology Program. Requirements for a program that introduces new equipment or technologies that will maintain worker 

---

The mission of the OSHA is to save lives, prevent injuries, and protect the health of employees in the workplace.25 OSHA accomplishes these goals through several regulatory requirements including the hazard communication standard (HCS) and the Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Worker Protection Standard (HAZWOPER). 

Hazardous waste operations and emergency response worker protection standard... 

The second difference pertains to the derivation of Dj to protect workers. Historically, it has been assumed that workers are normally healthier than the general population, and show less variability in response to chemical exposure. Worker protection standards are thus routinely less restrictive than those covering the general population. Elncertainty factors used to derive worker protective limits are normally smaller than those used for the general population. 

A database based on these standards could significantly raise the quality of the program-wide database, reduce start-up problems, and facilitate CSDP s attainment of worker protection standards. 

In 1992, the USEPA published its Worker Protection Standard (WPS) Final Rule (USEPA, 1992). This WPS contains provisions intended to inform agricultural employees about the hazards of pesticides, and provides specific protective clothing requirements for pesticide handlers. In conducting any field study, the... 

USEPA (1992). Worker Protection Standard (Final Rule), Federal Register, 57(163), 38102-38166, August 21, Washington, DC, USA. 

There are currently two approaches for setting REIs in the United States one might be considered the past approach and the other the future approach. In the first approach, the EPA s Worker Protection Standards establish interim REIs based only on acute toxicity without any consideration of the crop, the work activity or exposure. Recognizing that risk is a product of toxicity and exposure, this approach is limited in that it only takes into account one-half of the risk equation. Nonetheless, this approach is the basis for most of the REIs currently in place in the USA. In the second approach, the EPA s re-registration process (as outlined in the Worker Protection Standards) requires the development of product, crop and activity-specific REIs based on the risk associated with any given use scenario. The advantage of this approach is that it takes into account both the toxicity and exposure components of the risk equation. Such an approach is the... 

During the past ten years several important new and revised regulations have been issued. These regulations have mandated new certifications and training for those involved directly or indirectly with the application of pesticides. In addition, in 1992, EPA issued the Worker Protection Standard which mandated training for all agricultural workers and pesticide handlers and detailed the content of such training. 

WORKER PROTECTION STANDARD FOR AGRICULTURAL PESTICIDES (40 CFR Part 170, 1992)... 

Figure 2.2 On-site training using the EPA Worker Protection Standard as a training guide (EPA, Protect Yourself from Pesticides-poster EPA 735-H-93-001).

U.S. Enviromnental Protection Agency, The Worker Protection Standard for Agricultural Pesticides—How to Comply What Employers Need to Know, 1993. 

Worker protection and work practice requirements under the following rules must be followed 29 C.ER. 1926.58 (Occupational Safety and Health Administration asbestos worker protection standards for construction), 40 C.ER. Part 763, subpart G (EPA asbestos worker protection standards for public employees), and 40 C.ER. Part 61, subpart M (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants—Asbestos). 40 C.ER. 763.90(h). 

Over the years, Oregon has adopted a number of major safety and health standards that, while deemed as effective as comparable federal standards, also have significant differences, ( egon has also adopted a number of state-initiated rules for which there are no federal counterparts, including Forest Activity Standards, Agriculture Standards, Firefighter Standards, and Pesticide Worker Protection Standards. 

---