Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Wavefunctions, properties

Fig. 1. The probability of the two He atoms in Xe" He2 being at relative distance r. The result shown is for the ground state. The result shows the highly delocalized distribution of the He atoms within the cluster even in its ground state. (An extraordinary behavior ) The solid line in Fig. 1 represents SCF results, the diamonds exact Cl results, and the close agreement between the two indicates the high accuracy of SCF in "good coordinates" even for an atom-atom distance distribution, which is basically a wavefunction property. This picture is reinforced when one considers the second excited state of Xe" He2. The excited mode is, in the hyperspherical nomenclature, the K-mode. As before, the copied line is SCF, and the diamond "exact". Fig. 1. The probability of the two He atoms in Xe" He2 being at relative distance r. The result shown is for the ground state. The result shows the highly delocalized distribution of the He atoms within the cluster even in its ground state. (An extraordinary behavior ) The solid line in Fig. 1 represents SCF results, the diamonds exact Cl results, and the close agreement between the two indicates the high accuracy of SCF in "good coordinates" even for an atom-atom distance distribution, which is basically a wavefunction property. This picture is reinforced when one considers the second excited state of Xe" He2. The excited mode is, in the hyperspherical nomenclature, the K-mode. As before, the copied line is SCF, and the diamond "exact".
To extract infomiation from the wavefimction about properties other than the probability density, additional postulates are needed. All of these rely upon the mathematical concepts of operators, eigenvalues and eigenfiinctions. An extensive discussion of these important elements of the fomialism of quantum mechanics is precluded by space limitations. For fiirther details, the reader is referred to the reading list supplied at the end of this chapter. In quantum mechanics, the classical notions of position, momentum, energy etc are replaced by mathematical operators that act upon the wavefunction to provide infomiation about the system. The third postulate relates to certain properties of these operators ... [Pg.7]

Electrons, protons and neutrons and all other particles that have s = are known as fennions. Other particles are restricted to s = 0 or 1 and are known as bosons. There are thus profound differences in the quantum-mechanical properties of fennions and bosons, which have important implications in fields ranging from statistical mechanics to spectroscopic selection mles. It can be shown that the spin quantum number S associated with an even number of fennions must be integral, while that for an odd number of them must be half-integral. The resulting composite particles behave collectively like bosons and fennions, respectively, so the wavefunction synnnetry properties associated with bosons can be relevant in chemical physics. One prominent example is the treatment of nuclei, which are typically considered as composite particles rather than interacting protons and neutrons. Nuclei with even atomic number tlierefore behave like individual bosons and those with odd atomic number as fennions, a distinction that plays an important role in rotational spectroscopy of polyatomic molecules. [Pg.30]

A completely difierent approach to scattering involves writing down an expression that can be used to obtain S directly from the wavefunction, and which is stationary with respect to small errors in die waveftmction. In this case one can obtain the scattering matrix element by variational theory. A recent review of this topic has been given by Miller [32]. There are many different expressions that give S as a ftmctional of the wavefunction and, therefore, there are many different variational theories. This section describes the Kohn variational theory, which has proven particularly useftil in many applications in chemical reaction dynamics. To keep the derivation as simple as possible, we restrict our consideration to potentials of die type plotted in figure A3.11.1(c) where the waveftmcfton vanishes in the limit of v -oo, and where the Smatrix is a scalar property so we can drop the matrix notation. [Pg.968]

Our intention is to give a brief survey of advanced theoretical methods used to detennine the electronic and geometric stmcture of solids and surfaces. The electronic stmcture encompasses the energies and wavefunctions (and other properties derived from them) of the electronic states in solids, while the geometric stmcture refers to the equilibrium atomic positions. Quantities that can be derived from the electronic stmcture calculations include the electronic (electron energies, charge densities), vibrational (phonon spectra), stmctiiral (lattice constants, equilibrium stmctiires), mechanical (bulk moduli, elastic constants) and optical (absorption, transmission) properties of crystals. We will also report on teclmiques used to study solid surfaces, with particular examples drawn from chemisorption on transition metal surfaces. [Pg.2201]

It turns out that the CSP approximation dominates the full wavefunction, and is therefore almost exact till t 80 fs. This timescale is already very useful The first Rs 20 fs are sufficient to determine the photoadsorption lineshape and, as turns out, the first 80 fs are sufficient to determine the Resonance Raman spectrum of the system. Simple CSP is almost exact for these properties. As Fig. 3 shows, for later times the accuracy of the CSP decays quickly for t 500 fs in this system, the contribution of the CSP approximation to the full Cl wavefunction is almost negligible. In addition, this wavefunction is dominated not by a few specific terms of the Cl expansion, but by a whole host of configurations. The decay of the CSP approximation was found to be due to hard collisions between the iodine atoms and the surrounding wall of argons. Already the first hard collision brings a major deterioration of the CSP approximation, but also the role of the second collision can be clearly identified. As was mentioned, for t < 80 fs, the CSP... [Pg.373]

Approximation Property We assume that the classical wavefunction 4> is an approximate 5-function, i.e., for all times t G [0, T] the probability density 4> t) = 4> q,t) is concentrated near a location q t) with width, i.e., position uncertainty, 6 t). Then, the quality of the TDSCF approximation can be characterized as follows ... [Pg.382]

The function/( C) may have a very simple form, as is the case for the calculation of the molecular weight from the relative atomic masses. In most cases, however,/( Cj will be very complicated when it comes to describe the structure by quantum mechanical means and the property may be derived directly from the wavefunction for example, the dipole moment may be obtained by applying the dipole operator. [Pg.488]

Tie first consideration is that the total wavefunction and the molecular properties calculated rom it should be the same when a transformed basis set is used. We have already encoun-ered this requirement in our discussion of the transformation of the Roothaan-Hall quations to an orthogonal set. To reiterate suppose a molecular orbital is written as a inear combination of atomic orbitals ... [Pg.108]

Quantum mechanics has a set of rules that link operators, wavefunctions, and eigenvalues to physically measurable properties. These rules have been formulated not in some arbitrary manner nor by derivation from some higher subject. Rather, the rules were designed to allow quantum mechanics to mimic the experimentally observed facts as revealed in mother nature s data. The extent to which these rules seem difficult to... [Pg.38]

Such quantization (i.e., constraints on the values that physical properties can realize) will be seen to occur whenever the pertinent wavefunction is constrained to obey a so-called boundary condition (in this case, the boundary condition is ( (Q+2k) = iS (Q)). [Pg.46]

We therefore conclude that the act of carrying out an experimental measurement disturbs the system in that it causes the system s wavefunction to become an eigenfunction of the operator whose property is measured. If two properties whose corresponding operators commute are measured, the measurement of the second property does not destroy knowledge of the first property s value gained in the first measurement. [Pg.50]

On the other hand, as detailed further in Appendix C, if the two properties (F and G) do not commute, the second measurement destroys knowledge of the first property s value. After the first measurement, P is an eigenfunction of F after the second measurement, it becomes an eigenfunction of G. If the two non-commuting operators properties are measured in the opposite order, the wavefunction first is an eigenfunction of G, and subsequently becomes an eigenfunction of F. [Pg.50]

Essentially all experimentally measured properties can be thought of as arising through the response of the system to some externally applied perturbation or disturbance. In turn, the calculation of such properties can be formulated in terms of the response of the energy E or wavefunction P to a perturbation. For example, molecular dipole moments p are measured, via electric-field deflection, in terms of the change in energy... [Pg.507]

To obtain expressions that permit properties other than the energy to be evaluated in terms of the state wavefunction P, the following strategy is used ... [Pg.507]

The energy and many other properties of the particle can be obtained by solving the Schrfldinger equation for P, subject to the appropriate boundary conditions. Many different wavefunctions are solutions to it, corresponding to different stationary states of the system. [Pg.253]

As noted above, many of the common molecular properties don t depend on electron spin. The first step is to average-out the effect of electron spin, and we do this by integrating with respect to si and S2 to give the purely spatial wavefunction... [Pg.100]

Once an approximation to the wavefunction of a molecule has been found, it can be used to calculate the probable result of many physical measurements and hence to predict properties such as a molecular hexadecapole moment or the electric field gradient at a quadrupolar nucleus. For many workers in the field, this is the primary objective for performing quantum-mechanical calculations. But from... [Pg.103]

The STO-3G wavefunction does not have a cusp at the nucleus. Very few molecular properties depend on the exact shape of the wavefunction at the nucleus ... [Pg.166]

A vector space is a set with very special properties, which I don t have time to discuss. Wavefunctions are members of vector spaces. If we identify set A with the set of all possible electron densities for the problem of interest, and set B as the set of all real energies, then / defines a density functional. [Pg.221]

Boys and Cook refer to these properties as primary properties because their electronic contributions can be obtained directly from the electronic wavefunction As a matter of interest, they also classified the electronic energy as a primary property. It can t be calculated as the expectation value of a sum of true one-electron operators, but the Hartree-Fock operator is sometimes written as a sum of pseudo one-electron operators, which include the average effects of the other electrons. [Pg.266]


See other pages where Wavefunctions, properties is mentioned: [Pg.407]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.2210]    [Pg.2313]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.695]    [Pg.507]    [Pg.566]    [Pg.569]    [Pg.570]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.265]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.326 ]




SEARCH



Property-specific wavefunctions

Wavefunction properties

Wavefunction properties

© 2024 chempedia.info