Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Waters anomalies

Finally, we return to the physical meaning of the large difference, for the protic solvents, between the cohesive energy density and the internal pressure Pj, quoted in section 13.1.3. For water this difference is highest with the factor equal to 15.3. At first glance [Pg.757]


Fig. 2. Location of Green Street Occurrence and related radon soil gas and well water anomalies. Fig. 2. Location of Green Street Occurrence and related radon soil gas and well water anomalies.
The concentrations of the major inorganic ions in seawater are well known in estuarine and coastal areas as well as in interstitial waters anomalies in their constant ratios may occur. The major cations are Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+, K+ and Sr2+, the major anions Cl-, SCty2-, HCO3", B(OH) ", F" and Br". Ion pairs involving these elements and H+, OH", CO32-, POif3- and SiOz -. Under anoxic conditions the S2- - ion and bi- and polysulphides become important. A summary of the major ion speciation in seawater is given by Kester et al. (1975). [Pg.7]

In the Atlantic, deep water anomalies in 3He were found to be considerably less than in the Pacific, in accord with the conclusions based on total saturation anomalies (Section 4.3), but nevertheless quite definitely present in a characteristic level <5 He = 5% (Jenkins et al., 1972). Albeit at a lower level than in the Pacific, the deep Atlantic 3He excesses also show considerable structure in a detailed study of the western Atlantic, Jenkins, and Clarke (1976) observed a maximum <53He of 13% and identified a localized source in the Gibbs Fracture Zone southwest of Iceland. To the south (at about 30°N), a section across the Mid-Atlantic Ridge shows no perceptible influence of the ridge itself on <53He (Lupton, 1976), a result in marked contrast to the comparable data for the East Pacific Rise (Figure 4.4). [Pg.115]

Jorgensen, D.G. (1968) An aquifer test used to investigate a quality of water anomaly. Ground Water 6, 18-20. [Pg.442]

As we have mentioned in the Introduction, the location of the critical point of the lowest density liquid-liquid transition of real water is unknown and both scenarios (critical point at positive or at negative pressure) can qualitatively explain water anomalies. Recent simulation studies of confined water show the way, how to locate the liquid-liquid critical point of water. Confinement in hydrophobic pores shifts the temperature of the liquid-liquid transition to lower temperatures (at the same pressure), whereas effect of confinement in hydrophilic pores is opposite. If the liquid-liquid critical point in real water is located at positive pressure, in hydrophobic pores it may be shifted to negative pressures. Alternatively, if the liquid-liquid critical point in real water is located at negative pressure, it may be shifted to positive pressures by confinement in hydrophilic pores. Interestingly, that it may be possible in both cases to place the liquid-liquid critical point at the liquid-vapour coexistence curve by tuning the pore hydrophilicity. We expect, that the experiments with confined supercooled water should finally answer the questions, concerning existence of the liquid-liquid phase transition in supercoleed water and its location. [Pg.123]

Pore Water Anomalies Associated with Gas Hydrate Formation and Decomposition... [Pg.495]

Hesse, R., 2003. Pore water anomalies of submarine gas-hydrate zones as tool to assess hydrate abundance and distribution in the subsurface - what have we learned in the past decade. Earth-Science Reviews, 61 149-179. [Pg.510]

Aquatic organisms are mostly exposed to smaller temperature changes than the land organisms. The fact that water in Nature undergoes much smaller temperature deviations than the air is primarily due to specific physical properties of water (anomalies see Section 3.2). [Pg.327]

We have addressed some of these issues in Chapter 2 (the water anomaly chapter) and shall return to them again later in Chapter 22 to discuss possible reasons for the anomalies. [Pg.89]

Figure 1 shows the phase diagrams that we obtain from the free energy calculations for CTs = 1.35. In fact, the phase diagrams for as = 1.15, 1.35, 1.55, and 1.8 were already reported in Refs [41,45]. We show these phase diagrams here too because they provide the landscape in which possible water anomalies should be positioned. [Pg.84]

WATER PROTON ENVIRONMENT A NEW WATER ANOMALY AT ATOMIC SCALE ... [Pg.175]

Going under the assumption that the form of the excess Cp T) reported in these latter experiments differs completely from that in common glass formers, but resembles that of the classical order-disorder transition, an interesting analysis of these calorimetric data of nanoconlined water has been proposed [122]. Note that the order-disorder transition (critical point-free) scenario differs little from the second critical point scenario, which attributes all water anomalies to the existence of a second critical point. [Pg.251]


See other pages where Waters anomalies is mentioned: [Pg.55]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.413]   


SEARCH



Anomalies bulk water

Anomalies of water

Anomaly

Approaches to understand water anomalies

Gas Hydrate and Water Isotope Anomalies

Water density anomaly

© 2024 chempedia.info