Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Water flux density

C. What is the water flux density at the point of incipient plasmolysis ... [Pg.98]

Generally, 70 to 75% of the water vaporized on land is transpired by plants. This water comes from the soil (soil also affects the C02 fluxes for vegetation). Therefore, after we consider gas fluxes within a plant community, we will examine some of the hydraulic properties of soil. For instance, water in the soil is removed from larger pores before from smaller ones. This removal decreases the soil conductivity for subsequent water movement, and a greater drop in water potential from the bulk soil up to a root is therefore necessary for a particular water flux density. [Pg.440]

This volumetric water flux density directed upward at the soil surface equals (1 x 10-8 m3 m-2 s 1)(l mol/18 x 10-6 m3), or 0.6 x 10-3 mol mT s-1 (= 0.6 mmol m-2 s-1). When discussing water vapor movement in the previous section, we indicated that Jm> emanating from a moist shaded soil is usually 0.2 to 1.0 mmol m-2 s-1, so our calculated flux density is consistent with the range of measured values. The calculation also indicates that a fairly large gradient in hydrostatic pressure can exist near the soil surface. [Pg.464]

Spherical (r + ArlConductance x Force Flux = rAr Fick s first law (Section 9.3E), Heat flux density (Eq. 7.16), Water flux density (Eq. 9.9)... [Pg.466]

Local proton, water vapor and liquid water flux densities in CCL Liquid water and proton flux density at PEM I CCL boundary Critical current density for complete liquid-to-vapor conversion in the CCL Critical current density for flooding within the CCL... [Pg.85]

Resistive limiting current density (A cm ). Equation 4.221 Methanol-limiting current density (A cm ). Equation 5.222 Limiting current density due to oxygen transport in the GDL at the channel inlet (mol cm ). Equation 4.210 Liquid water flux density (Acm )... [Pg.520]

In addition to external conditioning processes and the need to provide internal chemical treatments to some or all steam-water circuits within the steam cycle, the scope of boiler water treatment includes, as mentioned earlier, the provision of suitable technical resources sufficient to control the steam-water chemistry within defined limits appropriate for the boiler plant under consideration. Because these steam-water control limits tend to narrow considerably with increase in boiler pressures (and heat-flux densities), suitable monitoring and control procedures may require implementing actions with knife-edge precision. [Pg.138]

Finally, although the basic development and nature of boiler water plant problems may be similar to those arising in other types of water systems (such as cooling water systems), the extremely high steam-water temperatures and heat-flux densities generally encountered impart a much higher level of intensity. This in turn creates the need for more highly focused and effective solutions to boiler plant problems. [Pg.142]

Under the same conditions of low heat-flux density, poor water chemistry, and gradual scaling circumstances, FT boilers may easily lay down from 1/16 to 1/4 inch of scale (6-12 mm) or more during a 12-month period. Tubes may become bridged by scales and sludges. Again, cleaning is required and the extra costs incurred for wasted fuel can never be recovered. [Pg.147]

The position is slightly different for LP steam-heating boilers, and a softener normally is not required if requirements for MU water do not exceed a minimum level of 5% or if heat-flux densities are low. [Pg.160]

Where LP steam boiler MU requirements are in excess of 5% or heat-flux densities are high but the source of MU water is a naturally low-hardness lean water (as in New York City, where total hardness is often below 20 ppm as CaC03), it is still advisable to install a water... [Pg.160]

If BW silica levels increase above 180 to 200 ppm, it may not, in fact, be possible to totally control silica deposition by water chemistry means alone. Also, as boiler pressures, temperatures, and heat-flux densities increases, so does the need for external silica removal equipment. [Pg.163]

For simple HW and LP steam heating applications, employing perhaps a Scotch marine or firebox FT boiler, the water quality requirements are unlikely to be onerous, but as pressure ratings and heat-flux densities increase (and other factors such as special boiler designs and steam usage applications are taken into consideration) water quality becomes increasingly important. Thus, in general ... [Pg.303]

Heat flux density Heat recovery boiler, see Boiler, water tube, heat recovery 219... [Pg.872]

The magnitude and direction of the net flux density, F, of any gaseous species across an air-water interface is positive if the flux is directed from the atmosphere to the ocean. F is related to the difference in concentration (Ac), in the two phases by the relation... [Pg.80]

The parameters fcg and k are the transfer velocities for chemically unreactive gases through the viscous sublayers in the air and water, respectively. They relate the flux density F to the concentration gradients across the viscous sublayers through expressions similar to Equation (42) ... [Pg.80]

The sediment surface separates a mixture of solid sediment and interstitial water from the overlying water. Growth of the sediment results from accumulation of solid particles and inclusion of water in the pore space between the particles. The rates of sediment deposition vary from a few millimeters per 1000 years in the pelagic ocean up to centimeters per year in lakes and coastal areas. The resulting flux density of solid particles to the sediment surface is normally in the range 0.006 to 6 kg/m per year (Lerman, 1979). The corresponding flux density of materials dissolved in the trapped water is 10 to 10 kg/m per year. Chemical species may also be transported across the sediment surface by other transport processes. The main processes are (Lerman, 1979) ... [Pg.81]

Fig. 1. Rates of CO2 assimilation, A (/miol s ) leaf conductance, g (mol m s ) intercellular partial pressure of CO2, Pi (Pa) soil water potential and leaf water potential, xp (MPa) during gas-exchange measurements of a 30-day-old cotton plant, plotted against day after watering was withheld. Measurements were made with 2 mmol m sec" photon flux density, 30 °C leaf temperature, and 2.0 kPa vapour pressure difference between leaf and air (S.C. Wong, unpublished data). Fig. 1. Rates of CO2 assimilation, A (/miol s ) leaf conductance, g (mol m s ) intercellular partial pressure of CO2, Pi (Pa) soil water potential and leaf water potential, xp (MPa) during gas-exchange measurements of a 30-day-old cotton plant, plotted against day after watering was withheld. Measurements were made with 2 mmol m sec" photon flux density, 30 °C leaf temperature, and 2.0 kPa vapour pressure difference between leaf and air (S.C. Wong, unpublished data).
Fig. 2. Rates of CO2 assimilation,. 4, and leaf conductances, g, as functions of intercellular partial pressure of CO2, p in Zea mays on various days after withholding watering. Measurements made with 9.5,19.0,30.5, and 38.0 Pa ambient partial pressure of CO2, 2 mmol m" s" photon flux density, 30 °C leaf temperature, and 2.0 kPa vapour pressure differences between leaf and air. Closed symbols represent measurements with 30.5 Pa ambient partial pressure of COj. Leaf water potentials were 0.05, - 0.2, - 0.5 and - 0.8 MPa on day 0, 4, 11 and 14, respectively (after Wong et al., 1985). Fig. 2. Rates of CO2 assimilation,. 4, and leaf conductances, g, as functions of intercellular partial pressure of CO2, p in Zea mays on various days after withholding watering. Measurements made with 9.5,19.0,30.5, and 38.0 Pa ambient partial pressure of CO2, 2 mmol m" s" photon flux density, 30 °C leaf temperature, and 2.0 kPa vapour pressure differences between leaf and air. Closed symbols represent measurements with 30.5 Pa ambient partial pressure of COj. Leaf water potentials were 0.05, - 0.2, - 0.5 and - 0.8 MPa on day 0, 4, 11 and 14, respectively (after Wong et al., 1985).
Calculate the concentration at which the rate of deposition of particles per unit area is a maximum and determine this maximum flux for 0.1 mm spheres of glass of density 2600 kg/m3 settling in water of density 1000 kg/m3 and viscosity 1 mN s/m2. [Pg.1155]

The EOD coefficient, is the ratio of the water flux through the membrane to the proton flux in the absence of a water concentration gradient. As r/d,3g increases with increasing current density during PEMFC operation, the level of dehydration increases at the anode and normally exceeds the ability of the PEM to use back diffusion to the anode to achieve balanced water content in the membrane. In addition, accumulation of water at the cathode leads to flooding and concomitant mass transport losses in the PEMFC due to the reduced diffusion rate of O2 reaching the cathode. [Pg.127]

In reality, this behavior is only observed in the limit of small jg. At currents o 1 A cm-2 that are relevant for fuel cell operation, the electro-osmotic coupling between proton and water fluxes causes nonuniform water distributions in PEMs, which lead to nonlinear effects in r/p M- These deviations result in a critical current density, p at which the increase in r/pp j causes the cell voltage to decrease dramatically. It is thus crucial to develop membrane models that can predicton the basis of experimental data on structure and transport properties. [Pg.397]

As can be seen in the different boundary conditions, the main effects of having ribs are electronic conductivity and transport of oxygen and water, especially in the liquid phase. In terms of electronic conductivity, the diffusion media are mainly carbon, a material that is fairly conductive. However, for very hydro-phobic or porous gas-diffusion layers that have a small volume fraction of carbon, electronic conductivity can become important. Because the electrons leave the fuel cell through the ribs, hot spots can develop with large gradients in electron flux density next to the channel. " Furthermore, if the conductivity of the gas-diffusion layer becomes too small, a... [Pg.474]

Table 2.1 lists the measured value of the DMFC current density, the equivalent current density of methanol crossover, the total water flux at a DMFC cathode and the calculated water electro-osmotic drag coefficient from Equation 2.2 at various DMFC operating temperatures. [Pg.56]

Module design Packing density (ft2/ft3) Water flux at 600 psi Salt (gal/ft2 day) rejection Water output per unit volume (gal/ft3 day) Flow channel size (in.) Ease of cleaning... [Pg.640]


See other pages where Water flux density is mentioned: [Pg.65]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.2399]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.2399]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.2038]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.578]    [Pg.746]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.416]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.91 , Pg.156 ]




SEARCH



Flux density

Flux water

Water density

© 2024 chempedia.info