Warning language

To a computer scientist, VS is nothing but another text mining, only the bits and bytes stored that contain molecular information adopt a format quite different from natural language and without adequate warning cannot be quickly interpreted. It is not that modem day text does not contain text that is not natural language, but that they are adequately flagged and do not stop the NLP software. For example,... 

Warning and instructional signs and instruction should be primarily provided in the national language of the country of operation. They should be concise and direct. Use of jargon, slang or local dialect references should always be avoided, as these may not always be correctly interpreted. Abbreviations should be avoided unless the abbreviation is commonly known and used by the population, versus the descriptive word or words. 

Approximately 5 months after the meeting, in the summer of 1984, Leber sent a formal letter to all neuroleptic manufacturers, suggesting a revision of the proposed class warning label. By then, almost surely in response to industry pressure, the proposed language had already been watered down. Without mentioning any figures, Leber s proposed label stated that TD would develop in a substantial portion of patients treated with neuroleptics (P. Leber, unpublished letter, 1984, p. 3). The meaning of substantial was left up to interpretation. 

There are no latches for DebugX and Bdy. However language semantics indicate that Bdy needs to be saved. A synthesis system may not produce a latch it may generate a warning about the variable being used before its assignment and that there is a potential for a functional mismatch. 

The standard requires an employer to identify each hazardous chemical with a label, tag, or other mark clearly identifying the material. All warning labels shall be clearly legible and provided in English, although the employer may in addition voluntarily include the warning in other languages. 

We can now write the Schrodinger equation for any system. The problem is how can we solve it for any system, or for even one system It turns out that we can solve the equation exactly for a one-electron system. All other cases will require some form of approximation. We ll not try to reproduce that solution here. For now we shall concentrate only the solutions and interpret them. A word of warning we revert back to the physicist s notation. In a subsequent chapter, we will explicitly connect the language of the physicist to that of the mathematician. We begin, for completeness, with the Schrodinger equation once more... 

Warning This calculation involves massive amounts of algebra, but if you do it correctly, you ll be rewarded by seeing many wonderful cancellations. Teach yourself Mathematica, Maple, or some other symbolic manipulation language, and do the problem on the computer.)... 

The underlying premise here is that language can create a sense of activity and intensity of the kind that one usually associates exclusively with visual action. Dialogue and visuals must be partners in the short script our goal in this chapter is to show you how to make them partners. Before we do so, however, we will begin with a warning don t use too much dialogue. This may seem to contradict the previous assertion, but a few illustrations will clarify and contextualize the caution. 

---