VSEPR electron-pair repulsion

The tetrahedral geometry of methane is often explained with the valence shell electron pair repulsion (VSEPR) model The VSEPR model rests on the idea that an electron pair either a bonded pair or an unshared pair associated with a particular atom will be as far away from the atom s other electron pairs as possible Thus a tetrahedral geomehy permits the four bonds of methane to be maximally separated and is charac terized by H—C—H angles of 109 5° a value referred to as the tetrahedral angle... 

Valence shell electron pair repulsion (VSEPR) model (Section 110) Method for predicting the shape of a molecule based on the notion that electron pairs surrounding a central atom repel one another Four electron pairs will arrange them selves in a tetrahedral geometry three will assume a trigo nal planar geometry and two electron pairs will adopt a linear arrangement... 

The major features of molecular geometry can be predicted on the basis of a quite simple principle—electron-pair repulsion. This principle is the essence of the valence-shell electron-pair repulsion (VSEPR) model, first suggested by N. V. Sidgwick and H. M. Powell in 1940. It was developed and expanded later by R. J. Gillespie and R. S. Nyholm. According to the VSEPR model, the valence electron pairs surrounding an atom repel one another. Consequently, the orbitals containing those electron pairs are oriented to be as far apart as possible. 

VSEPR model Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion model, used to predict molecular geometry states that electron pairs around a central atom tend to be as far apart as possible, 180-182... 

In some respects arenediazonium ions show analogies to acetylene. Acetylene has two deformation vibrations, v4 at 613.5 cm-1 and v6 at 729.6 cm-1, as shown in Figure 7-1 (Feldmann et al., 1956). The fact that the symmetrical vibration v4 has a lower frequency than v6 can be understood from BartelPs valence-shell electron-pair repulsion (VSEPR) model (1968) on the basis of a <pseudo-Jahn-Teller> effect. 

Two qualitative models have been successful in accounting for many of the structural changes in sulfoxides and sulfones5. One is the Faience Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) theory8, while the other approach involves considerations of nonbonded ligand/ligand interactions9. 

The Lewis structures encountered in Chapter 2 are two-dimensional representations of the links between atoms—their connectivity—and except in the simplest cases do not depict the arrangement of atoms in space. The valence-shell electron-pair repulsion model (VSEPR model) extends Lewis s theory of bonding to account for molecular shapes by adding rules that account for bond angles. The model starts from the idea that because electrons repel one another, the shapes of simple molecules correspond to arrangements in which pairs of bonding electrons lie as far apart as possible. Specifically ... 

Example the n = 2 shell of Period 2 atoms, valence-shell electron-pair repulsion model (VSEPR model) A model for predicting the shapes of molecules, using the fact that electron pairs repel one another. 

Now that we know how to determine hybridization states, we need to know the geometry of each of the three hybridization states. One simple theory explains it all. This theory is called the valence shell electron pair repulsion theory (VSEPR). Stated simply, all orbitals containing electrons in the outermost shell (the valence shell) want to get as far apart from each other as possible. This one simple idea is all you need to predict the geometry around an atom. First, let s apply the theory to the three types of hybridized orbitals. 

The most stable shape for any molecule maximizes electron-nuclear attractive interactions while minimizing nuclear-nuclear and electron-electron repulsions. The distribution of electron density in each chemical bond is the result of attractions between the electrons and the nuclei. The distribution of chemical bonds relative to one another, on the other hand, is dictated by electrical repulsion between electrons in different bonds. The spatial arrangement of bonds must minimize electron-electron repulsion. This is accomplished by keeping chemical bonds as far apart as possible. The principle of minimizing electron-electron repulsion is called valence shell electron pair repulsion, usually abbreviated VSEPR. 

Having introduced methane and the tetrahedron, we now begin a systematic coverage of the VSEPR model and molecular shapes. The valence shell electron pair repulsion model assumes that electron-electron repulsion determines the arrangement of valence electrons around each inner atom. This is accomplished by positioning electron pairs as far apart as possible. Figure 9-12 shows the optimal arrangements for two electron pairs (linear),... 

The molecular geometry of a complex depends on the coordination number, which is the number of ligand atoms bonded to the metal. The most common coordination number is 6, and almost all metal complexes with coordination number 6 adopt octahedral geometry. This preferred geometry can be traced to the valence shell electron pair repulsion (VSEPR) model Introduced In Chapter 9. The ligands space themselves around the metal as far apart as possible, to minimize electron-electron repulsion. 

The other approach to molecular geometry is the valence shell electron-pair repulsion (VSEPR) theory. This theory holds that... 

Valence The highest-energy electrons in an atom, which an atom loses, gains, or shares in forming a chemical bond. Valence shell electron-pair repulsion (VSEPR) A procedure based on electron repulsion in molecules that enables chemists to predict approximate bond angles. 

Once computed on a 3D grid from a given ab initio wave function, the ELF function can be partitioned into an intuitive chemical scheme [30], Indeed, core regions, denoted C(X), can be determined for any atom, as well as valence regions associated to lone pairs, denoted V(X), and to chemical bonds (V(X,Y)). These ELF regions, the so-called basins (denoted 2), match closely the domains of Gillespie s VSEPR (Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion) model. Details about the ELF function and its applications can be found in a recent review paper [31],... 

Molecular Geometry The Valence Shell Electron-Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) Model... 

Due to the simplicity and the ability to explain the spectroscopic and excited state properties, the MO theory in addition to easy adaptability for modern computers has gained tremendous popularity among chemists. The concept of directed valence, based on the principle of maximum overlap and valence shell electron pair repulsion theory (VSEPR), has successfully explained the molecular geometries and bonding in polyatomic molecules. 

The VSEPR (Valence shell electron pair repulsion) Model... 

The most widely used qualitative model for the explanation of the shapes of molecules is the Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) model of Gillespie and Nyholm (25). The orbital correlation diagrams of Walsh (26) are also used for simple systems for which the qualitative form of the MOs may be deduced from symmetry considerations. Attempts have been made to prove that these two approaches are equivalent (27). But this is impossible since Walsh s Rules refer explicitly to (and only have meaning within) the MO model while the VSEPR method does not refer to (is not confined by) any explicitly-stated model of molecular electronic structure. Thus, any proof that the two approaches are equivalent can only prove, at best, that the two are equivalent at the MO level i.e. that Walsh s Rules are contained in the VSEPR model. Of course, the transformation to localised orbitals of an MO determinant provides a convenient picture of VSEPR rules but the VSEPR method itself depends not on the independent-particle model but on the possibility of separating the total electronic structure of a molecule into more or less autonomous electron pairs which interact as separate entities (28). The localised MO description is merely the simplest such separation the general case is our Eq. (6)... 

We now have three substances remaining methane, CH4, methyl fluoride, CH3F, and krypton difluoride, KrF2. We also have two types of intermolecular force remaining dipole-dipole forces and London forces. In order to match these substances and forces we must know which of the substances are polar and which are nonpolar. Polar substances utilize dipole-dipole forces, while nonpolar substances utilize London forces. To determine the polarity of each substance, we must draw a Lewis structure for the substance (Chapter 9) and use valence-shell electron pair repulsion (VSEPR) (Chapter 10). The Lewis structures for these substances are ... 

The shape of a molecule has quite a bit to do with its reactivity. This is especially true in biochemical processes, where slight changes in shape in three-dimensional space might make a certain molecule inactive or cause an adverse side effect. One way to predict the shape of molecules is the valence-shell electron-pair repulsion (VSEPR) theory. The... 

---