Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Viscoelasticity crosslinkers

Fig. 22. Nomialized pull-off energy measured for polyethylene-polyethylene contact measured using the SFA. (a) P versus rate of crack propagation for PE-PE contact. Change in the rate of separation does not seem to affect the measured pull-off force, (b) Normalized pull-off energy, Pn as a function of contact time for PE-PE contact. At shorter contact times, P does not significantly depend on contact time. However, as the surfaces remain in contact for long times, the pull-off energy increases with time. In seinicrystalline PE, the crystalline domains act as physical crosslinks for the relatively mobile amorphous domains. These amorphous domains can interdiffuse across the interface and thereby increase the adhesion of the interface. This time dependence of the adhesion strength is different from viscoelastic behavior in the sense that it is independent of rate of crack propagation. Fig. 22. Nomialized pull-off energy measured for polyethylene-polyethylene contact measured using the SFA. (a) P versus rate of crack propagation for PE-PE contact. Change in the rate of separation does not seem to affect the measured pull-off force, (b) Normalized pull-off energy, Pn as a function of contact time for PE-PE contact. At shorter contact times, P does not significantly depend on contact time. However, as the surfaces remain in contact for long times, the pull-off energy increases with time. In seinicrystalline PE, the crystalline domains act as physical crosslinks for the relatively mobile amorphous domains. These amorphous domains can interdiffuse across the interface and thereby increase the adhesion of the interface. This time dependence of the adhesion strength is different from viscoelastic behavior in the sense that it is independent of rate of crack propagation.
The treatment of blends as a two phase system opened up an interesting field of modifying the composite properties by the use of a (third component within the interface boundaries, which is termed as compatibilizers [1]. Such modifications are still being extended to the formation of microgel out of the interaction between the two blend partners having a reactive for functionalities. This type of interchain crosslinking does not require any compatibilizer to enhance the blend properties and also allows the blends to be reprocessed by further addition of a curative to achieve still further improved properties [3,4]. Such interchain crosslinking is believed to reduce the viscoelastic mismatch between the blend partners and, thus, facilitates smooth extrusion [5,6]. [Pg.611]

Chambon, F. and Winter, H.H. Linear viscoelasticity at the gel point of crosslinking PDMS with imbalanced stoichiometry, J. Rheol, 31, 683, 1987. [Pg.218]

Static leak-off experiments with borate-crosslinked and zirconate-cross-Unked hydroxypropylguar fluids showed practically the same leak-off coefficients [1883]. An investigation of the stress-sensitive properties showed that zirconate filter-cakes have viscoelastic properties, but borate filter-cakes are merely elastic. Noncrosslinked fluids show no filter-cake-type behavior for a large range of core permeabilities, but rather a viscous flow dependent on porous medium characteristics. [Pg.248]

The macroscopic long-time behavior of dense polymer liquids exhibits drastic changes if permanent cross-links are introduced in the system [75-77], Due to the presence of junctions the flow properties are suppressed and the viscoelastic liquid is transformed into a viscoelastic solid. This is contrary to the short-time behavior, which appears very similar in non-cross-linked and crosslinked polymer systems. [Pg.59]

The critical gel equation is expected to predict material functions in any small-strain viscoelastic experiment. The definition of small varies from material to material. Venkataraman and Winter [71] explored the strain limit for crosslinking polydimethylsiloxanes and found an upper shear strain of about 2, beyond which the gel started to rupture. For percolating suspensions and physical gels which form a stiff skeleton structure, this strain limit would be orders of magnitude smaller. [Pg.195]

During our early experiments on chemical gels, when first observing the intermediate state with the self-similar spectrum, Eq. 1-5, we simply called it viscoelastic transition . Then, numerous solvent extraction and swelling experiments on crosslinking samples showed that the viscoelastic transition marks the transition from a completely soluble state to an insoluble state. The sol-gel transition and the viscoelastic transition were found to be indistinguishable within the detection limit of our experiments. The most simple explanation for this observation was that both phenomena coincide, and that Eqs. 1-1 and 1-5 are indeed expressions of the LST. Modeling calculations of Winter and Cham-bon [6] also showed that Eq. 1-1 predicts an infinite viscosity (see Sect. 4) and a zero equilibrium modulus. This is consistent with what one would expect for a material at the gel point. [Pg.218]

Koike, T. Viscoelastic Behavior of Epoxy Resins Before Crosslinking. Vol. 148, pp. 139-188. [Pg.236]

At low concentrations, when uncharged polymers are dissolved in a solvent in which they do not crosslink or entangle, they possess a viscoelastic response through hydrodynamic and entropic effects. We can begin by considering an isolated chain in its quiescent state. The chain will be in constant motion. In the absence of any specific interactions, the chain will evolve to its maximum entropy state. We can represent the chain as N links or submolecules each with a length b. These links are formed from a few monomer units of the chain. The root mean square end-to-end length of the chain is... [Pg.187]

The understanding of the temperature and conversion dependence of the crosslinking kinetics is one of the prerequisites for understanding the changes in viscosity and viscoelastic properties as a function of reaction time and reaction temperature ( ). Three main factors determine these relations the reaction kinetics determined by temperature and conversion, the changes in structure determined primarily by conversion and the changes in Tg determined primarily also by conversion. [Pg.24]

A unified approach to the glass transition, viscoelastic response and yield behavior of crosslinking systems is presented by extending our statistical mechanical theory of physical aging. We have (1) explained the transition of a WLF dependence to an Arrhenius temperature dependence of the relaxation time in the vicinity of Tg, (2) derived the empirical Nielson equation for Tg, and (3) determined the Chasset and Thirion exponent (m) as a function of cross-link density instead of as a constant reported by others. In addition, the effect of crosslinks on yield stress is analyzed and compared with other kinetic effects — physical aging and strain rate. [Pg.124]

The time and temperature dependent properties of crosslinked polymers including epoxy resins (1-3) and rubber networks (4-7) have been studied in the past. Crosslinking has a strong effect on the glass transition temperature (Tg), on viscoelastic response, and on plastic deformation. Although experimental observations and empirical expressions have been made and proposed, respectively, progress has been slow in understanding the nonequilibrium mechanisms responsible for the time dependent behavior. [Pg.124]

Foams were prepared from blends of EVA and ethylene-styrene interpolymers having styrene contents ranging from 30 to 73 wt.% and Tgs ranging from -2 to 33C, in the presence of various amounts of dicumyl peroxide and their viscoelastic and mechanical properties investigated. The effects of styrene content and peroxide concentration on the morphology, degree of crosslinking and expansion ratio of the foams were assessed as was the influence of the type of ethylene-styrene interpolymer on the Tg of the foams. It was found that the Tg of the blends could be tailored by selection of the appropriate interpolymer. 19 refs. [Pg.28]


See other pages where Viscoelasticity crosslinkers is mentioned: [Pg.455]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.693]    [Pg.694]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.710]    [Pg.715]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.268]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.383 , Pg.384 ]




SEARCH



Effect of Crosslink Density on Elastic and Viscoelastic Properties

© 2024 chempedia.info