Vibrations effective Hamiltonian

We introduce the dimensionless bending coordinates qr = t/XrPr anti qc = tAcPc ith Xt = (kT -r) = PrOir, Xc = sJ kcPc) = Pc nc. where cor and fOc are the harmonic frequencies for pure trans- and cis-bending vibrations, respectively. After integrating over 0, we obtain the effective Hamiltonian H = Ho + H, which is employed in the perturbative handling of the R-T effect and the spin-orbit coupling. Its zeroth-order pait is of the foim... 

Then, there are model Hamiltonians. Effectively a model Hamiltonian includes only some effects, in order to focus on those effects. It is generally simpler than the true full Coulomb Hamiltonian, but is made that way to focus on a particular aspect, be it magnetization, Coulomb interaction, diffusion, phase transitions, etc. A good example is the set of model Hamiltonians used to describe the IETS experiment and (more generally) vibronic and vibrational effects in transport junctions. Special models are also used to deal with chirality in molecular transport junctions [42, 43], as well as optical excitation, Raman excitation [44], spin dynamics, and other aspects that go well beyond the simple transport phenomena associated with these systems. 

The effective hamiltonian in formula 29 incorporates approximations that we here consider. Apart from a term V"(R) that originates in nonadiabatic effects [67] beyond those taken into account through the rotational and vibrational g factors, other contributions arise that become amalgamated into that term. Replacement of nuclear masses by atomic masses within factors in terms for kinetic energy for motion both along and perpendicular to the internuclear axis yields a term of this form for the atomic reduced mass. 

That effective hamiltonian according to formula 29, with neglect of W"(R), appears to be the most comprehensive and practical currently available for spectral reduction when one seeks to take into account all three principal extramechanical terms, namely radial functions for rotational and vibrational g factors and adiabatic corrections. The form of this effective hamiltonian differs slightly from that used by van Vleck [9], who failed to recognise a connection between the electronic contribution to the rotational g factor and rotational nonadiabatic terms [150,56]. There exists nevertheless a clear evolution from the advance in van Vleck s [9] elaboration of Dunham s [5] innovative derivation of vibration-rotational energies into the present effective hamiltonian in formula 29 through the work of Herman [60,66]. The notation g for two radial functions pertaining to extra-mechanical effects in formula 29 alludes to that connection between... 

In our discussion the usual Born-Oppenheimer (BO) approximation will be employed. This means that we assume a standard partition of the effective Hamiltonian into an electronic and a nuclear part, as well as the factorization of the solute wavefunction into an electronic and a nuclear component. As will be clear soon, the corresponding electronic problem is the main source of specificities of QM continuum models, due to the nonlinearity of the effective electronic Hamiltonian of the solute. The QM nuclear problem, whose solution gives information on solvent effects on the nuclear structure (geometry) and properties, has less specific aspects, with respect the case of the isolated molecules. In fact, once the proper potential energy surfaces are obtained from the solution of the electronic problem, such a problem can be solved using the standard methods and approximations (mechanical harmonicity, and anharmonicity of various order) used for isolated molecules. The QM nuclear problem is mainly connected with the vibrational properties of the nuclei and the corresponding spectroscopic observables, and it will be considered in more detail in the contributions in the book dedicated to the vibrational spectroscopies (IR/Raman). This contribution will be focused on the QM electronic problem. 

The vibration-rotation hamiltonian of a polyatomic molecule is more complicated than that of a diatomic molecule, both because of the increased number of co-ordinates, and because of the presence of Coriolis terms which are absent from the diatomic hamiltonian. These differences lead to many more terms in the formulae for a and x values obtained from the contact transformation, and they also lead to various kinds of vibrational and rotational resonance situations in which two or more vibrational levels are separated by so small an energy that interaction terms in the hamiltonian between these levels cannot easily be handled by perturbation theory. It is then necessary to obtain an effective hamiltonian over these two or more vibrational levels, and to use special techniques to relate the coefficients in this hamiltonian to the observed spectrum. 

Contact Transformation for the Effective Hamiltonian.—The vibration-rotation hamiltonian of a polyatomic molecule, expressed in terms of normal co-ordinates, has been discussed in particular by Wilson, Decius, and Cross,24 and by Watson.27- 28 It is given by the following expression for a non-linearf polyatomic molecule, to be compared with equation (17) for a diatomic molecule ... 

The perturbation calculation may also be described as a contact transformation. The original hamiltonian is transformed to a new effective hamiltonian which has the same eigenvalues but different eigenfunctions, to some carefully chosen order of magnitude. This contact transformation of the vibration-rotation hamiltonian was originally studied by Nielsen and co-workers. >33... 

It is instructive to consider two of the formulae for the spectroscopic constants in more detail, and for this we choose — and xrs for an asymmetric top, these being respectively the coefficients of (vT + )J, the vibrational dependence of the rotational constant, and (vr + i)(fs + i), the vibrational anharmonic constant quadratic in the vibrational quantum numbers. As for diatomic molecules these two types of spectroscopic constant provide the most important source of information on cubic and quartic anharmonicity, respectively. The formulae obtained from the perturbation treatment for these two coefficients in the effective hamiltonian are as follows ... 

The choice of the effective Hamiltonian is often far from straightforward indeed we have devoted a whole chapter to this subject (chapter 7). In this section we give a gentle introduction to the problems involved, and show that the definition of a particular molecular parameter is not always simple. The problem we face is not difficult to understand. We are usually concerned with the sub-structure of one or two rotational levels at most, and we aim to determine the values of the important parameters relating to those levels. However, these parameters may involve the participation of other vibrational and electronic states. We do not want an effective Hamiltonian which refers to other electronic states explicitly, because it would be very large, cumbersome and essentially unusable. We want to analyse our spectrum with an effective Hamiltonian involving only the quantum numbers that arise directly in the spectrum. The effects of all other states, and their quantum numbers, are to be absorbed into the definition and values of the molecular parameters . The way in which we do this is outlined briefly here, and thoroughly in chapter 7. 

We shall see later how, with the appropriate expressions for the magnetic vector potentials, the effects of an external magnetic vector potentials, the effects of an external magnetic field can be introduced into the vibration rotation Hamiltonian. 

In this chapter we introduce and derive the effective Hamiltonian for a diatomic molecule. The effective Hamiltonian operates only within the levels (rotational, spin and hyperfine) of a single vibrational level of the particular electronic state of interest. It is derived from the Ml Hamiltonian described in the previous chapters by absorbing the effects of off-diagonal matrix elements, which link the vibronic level of interest to other vibrational and electronic states, by a perturbation procedure. It has the same eigenvalues as the Ml Hamiltonian, at least to within some prescribed accuracy. 

It is well known from the Bom-Oppenheimer separation [1] that the pattern of energy levels for a typical diatomic molecule consists first of widely separated electronic states (A eiec 20000 cm-1). Each of these states then supports a set of more closely spaced vibrational levels (AEvib 1000 cm-1). Each of these vibrational levels in turn is spanned by closely spaced rotational levels ( A Emt 1 cm-1) and, in the case of open shell molecules, by fine and hyperfine states (A Efs 100 cm-1 and AEhts 0.01 cm-1). The objective is to construct an effective Hamiltonian which is capable of describing the detailed energy levels of the molecule in a single vibrational level of a particular electronic state. It is usual to derive this Hamiltonian in two stages because of the different nature of the electronic and nuclear coordinates. In the first step, which we describe in the present section, we derive a Hamiltonian which acts on all the vibrational states of a single electronic state. The operators thus remain explicitly dependent on the vibrational coordinate R (the intemuclear separation). In the second step, described in section 7.55, we remove the effects of terms in this intermediate Hamiltonian which couple different vibrational levels. The result is an effective Hamiltonian for each vibronic state. 

We shall not go through the details of the derivations of the other terms in table 7.1. Suffice it to say that they are similar to that described for the parameter ys(R). We shall write down their operator form once we have dealt with the next stage of the development of the effective Hamiltonian, that of vibrational averaging. 

---