Versus density

Solid-Fluid Equilibria The phase diagrams of binai y mixtures in which the heavier component (tne solute) is normally a solid at the critical temperature of the light component (the solvent) include solid-liquid-vapor (SLV) cui ves which may or may not intersect the LV critical cui ve. The solubility of the solid is vei y sensitive to pressure and temperature in compressible regions where the solvent s density and solubility parameter are highly variable. In contrast, plots of the log of the solubility versus density at constant temperature exhibit fairly simple linear behavior. 

Figure 4.19. Shock pressure versus density Hugoniot states for initially porous quartz. Density of starting material is indicated on various curves. Porous properties of stishovite are represented by curves with 1.75, 2.13, and 2.65 Mg/m, initial density, whereas coesitelike properties are represented by 0.2-0.8 Mg/m curves (after Simakov and Trunin (1990)).

Fig. 5.20. Full width of nitrogen Q-branch CARS spectra measured at 295 K versus densities (squares) and calculated width using the MEG law (circles) [14]. Shown also are the error bar and the width measured in liquid nitrogen (triangle), (a) Density range up to 700 amagat. (b) Density range up to 100 amagat showing part of Fig. 5.20(a) in more detail...

Gilb, S., Weis, P., Furche, F., Ahlrichs, R. and Kappes, M.M. (2002) Structures of small gold cluster cations (Au u< 14) Ion mobility measurements versus density functional calculations. Journal of Chemical Physics, 116, 4094—4101. 

There is some doubt over the location of the boundary separating Groups A and C. The particle size versus density relationship proposed by Geldart (1973) may not be sufficient to define these regions. For example, refer to Geldart et al. (1984). 

Figure 8 Compressibility factor P/fiksT versus density p = pa3 of the hard-sphere system as calculated from both free-volume information (Eq. [8]) and the collision rate measured in molecular dynamics simulations. The empirically successful Camahan-Starling84 equation of state for the hard-sphere fluid is also shown for comparison. (Adapted from Ref. 71).

Figure 1. Pressure versus density for a variety of EoS taken from [2] where explanation of...

The basic features of equations of state are not complicated when they are expressed as PV/RT versus density. Figure 3 is a sample plot for methanol. These curves are characteristic of all fluids, and equations of state only differ in their ability to accurately predict these curves. The actual curves are relatively simple and they change only slightly from one material to another for this reason, simple equations of state such as the Redlich-Kwong equation have been about as successful as the BWR equation. The simplicity of the actual curves is often hidden because the data are not usually plotted as PV/RT versus density. More often the data are plotted as PV/RT versus pressure shown in Figure 4, or pressure versus volume shown in Figure 5. Both of these plots obscure the real simplicity shown in Figure 3. 

Polyethylenes can be classified versus density and molecular weight ... 

Figure 4.6. Tensile strength versus density for PE foam example...

Figure 4.14. Tensile strength examples versus density of Polypropylene foams Examples of applications...

Figure 4.44 shows examples of specific modulus (modulus/density ratio) versus density of polystyrene foams. 

Figure 6.8 plots the reinforcement ratios for short glass fibre reinforced polyamide (PA-GF) versus neat polyamide for six important characteristics calculated versus density and material cost. These characteristics are tensile strength, tensile and flexural modulus, impact strength, HDT A and B. 

For example, the flexural modulus (FMw) computed versus density (d) is ... 

Figure 6.13. Sandwich structure examples flexural strength versus density...

Fig 3-2, p 47 gives velocity versus density of the above expls, while Fig 3.3 deals with velocity vs diameter for the same expls. Both of these Figs are reproduced here as Figs 1 2 under DETONATION VELOCITY-CHARGE DIAMETER AND DENSITY RELATIONSHIPS. These curves were obtd at large enough.diameters to ensure ideal deton... 

Figure 8.9 Materials selection chart of strength versus density. Reprinted, by permission, from M. F. Ashby, Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, p. 39, 2nd ed. Copyright 1999 by Michael F. Ashby.

That is, ttcr is directly proportional to K c/cry) since oh is a fraction of Oy. Thus, the larger the value of acr, the more attractive is the material, since cracks can be easily detected without the use of sophisticated equipment. The Ashby plot of fracture toughness versus density (Figure 8.10) indicates that of the three classes of materials selected with Criterion 1, only the engineering composites and engineering alloys provide suitable possibilities for Criterion 2. Again, of the alloys, titanium, steel, nickel, and copper alloys are the best here. 

A maximum is found in the ratio of endo- to exo-products versus, density in the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclopentadiene and methyl acrylate in supercritical carbon dioxide (Chfford et al 1997). 

This requirement is fulfilled in gas chromatography (GC), where nitrogen or helium is used as the carrier gas. The low density of gases correlates with their high diffusion coefficients, and therefore in GC fast separations at high flow rates can be achieved when compared with LC. In Figure 7.2.1, the diffusion coefficient versus density diagram shows the areas occupied by the mobile phases in HPLC and GC. 

Figure 7.2.1 Diffusion coefficient versus density diagram...

The feature of chemotropicity allows analysis of the vertical distribution of chemical structure versus pressure and versus density and comparison of the results obtained in the different expeditions. In Fig. 2 we used both the scales to present the typical distribution of the chemical parameters. Here we will describe these typical distribution features of the concrete parameters. 

Fig. 2 Vertical distribution of temperature (T), salinity (S), dissolved oxygen (02), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), dissolved manganese (Mn diss), nitrate (NO3), nitrite (NO2), ammonia (NH4), phosphate (P04), silicate (Si), pH (pH), total alkalinity (Aik), methane (CH4), organic phosphorus (Porg), organic nitrogen (Norg), and urea (Urea), at a station near Gelendzhik (St. 2618, September, 2006). Concentrations of chemical parameters are in aM. Distributions are plotted versus depth (m) at the top and versus density (agy kg nr3) at the bottom...

---