Version space

Example 3-8 The hypothesis space is often supposed to be constrained by a conceptual bias and a syntactic bias an acceptable hypothesis satisfies both biases. A hypothesis is characteristic for a set of examples iff it is satisfied by all the positive examples of A hypothesis is discriminant for iff its negation is satisfied by all the negative examples of . An acceptable hypothesis is admissible consistent) for iff it is characteristic for E and discriminant for The version space for a set of examples is the set of all admissible hypotheses (versions) for . 

Example 3-10 Version spaces are of a size exponential in the size of the basis set, not to mention the syntactic bias. Fortunately, well-formed version spaces (for instance, when the basis set is finite) have the interesting property that they are indeed bound by their boundary sets, which provides for an admissibility check that is independent of the examples. See below for an application of this property. 

The data-driven approach features incremental learning, with (by definition) an iteration over the set of given examples, where each presentation of an example leads to an update of the current hypothesis (set) wrt that example. There are three main strategies for reducing the version space to a hypothesis (set) that is admissible for L ... 

These three strategies differ by the representative subset of the version space they build. Ultimately, the minimal hypotheses of the inferred hypothesis (set) are retained, because they are satisfied by the potentially smallest possible set of examples unrelated to the intended concept. The data-driven approach has a low tolerance to noise. 

The inferred hypotheses are collected into a hopefully representative subset of the version space. The approximation-driven approach has some tolerance to noise. 

The non-incremental, stepwise synthesis strategy presented in Section 7.3.2 features the same idea as the incremental version spaces strategy of [Mitchell 81], namely simultaneous bottom-up and top-down search, but is after all totally different from it. 

The version space learning methodology has been used to learn reaction transforms from preclassified reactions. " The overall goal of such learning is the compilation of knowledge bases to support synthesis planning and reaction prediction. 

Figure 4 The version space delimits the possible set of hypotheses...

The LMTO method [58, 79] can be considered to be the linear version of the KKR teclmique. According to official LMTO historians, the method has now reached its third generation [79] the first starting with Andersen in 1975 [58], the second connnonly known as TB-LMTO. In the LMTO approach, the wavefimction is expanded in a basis of so-called muffin-tin orbitals. These orbitals are adapted to the potential by constmcting them from solutions of the radial Scln-ddinger equation so as to fomi a minimal basis set. Interstitial properties are represented by Hankel fiinctions, which means that, in contrast to the LAPW teclmique, the orbitals are localized in real space. The small basis set makes the method fast computationally, yet at the same time it restricts the accuracy. The localization of the basis fiinctions diminishes the quality of the description of the wavefimction in die interstitial region. 

The earliest ball and stick models were exactly that wooden balls in which holes were drilled to ac commodate dowels that connected the atoms Plastic versions including relatively inexpensive student sets became available in the 1960s and proved to be a valuable learning aid Precisely scaled stainless steel framework and plastic space filling models although relatively expensive were standard equipment in most research laboratories... 

A related concept is that space velocity, which is a ratio of a flow rate at STP (usually 60°F, 1 atm) to the size of the reactor. The most common versions in typical units are ... 

Recently, MD constrained to torsion angle space [torsion angle dynamics (TAD)] was introduced to refinement calculations [33,57,58]. Earlier versions of the equations of... 

All pictorial representations of molecules are simplified versions of our current model of real molecules, which are quantum mechanical, probabilistic collections of atoms as both particles and waves. These are difficult to illustrate. Therefore we use different types of simplified representations, including space-filling models ball-and-stick models, where atoms are spheres and bonds are sticks and models that illustrate surface properties. The most detailed representation is the ball-and-stick model. However, a model of a protein structure where all atoms are displayed is confusing because of the sheer amount of information present (Figure 2.9a). 

Sponsor Argonne National Lab, Environmental Assessment Division, Atmospheric Science Section, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Argonne, IL 60439. Developer University of Illinois, Dept, of Mechanical Engineering, 1206 W. Green, Urbana, IL 61801. Custodians D.F. Brown University of lUinois, Dept, of Mechanical Engineering, 1206 W. Green, Urbana IL 61801. Computer It runs on a 486, Pentium PC, or any workstation. The deterministic version runs (slowly) on a 386. The stochastic version of the code was originally written for a Sun Workstation. The PC version requires at least a 486, 33 MHz machine with a minimum of 10 MB of free hard disk space. Cost None ... 

The PC version runs comparatively slow on large problems. FIRAC can perform lumped parameter/control volume-type analysis but is limited in detailed multidimensional modeling of a room or gaa dome space. Diffusion and turbulence within a control volume is not modeled. Multi-gas species are not included in the equations of state. 

---