Variational CCD

To investigate whether this is due to limitations of the CCD wave function, or the way in which the CCD energy and amplitudes are conventionally obtained, we have recently performed variational CCD calculations (14). Variational CCD calculations are a restricted form of full configuration interaction (with factorial cost), because the energy expectation value includes contributions from all orbital replacements as high as the number of electrons ... 

As an example of the results that are obtained in this way. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the potential curves obtained for homolytically dissociating the two single bonds in the water molecule by full Cl, conventional CCD, and variational CCD, in two basis sets. 

Figure L Variational CCD (VCCD), conventional CCD, and full Cl (FCI) calculations on the double dissociation ofH20, in the STO-3G basis. The experimental bond angle (104.5 ) and FCI Brueckner orbitals were used.

There are two principal conclusions that can be drawn from these results While conventional CCD fails dramatically, the variational CCD calculations are well-behaved at long bond-lengths. The difficulties with conventional CCD for this 4 active electron problem are clearly a result of... 

The errors associated with variational CCD are significantly larger in the double zeta basis (Fig. 2) than in die minimal basis (Fig. 1). This single trial wave function can do a near quantitatively accurate job of approximating the valence space (static) correlation (which is all that is present in the STO-3G basis), but is less successful in reproducing both static and dynamic correlation in the larger DZ basis. 

How might we approximate the variational CCD approach discussed above, without incurring its factorial computational cost Let us briefly re-examine the conventional CCD energy ansatz as a prelude to discussing how we have chosen to go beyond it. In conventional CC theory the equations that determine the doubles amplitudes can be obtained by minimizing the following functional ... 

Figure 3. Calculations of the triple bond dissociation ofN2 in the STO-3G basis, using full Cl, conventional CCD, variational CCD, and quadratic CCD,...

Coupled cluster calculations give variational energies as long as the excitations are included successively. Thus, CCSD is variational, but CCD is not. CCD still tends to be a bit more accurate than CID. 

Note The speed of the motor ean be varied by vai-ying the frequeney alone but this docs not provide satisfactory performance, A variation in frequeney causes an inverse variation in the flux, for the same system voltage. The strength of magnetic field, p, develops, the torque and moves the rotor, but at lower speeds. / would be reduced, which would raise 0 , and lead the magnetic circuit to saturation. For higher s )ccds, / would be r.nised, but that would reduee which would adversely diminish the torque. Hence frequency variation alone is not recommended practice for speed control. The recommended practiee is to keep V/fas constant, to maintain the motor s vital operatin.c parameters, i.e. its torque and 0 ,. within acceptable limits. 

Boron implant with laser anneal. Boron atoms are accelerated into the backside of the CCD, replacing about 1 of 10,000 silicon atoms with a boron atom. The boron atoms create a net negative charge that push photoelectrons to the front surface. However, the boron implant creates defects in the lattice structure, so a laser is used to melt a thin layer (100 nm) of the silicon. As the silicon resolidihes, the crystal structure returns with some boron atoms in place of silicon atoms. This works well, except for blue/UV photons whose penetration depth is shorter than the depth of the boron implant. Variations in implant depth cause spatial QE variations, which can be seen in narrow bandpass, blue/UV, flat fields. This process is used by E2V, MIT/LL and Samoff. 

The corrections and calibration of filterFRET differ significantly for CCD microscopes and confocal microscopes. This is because in confocal experiments, channel sensitivities are adjusted at will by the experimenter, and because relative excitation intensities show intended-as well as unintended variations (adjustments and drift, respectively). Confocal filterFRET therefore requires frequent, if not in-line, recalibration however, if properly streamlined this should not take more than 15 min a day. It also slightly complicates the mathematical framework, as compared to CCD imaging filterFRET. We aimed to arrive at a comprehensive theory that is equally applicable to both imaging modes. We also proposed mathematical jargon that is a compromise between the widely differing terminologies used in the various publications on this topic. 

It is just a half-century ago that the concept of real abundance variations became well-established. It is less that 50 years since the famous B2FH paper was published. Quantitative CCD-based spectroscopy is only some 20 years old, while quantitative multi-object spectroscopy has really begun only in the last decade. These rapid observational advances were enabled by impressive advances in instrumentation, combined with increasing software power and complexity. In parallel, significant advances in stellar atmospheric modelling, and the requisite atomic and molecular data, have allowed analyses of superb precision for large numbers of stars. 

In the optimized orbitals CCD (00-CCD or OD) model, the orbitals are optimized variationally to minimize the total energy of the 00-CCD wavefunction. This allows one to drop single excitations from the wavefunction. Conceptually, 00-CCD is very similar to the Brueckner CCD (B-CCD) method. Both 00-CCD and B-CCD perform similarly to CCSD in most cases. 

Figure 12.1 A schematic representation of a SAXS experiment. The X-ray beam is incident from the left and scatters from die sample. A detector, located to the right of the sample, records the angular variation of intensity of scattered X-rays. The shape of this scattering profile contains information about die global structural features of the molecules in the sample. More details about the beamline components, as well as the process for converting CCD images into one dimensional curves of intensity versus angle, can be found elsewhere in this volume (Chapter 19).

The Chandra Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) is an array of charged coupled devices (CCD s). This instrument is especially useful because it can simultaneously make X-ray images, and at the same time, accurately measure the energy of each incoming X-ray. It is the instrument of choice for studying temperature and abundance variations across extended X-ray sources. 

---