Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Vapor flux rate

The simulated weather changes that produced the variations in surface vapor flux rate shown in Figure 4.11 began with a soil sample with about 50% pore moisture saturation in a chamber under an artificial atmosphere. A quantity of DNT was introduced beneath the surface, at a depth typical of a landmine, about 3.5 cm. The atmosphere in the chamber was controlled to 50% relative... [Pg.86]

Editor This discussion brings to mind the question of how the animals sniff in the molecules. You have addressed this question from the point of view of field practice more than physiology, which may help us understand how better to use electronic systems. You indicated that recent data from Norway18 indicates that the dogs more often make correct identification of explosives when the humidity is low, but that the temperature seems to have no effect. How does this compare with the greater explosive vapor flux rates measured after rain, as discussed in Chapter 4 and Chapter 7 ... [Pg.184]

Figure 1.30. Vapor flux rate for the transport through the MPL and GDL layers plotted against the water production. Figure 1.30. Vapor flux rate for the transport through the MPL and GDL layers plotted against the water production.
Moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR), for VDC copolymers, 25 709-710 Molality, 15 751 Molar absorptivity, 14 237 Molar flux, 15 678 Molar Gibbs energy, 24 660, 662 Molarity, 15 751... [Pg.594]

Cyclone velocities, vapor and solids loadings, and mass flux rates should be periodically reviewed to ensure acceptable cyclone operation. [Pg.107]

For this reason, additional studies on carbon tetrachloride flux rates into and out of surface water, as well as refined quantitative estimates of aquatic fate processes would be valuable. The chemical is expected to evaporate rapidly from soil due to its high vapor pressure and may migrate into groundwater due to its low soil adsorption coefficient. No data are available on biodegradation in soil. Additional studies to determine degradation rates and the extent to which adsorption has occurred would be useful. These data are also useful in evaluating the impact of carbon tetrachloride leaching from hazardous waste sites. [Pg.127]

Failing to incorporate soil-gas advection induced by barometric pumping into gas-phase subsurface transport models may, under certain conditions, under predict contaminant flux to the atmosphere. As previously described, Smith et al. (1996) compared TCE vapor fluxes measured with a chamber device to TCE in groundwater being removed by a pump-and-treat system and discharge into a surface-water receiving body at the same site. These researchers found VOC removal rates by flux to the atmosphere comparable in magnitude to both of the other attenuation pathways. [Pg.333]

A gravimetric method is often used for the measurement of water vapor permeability. The water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) according to this method is the amount of water vapor in g that permeates in 24 hours under standard test conditions (temperature, air relative humidity, water vapor sorbant) through aim2 sample surface area. The method measure a flux and not a permeability coefficient. [Pg.262]

To determine the effect of orifice size on vapor pressure, five different orifices were used to measure the effusion rates at 25 °C. of one compound, 2-chlorcMt-aminopyrimidine. Carson, Cooper, and Stranks (6) have shown that the net rate of effusion is directly proportional to the flux (rate of effusion per unit area) if other factors are constant. That is, a graph of... [Pg.60]

A. If the average water vapor flux density of the leaves is 1 mmol m-2 s-1, what is the transpiration rate of the tree in m3 s-1 ... [Pg.502]

As downward miscella flow reaches the miscella flux rate, the material/screen interface reaches its maximum flow rate and begins restricting the flow of miscella. All void spaces between the oleaginous material particles fill with miscella as the solvent vapors are pushed out of the top of the material bed. Eventually, the entire material bed becomes immersed in miscella with no void spaces. At this point, miscella breaks through the top of the miscella bed and forms a pool. This phenomenon is often referred to as flooding the material bed. Once the material bed is flooded, no additional rate of flow will pass down through the material bed. [Pg.2493]

The saturated water vapor concentration C was calculated from the temperature at each position. The distribution of the water vapor flux was then calculated using the water vapor diffusion coefficient D. Finally, we compared fc and fn and examined the relationship between the water vapor flux and the crystal growth rate. [Pg.284]

Figure 4 Relationship betw een the water vapor fluxes and the crystal growth rate in each layer. Solid circle is the calculated water vapor flux. Open circle is the measured water vapor flux. Columns are the average growth rate of each layer. Figure 4 Relationship betw een the water vapor fluxes and the crystal growth rate in each layer. Solid circle is the calculated water vapor flux. Open circle is the measured water vapor flux. Columns are the average growth rate of each layer.
The water vapor flux seems to affect significantly the growth rate of depth hoar snow. It seemed that water vapor transportation also caused a density change in snow. The initial and final density of each layer is illustrated in Figure 6. Before and after the experiment, the lost mass was only 0.5 %. The density of layer I (warmest) decreased. [Pg.285]

Figure 5 Re-expressed relationships between the water vapor flux and the growth rate seen in Figure 4. Previous result reported in Kamata et al (1999) was also shown to examine the density dependence. Figure 5 Re-expressed relationships between the water vapor flux and the growth rate seen in Figure 4. Previous result reported in Kamata et al (1999) was also shown to examine the density dependence.
Vapor permeation is often a preferred technique to pervaporation, and liquid feeds are often evaporated, especially, to run the vapor permeation process. The evaporator is typically operated under pressure, giving a vapor feed at the maximum temperature and flux rate consistent with membrane stability. The advantages are a simpler plant and more reliable operation, because both dissolved and suspended solids are removed in the evaporator and cannot damage the membranes. The disadvantage is the extra energy required to evaporate the complete feed (Fig. 5). [Pg.2033]

With the advent of process simulation packages, modeling of pervaporation and vapor permeation processes in a user added subroutine allows these unit processes to be included in overall separation schemes right from the conceptual stage. This enables many different combinations of pervaporation, for example, distillation to be studied and the optimum operating parameters for the preferred configuration to be selected very quickly. Such parameters include membrane feed temperature, which strongly influences the flux rate and, therefore. [Pg.2039]


See other pages where Vapor flux rate is mentioned: [Pg.198]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.2054]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.632]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.1812]    [Pg.2494]    [Pg.3362]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.1051]    [Pg.1844]    [Pg.2219]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.1059]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.184 ]




SEARCH



Flux rate

Vaporization rate

© 2024 chempedia.info