Validation error

There is no restriction in the derivation of this relationship that would prevent its extension to cases where. YelR", EA-e9Tx", Y and Ae9 m, and Ae9lm n with m n. Then, Eye91mx" and equation (4.2.31) is still valid. Error propagation is achieved by replacing the population parameters by the value estimated by sampling, e.g., x for the sample mean... 

Figure 12.26 Plot of the calibration error (RMSEE) and the validation error (RMSEP) as a function of the number of latent variables, for the case where 63 of the styrene-butadiene copolymer samples were selected for calibration, and the remaining seven samples were used for validation.

When the GA algorithm is terminated, one is presented with one or more variable subsets, along with the cross-validation error associated with each subset. At this point, there are several ways in which these results could be used to select the final subset of variables. One could select the union or the intersection of the variables that appear in all of these subsets, or simply the subset that generated the lowest cross-vahdation error. One could also use prior knowledge regarding the stability or rehabihty of certain variables to make the final selection. However, it should be noted that the GA algorithm starts with a randomly-selected set of variable subsets, and thus will generate different results with the identical x and y data when run more than once. As a result, it is often useful to run the GA several times on the same data, in order to obtain a consensus on the selection of useful variables. 

Figure 5.6 Example of a control chart depicting the training and validation errors as a function of learning epochs (cycles). The vertical line denotes the compromise between the modelling and prediction abilities. 

In order to characterise wine samples into the mentioned four classes, a supervised pattern recognition method (LDA) was applied. The results obtained gave 100% correct classification for the three classes (Barbera Oltrepo, Barbera Piemonte and Barbera Alba) and only one Barbera Asti sample was not correctly classified (cross-validation error rate 1.89%). 

Calculating statistically valid error bars after a small number N of measurements (for example, six measurement of the concentration) is an important application of statistics. Sometimes we can estimate the error in each measurement based on our knowledge of the equipment used, but more often the sources of error are so numerous that the best estimate is based on the spread of the values we measure. 

With a small number of measurements, calculating valid error bars requires a more complex analysis than the one given in Section 4.3. The mean is calculated the same way, but instead of calculating the root-mean-squared deviation a, we calculate the variance s ... 

For acenaphthylene using PLS1, the cross-validated error is presented in Fig. 18. An immediate difference between autoprediction and cross-validation is evident. In the former case the data will always be better modelled as more components are employed in the calculation, so the error will always reduce (with occasional rare exceptions in the case of 1 Hcai). Flowever, cross-validated errors normally reach a minimum as the correct number of components are found and then increase afterwards. This is because later components really represent noise and not systematic information in the data. 

If, however, we use dataset B as the training set and dataset A as the test set, a very different story emerges as shown in Fig. 20 for acenaphthylene. The autopredictive and cross-validation errors are very similar to those obtained for dataset A the value... 

Confusion of model selection with model assessment. If one chooses the model with the lowest cross-validated error among competing models, that error is not a valid estimate of the prediction error of that model (selection bias). 

Table 4.8 Calculation of cross-validated error for sample 1 ...

The following steps are used to determine cross-validation errors for PCR. 

Decide how many PCs are in the model, which determines the size of the matrices. Normally the procedure is repeated using successively more PCs, and a cross-validation error is obtained each time. 

Perform PLS1 cross-validation on the c values for the first eight components and plot a graph of cross-validated error against component number. 

Chemistry is an experimental science in which every qnantitative measnrement is subject to some degree of error. We can seek to reduce error by carrying out additional measurements or by changing our experimental apparatus, but we can never eliminate error altogether. It is important, therefore, to be able to assess the results of an experiment quantitatively to establish the limits of the experiment s validity. Errors are of two types random (lack of precision) and systematic (lack of accuracy). 

Even with blank corrections, several factors can cause the basic assumption of the external standard method to break down. Matrix effects due to extraneous species in the sample that are not present in the standards or blank can cause the same analyte concentrations in the sample and standards to give different responses. Differences in experimental variables at the times at which blank, sample, and standard are measured can also invalidate the established calibration function. Even when the basic assumption is valid, errors can still occur owing to contamination during the sampling or sample preparation steps. 

The recommendation here is to use SMILES to store molecular structure itself. If other features of the molecule or atoms need to be stored, other data types and columns can be added to the row describing the molecule. It is the "SQL way" to not encode a lot of information into one data type. When using a molfile as the structural data type, too much data is encoded in a single data type. The individual data items must be parsed and validated. Errors creep into the data, due to missing, extra, or invalid portions of the molfile. Ways of storing atomic coordinates, atom types, and molecular properties are discussed Chapter 11. 

For the GA applications described in this chapter the fitness function is set to be the cross-validation error from PLS on a data set using the selected variables dictated by the binary string (i.e. the hypothesis is identical to the set of selected variables). 

---