Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

USEPA ECOTOX database

The evaluation for aquatic toxicity on daphnids and fish is reported in Tables 12 and 13. Bold values indicate that compounds are out of the model applicability domain (ECOSAR) or that the prediction is not reliable. ECOSAR and ToxSuite are able to predict all the selected compounds while T.E.S.T. fails in prediction for the daphnia toxicity of perfluorinated compounds (PFOS and PFOA). Tables 12 and 13 include also a limited number of experimental results provided by the model training dataset (some data are extracted from USEPA Ecotox database). Predicted results are in agreement for five compounds only (2, 3, 5, 13 and 14) for both endpoints while the predictions for the other compounds are highly variable. [Pg.200]

Tier 2 PRA process involved developing environmental exposure data and chronic toxicity data distributions for individual POPs. The mean concentrations of POPs in local marine water measured at various locations were used as exposure data in the construction of the exposure distribution. The chronic toxicity data distribution was established based on published international acute toxicity data (LC50, EC50) on a variety of aquatic organisms tested in many jurisdictions, drawn primarily from the USEPA ECOTOX database (2002) (available at http //www.epa.gov/ ecotox). If the upper 5th centile of the measured chemical exposure data distribution did not exceed the lower 5th centile of its estimated chronic toxicity distribution, the potential ecological risk posed by the chemical was judged to be tolerable (Hall and Giddings, 2000). [Pg.349]

As an example, 2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP) is an acidic compound with a pA"a of 7.68 and a K0Wni of 3.06 (Mackay et al. 1997). Consultation of the USEPA Ecotox database reveals a chronic reproduction toxicity NOEC value for Daphnia... [Pg.60]

USEPA ECOTOX Database, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2006. http //www.epa.gov/ecotox/ecotox home.htm... [Pg.243]

The toxic pressure of each of the compounds in a mixture is calculated using the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) concept. In this concept, laboratory toxicity data for various species are collected from a database, for example, the USEPA s Ecotox database (USEPA 2005) or the RIVM e-toxBase (Wintersen et al. 2004), and compiled for each compound. A statistical distribution of these data, called the SSD, is derived. Each SSD describes the relationship between exposure concentration (X) and toxic pressure (Y), whereby the latter is expressed as the probably affected fraction (PAF, %) per compound (Posthuma et al. 2002). Depending on the test endpoint chosen for deriving SSDs, there is the option to derive chronic and acute toxic pressures, based on SSDN0ECs and SSDEC50s, respectively. [Pg.179]

USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. ECOTOX database. US Environmental Protection Agency. Available from http //cfpub.epa.gov/ecotox/... [Pg.266]

USEPA (2007) ECOTOXicology Database System. Version 4.0. Available at http //cfpub. epa.gov/ecotox... [Pg.204]

Besides meeting its assumptions, other problems in the application of SSD in risk assessment to extrapolate from the population level to the community level also exist. First, when use is made of databases (such as ECOTOX USEPA 2001) from which it is difficult to check the validity of the data, one does not know what is modeled. In practice, a combination of differences between laboratories, between endpoints, between test durations, between test conditions, between genotypes, between phenotypes, and eventually between species is modeled. Another issue is the ambiguous integration of SSD with exposure distribution to calculate risk (Verdonck et al. 2003). They showed that, in order to be able to set threshold levels using probabilistic risk assessment and interpret the risk associated with a given exposure concentration distribution and SSD, the spatial and temporal interpretations of the exposure concentration distribution must be known. [Pg.121]

US Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA], Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Fate and Effects Division. 2001. Environmental effects database (EEDB). ECO-TOX Database System, http //www.epa.gov/ecotox/ (accessed July 23, 2005). [Pg.363]


See other pages where USEPA ECOTOX database is mentioned: [Pg.159]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.159 ]




SEARCH



ECOTOX

Ecotox database

Ecotoxic

Ecotoxicity

Ecotoxicity database

USEPA

© 2024 chempedia.info