Type II isotherms

Because of their prevalence in physical adsorption studies on high-energy, powdered solids, type II isotherms are of considerable practical importance. Bmnauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) [39] showed how to extent Langmuir s approach to multilayer adsorption, and their equation has come to be known as the BET equation. The derivation that follows is the traditional one, based on a detailed balancing of forward and reverse rates. 

The very considerable success of the BET equation stimulated various investigators to consider modifications of it that would correct certain approximations and give a better fit to type II isotherms. Thus if it is assumed that multilayer formation is limited to n layers, perhaps because of the opposing walls of a capillary being involved, one... 

There is little doubt that, at least with type II isotherms, we can tell the approximate point at which multilayer adsorption sets in. The concept of a two-dimensional phase seems relatively sterile as applied to multilayer adsorption, except insofar as such isotherm equations may be used as empirically convenient, since the thickness of the adsorbed film is not easily allowed to become variable. 

A Type II isotherm indicates that the solid is non-porous, whilst the Type IV isotherm is characteristic of a mesoporous solid. From both types of isotherm it is possible, provided certain complications are absent, to calculate the specific surface of the solid, as is explained in Chapter 2. Indeed, the method most widely used at the present time for the determination of the surface area of finely divided solids is based on the adsorption of nitrogen at its boiling point. From the Type IV isotherm the pore size distribution may also be evaluated, using procedures outlined in Chapter 3. 

The physical adsorption of gases by non-porous solids, in the vast majority of cases, gives rise to a Type II isotherm. From the Type II isotherm of a given gas on a particular solid it is possible in principle to derive a value of the monolayer capacity of the solid, which in turn can be used to calculate the specific surface of the solid. The monolayer capacity is defined as the amount of adsorbate which can be accommodated in a completely filled, single molecular layer—a monolayer—on the surface of unit mass (1 g) of the solid. It is related to the specific surface area A, the surface area of 1 g of the solid, by the simple equation... 

To obtain the monolayer capacity from the isotherm, it is necessary to interpret the (Type II) isotherm in quantitative terms. A number of theories have been advanced for this purpose from time to time, none with complete success. The best known of them, and perhaps the most useful in relation to surface area determination, is that of Brunauer, Emmett and Teller. Though based on a model which is admittedly over-simplified and open to criticism on a number of grounds, the theory leads to an expression—the BET equation —which, when applied with discrimination, has proved remarkably successful in evaluating the specific surface from a Type II isotherm. 

If plotted as n/n against p/p°. Equation (2.12) gives a curve having the shape of a Type II isotherm so long as c exceeds 2. From Fig. 2.1 it is seen... 

The Type II isotherms obtained experimentally often display a rather long straight portion (BC in Fig. 2.9), a feature not strictly compatible with the properties of the BET equation which, as we have seen, yields a point of... 

Fig. 2.9 A typical Type II isotherm, showing Point A and Point B .

The kind of results adduced in the present section justify the conclusion that the quantity n calculated by means of the BET equation from the Type II isotherm corresponds reasonably well to the actual monolayer capacity of the solid. The agreement lies within, say, +20 per cent, or often better, provided the isotherm has a well defined Point B. 

As will be demonstrated in Chapter 4, however, the presence of micropores distorts the Type II isotherm in a sense which is reflected in a much increased value of the constant c. In such cases the value of c is no guide at all to the course of the isotherm on the external surface. Consequently the appropriate criterion for choosing the correct f-curve for a particular system is the similarity in chemical properties and not in c-values l>etween the solid under test and the reference solid. 

If micropores are introduced into a solid which originally gave a standard Type II isotherm, the uptake is enhanced in the low-pressure region and the isotherm is correspondingly distorted. The effect on the t-plot is indicated in... 

Fig. 3.1 A Type IV isotherm. The corresponding Type II isotherm follows the course ABCN (cf. dashed line).

Examples are provided by the work of Carman and Raal with CF2CI2 on silica powder, of Zwietering" with nitrogen on silica spherules and of Kiselev" with hexane on carbon black and more recently of Gregg and Langford with nitrogen on alumina spherules compacted at a series of pressures. In all cases, a well defined Type II isotherm obtained with the loose powder became an equally well defined Type IV isotherm with the compact moreover both branches of the hysteresis loop were situated (drove the isotherm for the uncompacted powder, but the pre-hysteresis region was scarcely affected (cf. Fig. 3.4). The results of all these and similar... 

It follows therefore that the specific surface of a mesoporous solid can be determined by the BET method (or from Point B) in just the same way as that of a non-porous solid. It is interesting, though not really surprising, that monolayer formation occurs by the same mechanism whether the surface is wholly external (Type II isotherm) or is largely located on the walls of mesopores (Type IV isotherm). Since the adsorption field falls off fairly rapidly with distance from the surface, the building up of the monolayer should not be affected by the presence of a neighbouring surface which, as in a mesopore, is situated at a distance large compared with the size of a molecule. 

Any interpretation of the Type I isotherm must account for the fact that the uptake does not increase continuously as in the Type II isotherm, but comes to a limiting value manifested in the plateau BC (Fig. 4.1). According to the earlier, classical view, this limit exists because the pores are so narrow that they cannot accommodate more than a single molecular layer on their walls the plateau thus corresponds to the completion of the monolayer. The shape of the isotherm was explained in terms of the Langmuir model, even though this had initially been set up for an open surface, i.e. a non-porous solid. The Type I isotherm was therefore assumed to conform to the Langmuir equation already referred to, viz. 

Thus, whilst a powder composed of nonporous particles gives rise to an isotherm of Type II, the converse is not necessarily true if a solid yields a Type II isotherm, it is not necessarily free of micropores. Similarly, though a Type IV isotherm signifies the presence of mesoporosity, it does not prove the absence of microporosity. - ... 

The table convincingly demonstrates how the unsuspected presence of micropores can lead to an erroneous value of the specific surface calculated from a Type II isotherm by application of the standard BET procedure. According to the foregoing analysis, the external specific surface of the solid is 114m g" the micropore volume (from the vertical separation of isotherms A and E) is 105 mm g but since the average pore width is not precisely known, the area of the micropore walls cannot be calculated. Thus the BET figure of 360m g calculated from isotherm E represents merely an apparent and not a true surface area. 

Here the phenomenon of capillary pore condensation comes into play. The adsorption on an infinitely extended, microporous material is described by the Type I isotherm of Fig. 5.20. Here the plateau measures the internal volume of the micropores. For mesoporous materials, one will first observe the filling of a monolayer at relatively low pressures, as in a Type II isotherm, followed by build up of multilayers until capillary condensation sets in and puts a limit to the amount of gas that can be accommodated in the material. Removal of the gas from the pores will show a hysteresis effect the gas leaves the pores at lower equilibrium pressures than at which it entered, because capillary forces have to be overcome. This Type IV isotherm. 

In order to elucidate the pore structure of Csx, the adsorption-desorption isotherm of N2 was first measured. Tsrical results are given in Figure 4. H3PW12O40 exhibited a Type II isotherm (according to the lUPAC classification... 

The way in which a material adsorbs a gas is referred to as an adsorption isotherm. All adsorption isotherms can be described by five representative curves, given in Fig. 1. The isotherm shapes reflect specific conditions for adsorption, such as pore size and heats of adsorption [6]. The most common type of isotherm and the most useful for BET measurements is the Type II isotherm. The inflection point of this isotherm usually indicates monolayer coverage of the adsorbate [9]. 

The advantage of equation 17.14 is that it may be fitted to all known shapes of adsorption isotherm. In 1938, a classification of isotherms was proposed which consisted of the five shapes shown in Figure 17.5 which is taken from the work of Brunauer et alSu Only gas-solid systems provide examples of all the shapes, and not all occur frequently. It is not possible to predict the shape of an isotherm for a given system, although it has been observed that some shapes are often associated with a particular adsorbent or adsorbate properties. Charcoal, with pores just a few molecules in diameter, almost always gives a Type I isotherm. A non-porous solid is likely to give a Type II isotherm. If the cohesive forces between adsorbate molecules are greater than the adhesive forces between adsorbate and adsorbent, a Type V isotherm is likely to be obtained for a porous adsorbent and a Type III isotherm for a non-porous one. 

The majority of physisorption isotherms (Fig. 1.14 Type I-VI) and hysteresis loops (Fig. 1.14 H1-H4) are classified by lUPAC [21]. Reversible Type 1 isotherms are given by microporous (see below) solids having relatively small external surface areas (e.g. activated carbon or zeolites). The sharp and steep initial rise is associated with capillary condensation in micropores which follow a different mechanism compared with mesopores. Reversible Type II isotherms are typical for non-porous or macroporous (see below) materials and represent unrestricted monolayer-multilayer adsorption. Point B indicates the stage at which multilayer adsorption starts and lies at the beginning of the almost linear middle section. Reversible Type III isotherms are not very common. They have an indistinct point B, since the adsorbent-adsorbate interactions are weak. An example for such a system is nitrogen on polyethylene. Type IV isotherms are very common and show characteristic hysteresis loops which arise from different adsorption and desorption mechanisms in mesopores (see below). Type V and Type VI isotherms are uncommon, and their interpretation is difficult. A Type VI isotherm can arise with stepwise multilayer adsorption on a uniform nonporous surface. 

As discussed in Section 1.4.2.1, the critical condensation pressure in mesopores as a function of pore radius is described by the Kelvin equation. Capillary condensation always follows after multilayer adsorption, and is therefore responsible for the second upwards trend in the S-shaped Type II or IV isotherms (Fig. 1.14). If it can be completed, i.e. all pores are filled below a relative pressure of 1, the isotherm reaches a plateau as in Type IV (mesoporous polymer support). Incomplete filling occurs with macroporous materials containing even larger pores, resulting in a Type II isotherm (macroporous polymer support), usually accompanied by a H3 hysteresis loop. Thus, the upper limit of pore size where capillary condensation can occur is determined by the vapor pressure of the adsorptive. Above this pressure, complete bulk condensation would occur. Pores greater than about 50-100 nm in diameter (macropores) cannot be measured by nitrogen adsorption. 

---