Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Truncated correction factor

These theoretical calculations are subject to systematic errors arising from basis set truncation and neglect of higher perturbation order electron correlation effects. Therefore, we have added a second step to our procedure in which we attempt to account for these deficiencies by adding empirically derived Bond-Additivity-Correction (BAC) factors that are based on the types of bonds present in the given molecule. The correction factors for NH (9.4 kcal-mole" ) and OH (10.7 kcal-mole" ) bonds are obtained as the difference between the theoretical and... [Pg.104]

The second, third, and fourth corrections to [MPd/b-Jl lG(d,p)] are analogous to A (- -). The zero point energy has been discussed in detail (scale factor 0.8929 see Scott and Radom, 1996), leaving only HLC, called the higher level correction, a purely empirical correction added to make up for the practical necessity of basis set and Cl truncation. In effect, thermodynamic variables are calculated by methods described immediately below and HLC is adjusted to give the best fit to a selected group of experimental results presumed to be reliable. [Pg.314]

The higher-order contributions to the correlation energy [such as CCSD(T)-MP2] are more than an order of magnitude smaller than their second-order counterparts. However, the basis set convergence to the CCSD(T)-R12 limit does not follow the simple linear behavior found for the second-order correlation energy. This is a consequence of the interference effect described in Eq. (2.2). The full Cl or CCSD(T) basis set truncation error is attenuated by the interference factor (Fig. 4.9). The CBS correction to the higher-order components of the correlation energy is thus the difference between the left-hand sides of Eqs. (2.2) and... [Pg.117]

The present study clearly shows that for a reliable description of the isotropic hfcc s, less than 2 % of the total MR-CI space has to be handled variationally, if the effects of neglected configurations are taken into account using perturbation theory. The most elaborate calculations of Ajso(13C) (72 reference configurations, 25000 configurations handled variationally, 2000 configurations corrected perturbationally) give the value 41.6 MHz. The error with respect to experiment is about 11 %, i.e. the error of 20 % in the truncated MR-CI wavefunction has been reduced by a factor of two. [Pg.313]

A computer simulation approach has been derived that allows detailed bimolecular reaction rate constant calculations in the presence of these and other complicating factors. In this approach, diffusional trajectories of reactants are computed by a Brownian dynamics procedure the rate constant is then obtained by a formal branching anaylsis that corrects for the truncation of certain long trajectories. The calculations also provide mechanistic information, e.g., on the steering of reactants into favorable configurations by electrostatic fields. The application of this approach to simple models of enzyme-substrate systems is described. [Pg.216]

Although PET/CT modality is widely employed for diagnostic purpose, CT data acquired either for fusion of PET and CT images or for photon attenuation correction are affected by several factors that cause artifacts in PET/CT images. The factors include patient positioning, metal objects, CT contrast agents, truncation artifacts, and respiratory movement, which are discussed below. [Pg.62]

Figure 3.15. Effect of truncation on attenuation correction due to difference in patient port diameter between CT ( 50cm) and PET (70-85 cm) scanners. CT attenuation factors are extrapolated to the extent of the PET FOV to correct for the truncated area. (Reprinted with permission from Parker et al at Web site, http //www.jpnm.org)... Figure 3.15. Effect of truncation on attenuation correction due to difference in patient port diameter between CT ( 50cm) and PET (70-85 cm) scanners. CT attenuation factors are extrapolated to the extent of the PET FOV to correct for the truncated area. (Reprinted with permission from Parker et al at Web site, http //www.jpnm.org)...
Whereas Cl methods are variational, giving upper bounds to the total energy, the other discriminating factor in choice of correlated method is whether a method scales correctly with size, or, equivalently, the number of electrons. This (size) extensive property, which can be quite significant numerically, is satisfied by many-body methods (e.g., MBPT, CC, and QCI methods) but not by Cl methods other than full Cl. Truncated Cl ap-... [Pg.81]


See other pages where Truncated correction factor is mentioned: [Pg.270]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.842]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.687]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.341]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.270 ]




SEARCH



Correction factors

Truncating

Truncation

© 2024 chempedia.info