Trends across the Periods

The first ionization energies of the elements of the second Period. 

---

P and Cl are members of the same period. Cl should have a smaller radius in keeping with the usual trend across the period. The experimental value is 0.10 nm. 

We see that the heat of solution has the same trend across the periodic table for the three rows of elements. This is an indication that the heat of solution is determined by the coarse electronic structure of the host metal [15]. In the case of the entropy term. 

It is remarkable that the Dirac theory of the relativistic electron perfectly describes this deviation, and the difference to the reference (the nonrelativistic value) is unusually well defined by the limit of a single parameter (the velocity of light) at infinity. The special difficulty encountered in measuring relativistic effects is that relativistic quantum mechanics is by no means a standard part of a chemist s education, and therefore the theory for interpreting a measurement is often not readily at hand. Still, a great many of the properties of chemical substances and materials, in particular, trends across the periodic system of elements, can be understood in terms of relativistic effects without having to consider the details of the theory. 

The initial sticking probability is sensitively dependent on the gas-metal system, spanning the range 1 < s0 < 10-7, although for H2, 02 and CO and N2 on metals and at substrate temperatures where chemisorption does occur, sticking probabilities are generally between 0.1 and 1. Trends across the periodic table are examined in Fig. 16 and 17, where the most reliable data for polycrystalline ribbons, films or foils of the transition... 

Both surface atoms and adsorbates must participate to form the surface chemical bond. In order to determine the nature of the bond, the heat of adsorption is measured as a function of the pertinent variables. These include trends across the periodic table, variations of bond energies with adsorbate size, molecular structure and coverage, and substrate structure. Changes in the electronic and atomic structure of the bonding partners are determined and compared with their electronic and atomic (or molecular) structure before they formed the surface bond. 

Catalysis by transition-metal surfaces exhibit trends across the periodic table whereby metals that form chemical bonds of intermediate strength have the highest activities. 

In general, the first ionisation energy increases across Period 3 as the positive nuclear charge increases and electrons successively fill the third quantum shell. As electrons are in the same shell, the shielding effect is similar in atoms of each element. There are small dips in the general trend across the period between Mg and Al, and between P and S. The same pattern appears in Period 2 for Be and B, and N and O. The explanation given on pages 41-2 also applies here in Period 3. 

Figure 2.2 Electronegativity values and trends. Electronegativity generally increases from left to right across the periodic table and decreases front top to bottom. The values are on an arbitrary scale, with F = 4.0 and Cs = 0.7. Elements in orange are the most electronegative, those in yellow are medium, and those in green are the least electronegative.

To see the trend in chemistry as we move across the periodic table, we will consider three types... 

Looking at the trends in dissociation probability across the transition metal series, dissociation is favored towards the left, and associative chemisorption towards the right. This is nicely illustrated for CO on the 4d transition metals in Fig. 6.36, which shows how, for Pd and Ag, molecular adsorption of CO is more stable than adsorption of the dissociation products. Rhodium is a borderline case and to the left of rhodium dissociation is favored. Note that the heat of adsorption of the C and O atoms changes much more steeply across the periodic table than that for the CO molecule. A similar situation occurs with NO, which, however, is more reactive than CO, and hence barriers for dissociation are considerably lower for NO. 

II. The general trend is for ionization energy to increase as one moves from left to right across the periodic table and to decrease as one moves down this is the inverse of the trend one finds in examining the atomic radius. 

Comparison between FP and TC lattice stabilities Despite the variety of assumptions that have been used, some general trends for die resultant lattice stabilities have been obtained for various crystal structures across the periodic table. The mean values of such (FP) lattice stabilities can therefore be compared with the equivalent values determined by thermochemical (TC) methods. Such a comparison shows the following irrqiortant features (Miodownik 1986, Watson et al. 1986, Saunders et al. 1988, Miodownik 1992) ... 

What general trends are noticeable across the Periodic Table in the values of (a) the first ionization energies, (b) the first electron attachment energies, and (c) the covalent radii of the elements ... 

There is a general downward trend in the radii going across the period, but the dips at V2 +, Ni2 +, V3+ and Co3 +, and the general shape of the plot, may be explained in terms of which d orbitals are occupied in each case. 

In this chapter we will show that the tight binding ( ) description of the covalent bond is able to provide a simple and unifying explanation for the above structural trends and behaviour. We will see that the ideas already introduced in chapter 4 on the structures of small molecules may be taken over to these infinite bulk systems. In particular, we will find that the trends in structural stability across the periodic table or within the structure maps can be linked directly to the topology of the local atomic environment through the moments theorem of Ducastelle and Cyrot-Lackmann (1971). 

---