Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Transport effects interparticle

In view of the above developments, it is now possible to formulate theories of the complex phase behavior and critical phenomena that one observes in stractured continua. Furthermore, there is currently little data on the transport properties, rheological characteristics, and thermomechaiucal properties of such materials, but the thermodynamics and dynamics of these materials subject to long-range interparticle interactions (e.g., disjoiiung pressure effects, phase separation, and viscoelastic behavior) can now be approached systematically. Such studies will lead to sigiuficant intellectual and practical advances. [Pg.179]

Interpretation of pubhshed data is often comphcated by the fact that rather complex catalytic materials are utilized, namely, poly disperse nonuniform metal particles, highly porous supports, etc., where various secondary effects may influence or even submerge PSEs. These include mass transport and discrete particle distribution effects in porous layers, as confirmed by Gloaguen, Antoine, and co-workers [Gloaguen et al., 1994, 1998 Antoine et al., 1998], and diffusion-readsorption effects, as shown by Jusys and co-workers for the MOR and by Chen and Kucemak for the ORR [Jusys et al., 2003 Chen and Kucemak, 2004a, b]. Novel approaches to the design of ordered nanoparticle arrays where nanoparticle size and interparticle distances can be varied independently are expected to shed hght on PSEs in complex multistep multielectron processes such as the MOR and the ORR. [Pg.551]

In the case of reservoir systems that rely on the cohesivity of the blend due to interparticle interactions, studies are required on vibrational stability in simulated storage, transport, and use tests, including determination of the effects of elevated temperature and humidity. [Pg.654]

In this study the ratio of the particle sizes was set to two based on the average value for the two samples. As a result, if the diffusion is entirely controlled by secondary pore structure (interparticle diffusion) the ratio of the effective diffusion time constants (Defl/R2) will be four. In contrast, if the mass transport process is entirely controlled by intraparticle (platelet) diffusion, the ratio will become equal to unity (diffusion independent of the composite particle size). For transient situations (in which both resistances are important) the values of the ratio will be in the one to four range. Diffusional time constants for different sorbates in the Si-MCM-41 sample were obtained from experimental ZLC response curves according to the analysis discussed in the experimental section. Experiments using different purge flow rates, as well as different purge gases... [Pg.642]

Early experience also showed that the induced plasma current in a tokamak generates a magnetic field that loops die minor axis nf Ihe torus. The field lines form helices along the toroidal surface the plasma must cross the lines to escape. It does so through the cumulative action of many random displacements caused by interparticle collisions, tin effect diffusing across the field lines and out of the system). Thermal energy is transported by much the same process. [Pg.696]

In the transport of fine particles, it is important to understand interparticle force effects during the particle motion. On the basis of the data provided by Massimilla and Donsi (1976), i.e., har = 2 eV s = 50 A pp = 1,000-2,000 kg/m3 = 20 - 1,000 pm, discuss the relative significance of the gravitational force to the van der Waals force for disperse particles with these properties. [Pg.128]

Interparticle transport may be possible either by surface diffusion across the support or by vapor phase transport. Depending on the supported systems and on the sintering conditions the particles may grow predominantly via one of these possible routes. Supported PcFe deposits have been sintered in experimental conditions close to that of the condensation process (T = 235°C, residual pressure 10 torr). The surface areas of PcFe after 2 and 3 hours of sintering are shown in Table IV. It is seen that the sintering effect is more pronounced with a homogeneous carbon support. [Pg.325]

The coefficients a(p, c) and tj(p, c) describe chemical and physical effects on the kinetics of deposition. The transport of particles from the bulk of the flowing fluid to the surface of a collector or media grain by physical processes such as Brownian diffusion, fluid flow (direct interception), and gravity are incorporated into theoretical formulations for fj(p, c), together with corrections to account for hydrodynamic retardation or the lubrication effect as the two solids come into close proximity. Chemical effects are usually considered in evaluating a(p, c). These include interparticle forces arising from electrostatic interactions and steric effects originating from interactions between adsorbed layers of polymers and polyelectrolytes on the solid surfaces. [Pg.450]

Three particle transport processes that bring about interparticle contacts are considered here Brownian diffusion (thermal effects), fluid shear (flow effects), and differential settling (gravity effects). Following Smoluchowski s approach, the appropriate individual transport coefficients for these three processes arc as... [Pg.459]

Under these circumstances, the interparticle transport resistances can be neglected. What are left are the intraparticle resistances, i.e. the heat and mass transfer effects inside the catalyst particles. Since the current case reflects the situation that few reactant and product molecules exist in an environment of solvent molecules, the simplest Fick s law approach with effective diffusion coefficients can be considered as sufficient for the description of molecular diffusion. [Pg.465]

This kinetic zero average contrast (KZAC) experiment [100-102] is an extension to the static zero average contrast (ZAC) described in Sect. 3.1.7. ZAC is used to effectively remove the structure factor such that interparticle correlations are eliminated and the single entities are visible, whereas in KZAC the trick is used to render mixing processes hence, diffusion and transport become observable without perturbing the system in any substantial way. [Pg.102]

When multiple scattering is discarded from the measured signal, DLS can be used to study the dynamics of concentrated suspensions, in which the Brownian motion of individual particles (self-diffusion) differs from the diffusive mass transport (gradient or collective diffusion), which causes local density fluctuations, and where the diffusion on very short time-scales (r < c lD) deviates from those on large time scales (r c D lones and Pusey 1991 Banchio et al. 2000). These different diffusion coefficients depend on the microstructure of the suspension, i.e. on the particle concentration and on the interparticle forces. For an unknown suspension it is not possible to state a priori which of them is probed by a DLS experiment. For this reason, a further concentration limit must be obeyed when DLS is used for basic characterisation tasks such as particle sizing. As a rule of thumb, such concentration effects vanish below concentrations of 0.01-0.1 vol%, but certainty can only be gained by experiment. [Pg.42]

The equations of motion for granular flows have been derived by adopting the kinetic theory of dense gases. This approach involves a statistical-mechanical treatment of transport phenomena rather than the kinematic treatment more commonly employed to derive these relationships for fluids. The motivation for going to the formal approach (i.e., dense gas theory) is that the stress field consists of static, translational, and collisional components and the net effect of these can be better handled by statistical mechanics because of its capability for keeping track of collisional trajectories. However, when the static and collisional contributions are removed, the equations of motion derived from dense gas theory should (and do) reduce to the same form as the continuity and momentum equations derived using the traditional continuum fluid dynamics approach. In fact, the difference between the derivation of the granular flow equations by the kinetic approach described above and the conventional approach via the Navier Stokes equations is that, in the latter, the material properties, such as viscosity, are determined by experiment while in the former the fluid properties are mathematically deduced by statistical mechanics of interparticle collision. [Pg.64]

The concept of criteria for exclusion of interparticle mass and heat transfer effects is the following. Since during a reaction non-zero gradients of concentration and/or of temperature always exist in the fixed bed reactor (albeit sometimes they are very small), a somewhat arbitrary assumption has to be made about the maximum deviation up to which the reaction can be considered not to be influenced by axial and radial mass and heat transport phenomena. The maximum deviation commonly used is 5%, for example, of the reaction rate compared to the zero-gradient rate or of the reactor length compared to the length of an ideal PFR. [Pg.357]

In highly vibrationally excited molecules the quantum mechanical aspects of particle motion are less significant and the details of the interparticle potential also less important. Just as with high-temperature gas-phase transport, discussed in Chapter 2, the repulsive part of the potential has the most significant effect on reaction dynamics. A study of the recombination kinetics of Brg with the buffer gases He, Ne, Ar, and Kr shows the steady trend predicted by (10.8)—the more massive the rare gas atom, the more effective it is at stabilizing... [Pg.332]

We compare the intrinsic rate of adsorption of nitrogen with an experimentally observed rate of adsorption of nitrogen at 6 bar and 25°C (Crittenden et al. 1995). Appropriate substitution of numerical values into equation (4.1) gives the maximum intrinsic rate of adsorption as 2 x 10 kg m s" . On the other hand, the experimentally observed rate is approximately 4 x 10 kg s (c. 0.33 mol s" at 6 bar, 25°C onto a surface of 250 m g ). Thus the intrinsic rate of adsorption is some 10 times faster than the observed rate of adsorption. It is generally acknowledged throughout the literature on physical adsorption processes that the dominant rate-controlling step is not the actual physical attachment of adsorbate to adsorbent (normally referred to as very rapid) but rather intraparticle transport of gas within the porous structure of the adsorbent to its available surface. Interparticle transport from bulk fluid to the external surface of the porous adsorbent may also have an effect on the overall rate of adsorption under some circumstances. [Pg.67]

Kim and Lee"" studied electron transport at the air-water interface in LB monolayers of dithiol-protected Au25 and the effect of interparticle spacing. Through the use of atomically precise clusters. [Pg.92]


See other pages where Transport effects interparticle is mentioned: [Pg.532]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.2382]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.817]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.597]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.2382]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.5807]    [Pg.1049]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.90]   


SEARCH



Effective transport

Interparticle

Interparticle transport

Transport effects

© 2024 chempedia.info