Transition state theory preexponential factor

A more interesting possibility, one that has attracted much attention, is that the activation parameters may be temperature dependent. In Chapter 5 we saw that theoiy predicts that the preexponential factor contains the quantity T", where n = 5 according to collision theory, and n = 1 according to the transition state theory. In view of the uncertainty associated with estimation of the preexponential factor, it is not possible to distinguish between these theories on the basis of the observed temperature dependence, yet we have the possibility of a source of curvature. Nevertheless, the exponential term in the Arrhenius equation dominates the temperature behavior. From Eq. (6-4), we may examine this in terms either of or A//. By analogy with equilibrium thermodynamics, we write... 

Relationships between reaction rate and temperature can thus be used to detect non-classical behaviour in enzymes. Non-classical values of the preexponential factor ratio (H D i 1) and difference in apparent activation energy (>5.4kJmoRi) have been the criteria used to demonstrate hydrogen tunnelling in the enzymes mentioned above. A major prediction from this static barrier (transition state theory-like) plot is that tunnelling becomes more prominent as the apparent activation energy decreases. This holds for the enzymes listed above, but the correlation breaks down for enzymes... 

Arrhenius proposed his equation in 1889 on empirical grounds, justifying it with the hydrolysis of sucrose to fructose and glucose. Note that the temperature dependence is in the exponential term and that the preexponential factor is a constant. Reaction rate theories (see Chapter 3) show that the Arrhenius equation is to a very good approximation correct however, the assumption of a prefactor that does not depend on temperature cannot strictly be maintained as transition state theory shows that it may be proportional to 7. Nevertheless, this dependence is usually much weaker than the exponential term and is therefore often neglected. 

A pre-exponential factor and activation energy for each rate constant must be established. All forward rate constants involving alkyne adsorption (ki, k2, and ks) are assumed to have equal pre-exponential factors specified by the collision limit (assuming a sticking coefficient of one). All adsorption steps are assumed to be non-activated. Both desorption constants (k.i and k ) are assumed to have preexponential factors equal to 10 3 sec, as expected from transition-state theory [28]. Both desorption activation energies (26.1 kcal/mol for methyl acetylene and 25.3 kcal/mol for trimethylbenzene) were derived from TPD results [1]. 

If friction plays a role in the crossing of the energy barrier, the reaction is slower than predicted by transition-state theory. According to Kramers theory [20] the preexponential factor must then be replaced by ... 

Various statistical treatments of reaction kinetics provide a physical picture for the underlying molecular basis for Arrhenius temperature dependence. One of the most common approaches is Eyring transition state theory, which postulates a thermal equilibrium between reactants and the transition state. Applying statistical mechanical methods to this equilibrium and to the inherent rate of activated molecules transiting the barrier leads to the Eyring equation (Eq. 10.3), where k is the Boltzmann constant, h is the Planck s constant, and AG is the relative free energy of the transition state [note Eq. (10.3) ignores a transmission factor, which is normally 1, in the preexponential term]. 

Holroyd (1977) finds that generally the attachment reactions are very fast (fej - 1012-1013 M 1s 1), are relatively insensitive to temperature, and increase with electron mobility. The detachment reactions are sensitive to temperature and the nature of the liquid. Fitted to the Arrhenius equation, these reactions show very large preexponential factors, which allow the endothermic detachment reactions to occur despite high activation energy. Interpreted in terms of the transition state theory and taking the collision frequency as 1013 s 1- these preexponential factors give activation entropies 100 to 200 J/(mole.K), depending on the solute and the solvent. 

So far, only the nuclear reorganization energy attending electron transfer has been discussed, yielding the expressions above of the free energy of activation in the framework of classical transition state theory. A second series of important factors are those that govern the preexponential factor, k, raising in particular the question of the adiabaticity or nonadiabaticity of electron transfer between a molecule and the electronic states in the electrode. 

The Marcus classical free energy of activation is AG , the adiabatic preexponential factor A may be taken from Eyring s Transition State Theory as (kg T /h), and Kel is a dimensionless transmission coefficient (0 < k l < 1) which includes the entire efiFect of electronic interactions between the donor and acceptor, and which becomes crucial at long range. With Kel set to unity the rate expression has only nuclear factors and in particular the inner sphere and outer sphere reorganization energies mentioned in the introduction are dominant parameters controlling AG and hence the rate. It is assumed here that the rate constant may be taken as a unimolecular rate constant, and if needed the associated bimolecular rate constant may be constructed by incorporation of diffusional processes as ... 

MICHAELIS-MENTEN KINETICS PREEXPONENTIAL FACTOR ARRHENIUS EQUATION COLLISION THEORY TRANSITION-STATE THEORY ENTROPY OF ACTIVATION PRENYL-PROTEIN-SPECIFIC ENDOPEP-TIDASE... 

As seen in Tables 22—25, the Arrhenius preexponential factors Aa for the initiation step are very low, 10 in 7, 10 in 20, 10 " in 41 and 1in 44. These are very low values for bimolecular reactions for which values of about 10 ° are observed and also predicted by the Transition State Theory Thus step (a) belongs to a class of slow reactions , some of which might have ionic transition states . The activation entropies AS obtained from the Transition State Theory rate constant expression... 

The preexponential factor involves the entropy change in going from reactants to the transition state the more highly ordered and tightly bound is the transition state, the more negative A S° will be and the lower the preexponential factor will be. Transition state theory thus automatically takes into account the effect of steric factors on rate constants, in contrast to collision theory. 

Transition-state theory is one of the earliest attempts to explain chemical reaction rates from first principles. It was initially developed by Eyring [124] and Evans and Polayni [122,123], The conventional transition-state theory (CTST) discussed here provides a relatively straightforward method to estimate reaction rate constants, particularly the preexponential factor in an Arrhenius expression. This theory is sometimes also known as activated complex theory. More advanced versions of transition-state theory have also been developed over the years [401],... 

Table 4.1 Comparison of experimental A factors with preexponential factors calculated from transition state theory...

For some reactions, especially those involving large molecules, it might be difficult to determine the precise structure and energy levels of the activated complex. In such cases, it can be useful to phrase the transition-state theory result for the rate constant in thermodynamic terms. It does not bring any new information but an alternative way of interpreting the result. This formulation leads to an expression where the preexponential factor is related to an entropy of activation that, at least qualitatively, can be related to the structure of the activated complex. We will encounter the thermodynamic formulation again in Chapter 10, in connection with chemical reactions in solution, where this formulation is particularly useful. 

There have been many attempts made to calculate the preexponential factors of bimolecular reactions from molecular constants based on the considerations of the transition-state theory. Such efforts depend on a number of educated guesses as to the vibrational properties and structure of the transition-state complex, an assumption about the transmission coefficient for the reaction, and the assumption of the validity of the normal coordinate treatment for computing the thermodynamic properties of polyatomic molecules. 

It is insti uctive to compare the values of pre-exponential factors for elementary step rate constants of simple surface reactions to those anticipated by transition state theory. Recall from Chapter 2 that the pre-exponential factor A is on the order ofkTjh= 10 s when the entropy change to form the transition state is negligible. Some pre-exponential factors for simple unimolecular desorption reactions are presented in Table 5.2.2. For the most part, the entries in the table are within a few orders of magnitude of 10 s . The very high values of the preexponential factor are likely attributed to large increases in the entropy upon formation of the transition state. Bimolecular surface reactions can be treated in the same way. However, one must explicitly account for the total number of surface... 

Table 9.2 Values of the preexponential factor, v, (s ) and entropy of desorption A5 (J/K mol) for some key systems, derived from the SCAC data using equations (9.3) and (9.4) respectively, and compared with those derived from conventional transition state theory (CTST)...

The non-activated adsorption rate coefficients and the preexponential factor of C2H4 desorption are within the ranges as predicted by transition state theory [28]. Since molecular ethene adsorption is not activated, the activation energy for ethene desorption is equal to... 

Transition state theory, which is extremely important, can be applied to complex reactions, theoretically predicting the values of preexponential factors for multistep reaction mechanisms (Figure 3.13), where due to overparametrization direct numerical fitting of rate constants results... 

The sum of estimated adsorption capacities agrees with the total desorbed amounts. Pre-exponential factors are more difficult to evaluate. The calculated pre-exponential factors of the two states were of a very different order of magnitude ( 5.8e-8 and 3.8 for Cat 2). However, comparing these to the transition state theory estimates of preexponential factors, they are both found acceptable, and they are attributed to immobile and mobile adsorption, respectively. 

In case (b) the preexponential factor A is given from transition state theory by (169, 184, 188)... 

Transition-state theory predicts limits of 1 to 2 for the ratio of the preexponential factors with values close to unity most probable . ... 

Shustorovich (5) has reviewed the detailed method and the equations for calculating heat of chemisorption and activation barriers by BOC. The multidimensional activation energies were calculated in the present work and the activation energies are listed in Table 1. The initial preexponential factors were estimated by transition-state theory, employing reasonable chemical assumptions about surface mobility. Dumesic et al. (3) summarized typical ranges of these values used in microkinetic analysis studies. For the reaction A +B —>C +D the preexponential factor is typically 10 s", assuming immobile surface intermediates without rotation. 

The preexponential factors in forward and reverse steps of reactions ri-r2 and rn were selected as adjustable based on sensitivity analysis. It was found that the estimated values deviated only slightly from the initial values estimated by transition-state theory. The kinetic data of methane steam reforming from Xu (15) and our data of methane dry reforming were used for the above adjustment. The reverse step of and forward step of r were forced to meet thermodynamic consistence (6,7). 

By applying transition-state theory, we can calculate the activation entropy AS of this Diels-Alder reaction from Eq. (4), where R is the molar gas constant, A is the preexponential factor in the Arrhenius equation, T is the absolute temperature, kt is the Boltzmann constant, and h is Planck s constant. The values of and AS are presented in Table 19.2. 

---