Traditional CAD

The use of the computer in the design of chemical processes requires a framework for depiction and computation completely different from that of traditional CAD/CAM appHcations. Eor this reason, most practitioners use computer-aided process design to designate those approaches that are used to model the performance of individual unit operations, to compute heat and material balances, and to perform thermodynamic and transport analyses. Typical process simulators have, at their core, techniques for the management of massive arrays of data, computational engines to solve sparse matrices, and unit-operation-specific computational subroutines. 

Cardiac manifestations of SLE often present as pericarditis, myocarditis, electrocardiographic (ECG) changes, or valvular heart disease, including the classic cardiac lesion of Libman-Sacks endocarditis (nonbacterial verrucous endocarditis). Coronary artery disease (CAD) is being seen in SLE with increasing frequency as the life expectancy of SLE patients increases. It is thought that the development of heart disease in these patients is multifactorial. Traditional CAD risk factors are common in patients with SLE. 

Drawing in a traditional CAD program requires that lines and shapes be drawn to the exact measurements required. For example, a 4-inch square must be drawn at 4 inches. If a square is drawn at 3 inches and labeled with a 4-inch dimension, the square would stiU actually be 3 inches. The square can be drawn at any size in parametric modeling and then dimensioned to 4 inches, and it would automatically be changed to 4 inches (see Figure 7-11). 

Compare and contrast the differences between traditional CAD and parametric modeling. 

The introduction of computers to many companies allows proprietary software to be used for layout design. Spreadsheet, mathematical modeling and computer-aided design (CAD) techniques are available and greatly assist the design process, and have added to the resources available to planners. However, the traditional scale models described above will still be useful to present the result to management and shop floor personnel. 

CAM describes a system that can take a CAD product, devise its essential production steps, and electronically communicate this information to manufacturing equipment such as robots. The CAD/CAM system has offered many advantages over past traditional manufacturing systems, including the need for less design effort through the use of CAD and CAD databases, more efficient material use, reduced lead time, greater accuracy, and improved inventory functions. 

Schmidt-Lucke et al. [46] followed 120 patients (43 control subjects, 44 patients with stable CAD, and 33 patients with acute coronary syndromes) for 10 months and recorded MACE events (Fig. 7.2). Patients with reduced EPCs had significantly higher rates of MACE. When the results were analyzed by multivariate analysis, reduced EPC levels were found to be an independent predictor of worse prognosis, even after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors and disease activity (hazard ratio, 3.9 P< 0.05). 

Today we live in an information age. In comparison to only a few years ago, computers have become very accessible to the people of the first world. While there is still some apprehension amongst some of us about the amount of time and energy it might take to learn how to handle one, more and more craftspeople are comfortable working with them. It is inevitable that this technology will somehow influence our craft practice. The first major impact of the computer on traditional craft areas came in the form of CAD/CAM. Computer Aided... 

In traditional production processes such as lathing and miUing, numerical control is widespread and process chains for CAD-based programming of the systems are commonly used. In contrast, winding... 

The top six traditional risks were C-reactive protein, systolic blood pressure, smoking, cholesterol, CAD history, and body mass index. The top six lipid species involved were phosphatidylcholine (PC) 34 5, PC 18 1/18 3, triglyceride 14 0/16 0/18 2, PC 28 0, sphingomyelin 18 2, and the odd carbon PC 33 3. When the two sets of risk factors were combined, the top six were PC 34 5, PC 18 1/18 3, C-reactive protein, triglyceride 14 0/16 0/18 2, PC 28 0, and systolic blood pressure. The results argue that models that include both lipids and traditional risk factors provide statistically more significant classification of unstable vs. stable CAD compared with models based on only traditional factors. 

---