Thinking styles

Styles can be defined using five symbolic attributes (Sternberg 1997) functions, forms, levels, scope, and leanings. A total of 96 basic styles can be distinguished (see Table 3.1. for a sampling), each defined by a single combination of values, one for each attribute. This list of styles is still incomplete. There is an infinite number of thinking styles that each person 

Each human uses a combination of all three styles in their life, but usually one style is dominant in a given individual. Your style of thinking can also reflect the nature of a given job as well, since the best results are usually produced when the style reflects the demands of a task in addition to the human using the preferred style. Which style of thinking allows you to operate best Can you think of a situation or job where you had to use a specific style  

In terms of scope of thinking (Sternberg 1997), an internal style is used primarily by introverts who are mostly, if not entirely, focused on their own reality and do not pay much attention to the thoughts and activities of others. By contrast, people with an external scope are always focused on other people and mostly get their ideas and motivations from interactions with others. Such people are called extroverts.  

---

In mesoscopic physics, because the geometries can be controlled so well, and because the measurements are very accurate, current under different conditions can be appropriately measured and calculated. The models used for mesoscopic transport are the so-called Landauer/Imry/Buttiker elastic scattering model for current, correlated electronic structure schemes to deal with Coulomb blockade limit and Kondo regime transport, and charging algorithms to characterize the effects of electron populations on the quantum dots. These are often based on capacitance analyses (this is a matter of thinking style - most chemists do not consider capacitances when discussing molecular transport junctions). 

Here are a couple hints to assist you in spotting thinking styles. People who make fast decisions and tend to be impatient often have angular middle zone letters. Needle point "m s" and "n s" are typical. For example, Donald Trump s handwriting reveals his lighting fast mind. Many CEO s have this trait, because they have to make quick decisions all day long. 

Thomas Edison has round, almost square top m and n humps. This cumulative fact-upon-fact thinking style assisted him in his own creative process. Note the enthusiasm revealed in the extra... 

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI Myers 8c McCaulley, 1985) which assesses thinking style preferences and other individual styles. 

Figure 3.3 Thinking styles. (Prepared by Michael Sikes based on the Author s sketches.)...

The participants should be also selected for their thinking styles. The majority of participants should be legislative thinkers, because the development of ideas is most natural for them. However, executive thinkers might also develop ideas, although their ideas would be more pragmatic than those of legislative thinkers. Even judicial thinkers should be invited, but as a minority, and they should not be the dominant part of the team. 

Sternberg, R.J. (1997), Thinking Styles, Cambridge, MA Cambridge University Press. 

Summarizing I argue that lead usemess of employees is positively related to Innovative behavior, since embedded lead users derive unmet needs and opportunities for innovation from their own and other users product use. This impacts their work environment, since they are confronted with innovation opportunities with respect to the product field at work as well. Innovative behavior is then furthered by personal factors like innovativeness, locus of control, and thinking style, which are associated with lead usemess. Both situational and personal predictors of innovative work are positively related to lead usemess. This argumentation yields the following h) othesis ... 

Finally, in this text we attempt to appeal to a variety of learning and thinking styles. We appreciate that not all students prefer to think globally, reason deductively, or perceive visually. In each of the exercise sets we have attempted to invoke different styles of learning to make learning chemical engineering as inclusive as possible. 

Kapranos P (2010) Embedding learning and thinking styles into engineering materials courses. In 3rd international symposium for engineering education (Electronic publication). University College Cork... 

---