Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

The surface pressure

Neumann has adapted the pendant drop experiment (see Section II-7) to measure the surface pressure of insoluble monolayers [70]. By varying the droplet volume with a motor-driven syringe, they measure the surface pressure as a function of area in both expansion and compression. In tests with octadecanol monolayers, they found excellent agreement between axisymmetric drop shape analysis and a conventional film balance. Unlike the Wilhelmy plate and film balance, the pendant drop experiment can be readily adapted to studies in a pressure cell [70]. In studies of the rate dependence of the molecular area at collapse, Neumann and co-workers found more consistent and reproducible results with the actual area at collapse rather than that determined by conventional extrapolation to zero surface pressure [71]. The collapse pressure and shape of the pressure-area isotherm change with the compression rate [72]. [Pg.114]

Wlien a surface is compressed by a force/= kL, the surface pressure it =JIL is the force per unit width L producing a decrease in length dl. (Note that L and / are not the same indeed they are orthogonal.) The work is then... [Pg.326]

Surface properties enter tlirough the Yoimg-Laplace equation of state for the surface pressure ... [Pg.726]

The monolayer resulting when amphiphilic molecules are introduced to the water—air interface was traditionally called a two-dimensional gas owing to what were the expected large distances between the molecules. However, it has become quite clear that amphiphiles self-organize at the air—water interface even at relatively low surface pressures (7—10). For example, x-ray diffraction data from a monolayer of heneicosanoic acid spread on a 0.5-mM CaCl2 solution at zero pressure (11) showed that once the barrier starts moving and compresses the molecules, the surface pressure, 7T, increases and the area per molecule, M, decreases. The surface pressure, ie, the force per unit length of the barrier (in N/m) is the difference between CJq, the surface tension of pure water, and O, that of the water covered with a monolayer. Where the total number of molecules and the total area that the monolayer occupies is known, the area per molecules can be calculated and a 7T-M isotherm constmcted. This isotherm (Fig. 2), which describes surface pressure as a function of the area per molecule (3,4), is rich in information on stabiUty of the monolayer at the water—air interface, the reorientation of molecules in the two-dimensional system, phase transitions, and conformational transformations. [Pg.531]

As the barrier moves, the molecules are compressed, the intermolecular distance decreases, the surface pressure increases, and a phase transition may be observed in the isotherm. These phase transitions, characterized by a break in the isotherm, may vary with the subphase pH, and temperature. The first-phase transition, in Figure 2, is assigned to a transition from the gas to the Hquid state, also known as the Hquid-expanded, LE, state. In the Hquid... [Pg.531]

At times when the surface pressure gradient is weak, resulting in light winds in the atmosphere s lowest layers, and there is a closed high-preSsure system aloft, there is potential for the buildup of air pollutant concentrations. This is especially true if the system is slow-moving so that light winds remain in the same vicinity for several days. With light winds there will be little dilution of pollutants at the source and not much advection of the polluted air away from source areas. [Pg.352]

Fig.4.53. Experimental and simulated PM (polarization modulated) IRRAS spectra of single monolayers of (A) PEG and (B) K(LK)7 at the air-water interface. The surface pressure was 20 mN m [4.281],... Fig.4.53. Experimental and simulated PM (polarization modulated) IRRAS spectra of single monolayers of (A) PEG and (B) K(LK)7 at the air-water interface. The surface pressure was 20 mN m [4.281],...
The second part of computing building pressures involves the pressure coefficient for a particular spot on the building. The surface pressure coefficient, Cp, indicates the share of the wind kinetic energy that is transferred to the static pressure ... [Pg.575]

Well Pressure Control 1105 The surface pressure is assumed to be 14.7 psia. Gas concentration at surface is... [Pg.1105]

The terminology of L-B films originates from the names of two scientists who invented the technique of film preparation, which transfers the monolayer or multilayers from the water-air interface onto a solid substrate. The key of the L-B technique is to use the amphiphih molecule insoluble in water, with one end hydrophilic and the other hydrophobic. When a drop of a dilute solution containing the amphiphilic molecules is spread on the water-air interface, the hydrophilic end of the amphiphile is preferentially immersed in the water and the hydrophobic end remains in the air. After the evaporation of solvent, the solution leaves a monolayer of amphiphilic molecules in the form of two-dimensional gas due to relatively large spacing between the molecules (see Fig. 15 (a)). At this stage, a barrier moves and compresses the molecules on the water-air interface, and as a result the intermolecular distance decreases and the surface pressure increases. As the compression from the barrier proceeds, two successive phase transitions of the monolayer can be observed. First a transition from the gas" to the liquid state. [Pg.88]

In a study of mixed monolayers of C60 and p-iert-butylcalix[8]arene, different isotherm behavior was obtained [256]. The surface pressure was observed to rise at a lower molecular area (1.00 nm molecule vs. 2.30 mn molecule in the prior study). Similar isotherms were observed whether a 1 1 mixture or a solution prepared by dissolving the preformed 1 1 complex was spread. The UV spectra of the transferred LB films appeared different than that of bulk C60. It was concluded that a stable 1 1 complex could be formed by spreading the solution either of the mixture or of the complex. This was confirmed in a later study by the same group that included separate spreading of the calixarene and the C60... [Pg.105]

The dependence of the surface pressure upon the time with and without applied electric field is shown in Figure 18. It is clear that the electric field strongly improves the ability of the membrane fragments to form a monolayer at the water surface. [Pg.162]

FIG. 18 Dependence of the surface pressure of BR monolayer upon the time in the presence and absence of the electric field. [Pg.163]

The importance of lipophilicity to bitterness has been well established, both directly and indirectly. The importance of partitioning effects in bitterness perception has been stressed by Rubin and coworkers, and Gardner demonstrated that the threshold concentration of bitter amino acids and peptides correlates very well with molecular connectivity (which is generally regarded as a steric parameter, but is correlated with the octanol-water partition coefficient ). Studies on the surface pressure in monolayers of lipids from bovine, circumvallate papillae also indicated that there is a very good correlation between the concentration of a bitter compound that is necessary in order to give an increase in the surface pressure with the taste threshold in humans. These results and the observations of others suggested that the ability of bitter compounds to penetrate cell membranes is an important factor in bitterness perception. [Pg.318]

The surface potential change, besides the surface pressure, is the most important quantity describing the surface state in the presence of an adsorbed substance. However, the significance in molecular terms of this very useful experimental parameter still remains unclear. It is common in the literature to link A% with the properties of the neutral adsorbate by means of the Helmholtz equation" ... [Pg.38]

Figure 5. Pt cube coverage (estimated from TEM data) as a function of the surface pressure during the Langmuir-Blodgett process. The TEM images are at the surface pressures of (a) 3.6, (b) 4.0, (c) 6.0, (d) 10.6, and (e) 16.9mN/m [15]. (Reprinted from Ref. [15], 2005, with permission from American Chemical Society.)... Figure 5. Pt cube coverage (estimated from TEM data) as a function of the surface pressure during the Langmuir-Blodgett process. The TEM images are at the surface pressures of (a) 3.6, (b) 4.0, (c) 6.0, (d) 10.6, and (e) 16.9mN/m [15]. (Reprinted from Ref. [15], 2005, with permission from American Chemical Society.)...
We studied the surface pressure area isotherms of PS II core complex at different concentrations of NaCl in the subphase (Fig. 2). Addition of NaCl solution greatly enhanced the stability of monolayer of PS II core complex particles at the air-water interface. The n-A curves at subphases of 100 mM and 200 mM NaCl clearly demonstrated that PS II core complexes can be compressed to a relatively high surface pressure (40mN/m), before the monolayer collapses under our experimental conditions. Moreover, the average particle size calculated from tt-A curves using the total amount of protein complex is about 320 nm. This observation agrees well with the particle size directly observed using atomic force microscopy [8], and indicates that nearly all the protein complexes stay at the water surface and form a well-structured monolayer. [Pg.643]

FIG. 2 The surface pressure-area isotherms of PS II core complex with different concentrations of salt in the subphase. Subphase, lOmM tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 2mM sodium ascorbate and concentrations of 100, 200, and 500mM NaCl. Temperature, 23.0 0.5°C. [Pg.643]

We also noticed that the molecular area decreases gradually when the surface pressure is held at a certain value. Two possible explanations for this are (1) there may be some leakage of protein molecules from the surface into the subphase, since the protein is water soluble (2) protein denaturation may be taking place at the air-water interface. [Pg.644]

Our studies on the surface pressure-area isotherms of MGDG and the mixture of PS II core complex and MGDG indicate the presence of both PS II core complex and MGDG in the monolayer. MGDG molecules diluted the PS II core complex concentration in the monolayer. MGDG lipid functions as a support for the protein complex and the resulting mixture forms higher-quality films than PS II core complex alone. [Pg.644]


See other pages where The surface pressure is mentioned: [Pg.381]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.642]    [Pg.642]   


SEARCH



Equilibrium Vapor Pressure over a Curved Surface The Kelvin Effect

Measurement of the surface osmotic pressure

Skill 4.1d-Explain how factors such as temperature, pressure, and surface area affect the dissolving process

Surface pressure

The Effect of Curvature on Vapor Pressure and Surface Tension

The Effect of Pressure on Surface Tension

The influence of pressure on surface tension

Young-Laplace equation for the pressure difference across a curved surface

© 2024 chempedia.info