Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

The Group Structure

The set of symmetry operations of ammonia is said to form a group, G. This is a fundamental mathematical structure consisting of a set of elements and a multiplication rule with the following characteristics  [Pg.24]

Existence of a unit element, E, which leaves aU elements unchanged  [Pg.24]

In the list of elements the unit element is placed in front. As a result, the first row and first column of the multiplication table will simply repeat the ordered list of [Pg.24]

Hence every action can also be undone. If this were not the case, we would have produced a monster that can only continue to grow. In the multiplication table, a unit element at position ij indicates that Ri and Rj are mutual inverses. Clearly, [Pg.24]

In the multiplication table, this is apparent by the fact that no entries are left open. Associativity  [Pg.24]


This is a true permutation as each index appears once and once only in the bottom row. To show that the n elements gai are all distinct suppose that ga2 = ga and multiply on the left by g x to give Oj = a. However, this is impossible since the elements a are all distinct. Moreover, the correspondence is invertible, i.e. a given permutation 11(5) cannot arise from any other group element g, since gai = g ai => g = g on multiplication from the right by a l. These relationships imply a 1 1 correspondence g n(g), which respects the group structures of G and Sn. Thus if gi -> n i) and g2 O 11(52) then gig2 n(5i)II(52), the permutation resulting from successive left multiplications by g2 and g. There are n distinct permutations... [Pg.63]

The group structure under a change of A forces Y(A) to change according to a first order ordinary differential equation. To show this we write... [Pg.163]

Seme special solutions associated with the group structure (3) have been studied by two of us [HUB84, PAA85,HUB85a]. ... [Pg.24]

Proof. The group structure is not involved here at all, only the following result on rings ... [Pg.106]

It is noticeable that the NRG theory developed here furnishes two different groups for the double rotation in planar pyrocatechin (or acetone), and the double rotation and wagging mode in non-planar pyrocatechin (or pyramidal acetone). The group structures, however, are seen to be the same. The Longuet-Higgins theory yields indeed the same Molecular Symmetry Groups for both pyramidal uid planar systems. As a result, the NRG theory is seen to furnish a more det ulled information about the dynamics of the non-rigid systems. [Pg.33]

Use the group structure of the periodic table to predict the empirical formulas for the binary compounds that hydrogen forms with the elements antimony, bromine, tin, and selenium. [Pg.107]

One may think that this generalization is an unnecessary complication, because in all the following examples, 4 is in fact a pair (x, y). However, when group structures on these sets are introduced, the group structure on the Cartesian product in the factoring case is not a direct xxxluct... [Pg.248]

Barut, A.O. 1972. On the Group Structure of the Periodic Table of the Elements in Wybourne, B. Structure of Matter (Proceedings ofthe Rutherford Centennary Symposium, 1971). Canterbury University of Canterbury Press. [Pg.241]

This makes sense because ipi/ifj are single-valued functions on C9 /L. This solves problem (a) raised above, (b) however is even more remarkable. In fact, to introduce the group structure into the picture, for all 0 C9, define... [Pg.267]

The use of for p is based on the assumption that the group structure employed is so fine as to make the spectral perturbations negligible. There has lately been evidence that, for many fast reactor calculations, this assumption is not valid. This evidence is reviewed below. [Pg.246]

The relative accuracy of the OSB and CB formulations have been discussed by Pitterle 123 and investigated by Greenspan 125) and by Kiefhaber (737). When the exact flux and importance function spectra are known, both formulations are exact, irrespective of the group structure used. The flux formulation [Eq. (236)] can cause significant errors for the same problems. In problems for which the cross-section averaging spectra were only slightly different from the exact spectra, the CB formulation was found (725) to be more accurate than the OSB formulation. Both formulations were much more accurate than the flux formulation. Conversely, Kiefhaber (737) examined problems with highly distorted spectra and found that the accuracy of the CB, OSB, and flux formulations for these problems is comparable. These results are too limited to allow conclusions about the relative accuracy and applicability of the two bilinear formulations. [Pg.253]

The spectra of protons of incident energy about 20 MeV scattered inelastic-ally from moderately heavy elements lose the group structure shown with lower energy protons and lighter elements and have to be interpreted by continuum theory. The experiments (Sect. 38) then lead to an estimation of relative level densities of the target nuclei. The excitation of low-lying levels of beryllium by 190 MeV electrons has also been observed (McIntyre et al. ). [Pg.31]

Weick suggested that the organisational structure of the smokejumper crew disintegrated as the crew members were unable to make sense of the orders they received. At the same time, sense-making processes were affected as the group structure disintegrated. The crew members failure to obey the order of the foreman was thus... [Pg.330]

Maintenance optimization aims at finding the grouping structure with a minimal maintenance cost J2 on a finite horizon [t, max, f ]. [Pg.542]

Dekker et al. (1992) developed an algorithm to determine the grouping structure which maximizes the... [Pg.543]

The group structures that have been discussed so far do not exhaust all the possibilities. It has already been pointed out (in section 8.2.1) that U(14) of the chain (52) can have Sp(14) as a subgroup. This symplectic group is identical to the one... [Pg.181]


See other pages where The Group Structure is mentioned: [Pg.561]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.25]   


SEARCH



Common Crystal Structures of the Group III Nitrides

Effect of the R Group Structure on SN2 Reactions

Functional Groups that Terminate the Core Structure

General Remarks on the Band Structures of Group III Nitrides

General Structural and Synthetic Interest in the Phenoxyl Group

Group structure

Metal Fluoride Surfaces that Contain Surface Hydroxyl Groups Aluminium Hydroxy Fluorides with the Hexagonal Tungsten Bronze Structure

Physical, Spectroscopic, and Structural Properties of the Various Group 4B Metallocene Dicarbonyls

Structure and Bonding The Carbonyl Group

Structure and SN2 Reactivity The Leaving Group

Structure and bonding in simple compounds of the Group 14 elements

Structure of the Carbonyl Group

Structure of the Heme Prosthetic Group

Structure of the Leaving Group

Structure of the Prosthetic Group

Structure-Function Relationship for the R Group

Structure. The functional group

The Main-Group Elements Applying Principles of Bonding and Structure

The incorporation of water solubilizing groups in a structure

© 2024 chempedia.info