The Classical Hydraulic Model

Recent work (Sec. 6.4.1) has shown that this model is an oversimplification of the processes occurring on a distillation plate. Nevertheless, many of the modern design procedures are based on this model and are expressed in terms of this model. 

As vapor rate is lowered, either at constant liquid rate or at a constant L/V ratio, the limit of excessive weeping is reached. This limit is not identical with the weep point, as some weeping can usually be tolerated. 

3 Definitions of tray area, vapor load, and liquid load 

Area definitions. Areas used for defining tray velocity are  

Total tower cross-section area, AT the inside cross-section area of the empty tower (without downcomers or trays). 

---

Figure 6.5 illustrates the classical hydraulic model of a fractionation tray. Liquid enters the tray from the downcomer of the tray above. The liquid entering the tray is aerated with vapor rising from the tray below to form froth on the tray. The froth flows across the tray until it reaches the outlet weir. The froth then flows over the weir into the downcomer, where the vapor is disengaged from the liquid,... 

The classic hydraulic model (Sec. 6.2,1) oversimplifies tray action. There are five main flow regimes on distillation trays (12,99). ThesB regimes (Figs. 6.25 to 6.28) may all occur on the same tray under different liquid and vapor flow rates (Fig. 6.29). An excellent overview of the fundamentals and modeling of these flow regimes is presented by Lockett (12). 

The froth regime is the most common operating regime in distillation practice, and ite hydraulics is reasonably well approximated by the classical hydraulic model (Sec. 6.2.1 Fig. 6.5). 

While the classical hydraulic model provides a reasonable approximation for the froth and emulsion regimes, different mechanisms determine the hydraulics and mass transfer in the spray regime. The transition from froth to spray is gradual, and so is the change in the hydraulic and mass transfer behavior (110,111,113,114). 

Flow across the tray. The classical hydraulic model implies that liquid flows across the tray by building up a liquid head on the tray, and when this head exceeds the weir height it overflows it. This mechanism is valid in principle when liquid is the continuous phase, but in the spray regime, vapor is the continuous phase and the liquid is present as drops in the vapor space (Figs, 6,25d, 6.26c, and 6.276). In... 

Figure 6.5 illustrates the classical hydraulic model of a fractionation... 

In the microscopic analysis of CHF, researchers have applied classical analysis of the thermal hydraulic models to the CHF condition. These models are perceived on the basis of physical measurements and visual observations of simulated tests. The physical properties of coolant used in the analysis are also deduced from the operating parameters of the test. Thus the insight into CHF mechanisms revealed in microscopic analysis can be used later to explain the gross effects of the operating parameters on the CHF. 

A pressure-driven gas flow is generated by applying a pressure difference between the inlet and the outlet of a fluidic system, for example, a channel. Due to very small hydraulic diameters, pressure-driven gas flows in microchannels are laminar. Gas microflows are distinct from gas macroflows by rarefaction effects which appear as soon as the mean free path of the molecules is no longer negligible compared with the hydraulic diameter of the microchannel. For such rarefied flows, the classic Poiseuille model is no longer valid, and other models should be used, according to the rarefaction level, which is quantified by the Knudsen number. 

Another modeling analysis is presented by Russo et al. (1998), who examined field transport of bromacil by application of the classical one-region, advection-dispersion equation (ADE) model and the two region, mobile-immobile model (MM) recall Sects. 10.1 and 10.2. The analysis involved detailed, three-dimensional numerical simulations of flow and transport, using in-situ measurements of hydraulic... 

Once the hydrocarbons have been solubilized in the formation water, they move with the water under the influence of elevation and pressure (fluid), thermal, electroosmotic and chemicoosmotic potentials. Of these, the fluid potential is the most important and the best known. The fluid potential is defined as the amount of work required to transport a unit mass of fluid from an arbitrary chosen datum (usually sea level) and state to the position and state of the point considered. The classic work of Hubbert (192) on the theory of groundwater motion was the first published account of the basinwide flow of fluids that considered the problem in exact mathematical terms as a steady-state phenomenon. His concept of formation fluid flow is shown in Figure 3A. However, incongruities in the relation between total hydraulic head and depth below surface in topographic low areas suggested that Hubbert s model was incomplete (193). Expanding on the work of Hubbert, Toth (194, 195) introduced a mathematical mfcdel in which exact flow patterns are... 

As for many immobilised enz3nnes, the hydraulic behaviour Is not adequately described by classical fluid mechanics. It was, therefore, necessary to develop a detailed mathematical model of the column hydraulics which together with a laboratory test procedure, would provide data on the basic mechanical properties of the enzyme pellet. The model Is based on a force balance across a differential element of the enzyme bed. The primary forces involved are fluid friction, wall friction, solids cohesion, static weight and buoyancy. The force balance Is integrated to provide generating functions for fluid pressure drop and solid stress pressure down the length of the column under given conditions. 

On the basis of the concepts developed in the former sections, the latter section showed a series of design problems. The used approach can also be interesting for problems like system architecture synthesis and comparison [28], parameter synthesis [16], equilibrium or steady-state position determination [4], or the coupling of model inversion with dynamic optimization [24, 26, 27, 32], Finally, the approach was used in the domain of active systems [31], in industrial applications like in aeronautics for electro-hydraulic actuators [17] or in automotive for electric power steering and suspension systems [29, 30], and for classic and hybrid power trains [3,28]. 

---