Terrestrial planets accretion models

An important development stemming from heterogeneous accretion models is that they introduced the concept that the Earth was built from more than one component and that these may have been accreted in separate stages. This provided an apparent answer to the problem of how to build a planet with a reduced metallic core and an oxidized sihcate mantle. However, heterogeneous accretion is hard to reconcile with modem models for the protracted dynamics of terrestrial planet accretion compared with the shortness of nebular timescales. Therefore, they have been abandoned by most scientists and are barely mentioned in modem geochemistry literature any more. 

Of the two models, homogeneous accretion is generally favoured. H. Wancke from the Max Planck Institute in Mainz (1986) described a variant of this model, in which the terrestrial planets were formed from two different components. Component A was highly reduced, containing elements with metallic character (such as Fe, Co, Ni, W) but poor in volatile and partially volatile elements. Component B was completely oxidized and contained elements with metallic character as their oxides, as well as a relatively high proportion of volatile elements and water. For the Earth, the ratio A B is calculated to be 85 15, while for Mars it is 60 40. According to this model, component B (and thus water) only arrived on Earth towards the end of the accretion phase, i.e., after the formation of the core. This means that only some of the water was able to react with the metallic fraction. 

These models provide an explanation for the thermal structure of the asteroid belt that is probably correct in principle but not in its details. The recognition that differentiated asteroids formed earlier than chondrites, perhaps within the terrestrial planet region, requires models in which asteroid accretion was initiated earlier than 2 Myr after CAI formation. 

It was at one time thought that even the terrestrial planets themselves formed directly by condensation from a hot solar nebula. This led to a class of models called heterogeneous accretion models, in which the composition of the material accreting to form the Earth changed with time as the nebula cooled. Eucken (1944) proposed such a heterogeneous accretion model in which early condensed metal formed a core to the Earth around which silicate accreted after condensation at lower temperatures. In this context the silicate-depleted, iron-enriched nature of Mercury makes sense as a body that accreted in an area of the solar nebula that was kept too hot to condense the same proportion of silicate as is found in the Earth (Lewis, 1972 Grossman and Larimer, 1974). Conversely, the lower density of Mars could partly reflect collection of an excess of silicate in cooler reaches of the inner solar nebula. So the... 

These models produced a zoned Earth with an early metallic core surrounded by silicate, without the need for a separate later stage of core formation. The application of condensation theory to the striking variations in the densities and compositions of the terrestrial planets, and how metal and silicate form in distinct reservoirs has been seen as problematic for some time. Heterogeneous accretion models require fast accretion and core formation if these processes reflect condensation in the nebula and such timescales can be tested with isotopic systems. The time-scales for planetary accretion now are known to be far too long for an origin by partial condensation from a hot nebular gas. Nevertheless, heterogeneous accretion models have become embedded in the textbooks in Earth sciences (e.g.. Brown and Mussett, 1981) and astronomy (e.g.. Seeds, 1996). 

Probably this requires timescales of <10 yr (Podosek and Cassen, 1994). In contrast, the most widely accepted dynamic models advocated for the formation of the terrestrial planets (Wetherill, 1986), involve protracted timescales —10 -10 yr. Application of these same models to the outer planets would mean even longer timescales. In fact, some of the outermost planets would not have yet formed. Therefore, the bimodal distribution of planetary density and its striking spatial distribution appear to require different accretion mechanisms in these two portions of the solar system. However, one simply cannot divide the accretion dynamics into two zones. A range of rate-limiting processes probably controlled accretion of both the terrestrial and Jovian planets and the debates about which of these processes may have been common to both is far from resolved. There almost certainly was some level of commonality. 

How do giant planets form Two different models, disk instability versus core accretion followed by gas collapse, are viable. They require very different timescales, have very different implications for satellite formation and internal composition, and may have implications for the ubiquity of giant planets and terrestrial planets around other stars. The formation of Uranus and Neptune is even less well understood, and no agreement exists as to whether these are stillborn Jupiters or the product of a distinct kind of formation process. 

The origins of volatile species on the terrestrial planets have been modeled as resulting from accretion, in variable planet-specific proportions, of rocky materials as well as three types of comets. These formed at different heliocentric distances and thus at different nebular temperatures, leading to distinctive elemental fractionation patterns in volatiles trapped in their ice from ambient nebular gases (e.g., Owen et al., 1991, 1992 Owen and... 

Geochemists and cosmochemists initially looked to models of planetary formation and comparison with other terrestrial planets to understand the earliest composition of Earth s atmosphere. During planetary accretion and core formation, volatile components were liberated... 

---